Zlomov
sep 2005 se unió
Te damos la bienvenida a nuevo perfil
Nuestras actualizaciones aún están en desarrollo. Si bien la versión anterior de el perfil ya no está disponible, estamos trabajando activamente en mejoras, ¡y algunas de las funciones que faltan regresarán pronto! Mantente al tanto para su regreso. Mientras tanto, el análisis de calificaciones sigue disponible en nuestras aplicaciones para iOS y Android, en la página de perfil. Para ver la distribución de tus calificaciones por año y género, consulta nuestra nueva Guía de ayuda.
Distintivos6
Para saber cómo ganar distintivos, ve a página de ayuda de distintivos.
Reseñas23
Clasificación de Zlomov
This film did not gain much popularity at the time of its release, despite the presence of many famous actors in it.
The main character is a young student girl who is finishing a car driving course and wants to celebrate it with a trip to the sea.
She flirts with an older teacher, the owner of a large sedan, but her peer, the owner of a more compact sedan, is also in love with her.
The heroine herself is too frivolous and self-confident to bother with the final choice. She sees herself as a kind of beauty, who is just so amazing that everybody got to satisfy all her requests for nothing.
At first, she leaves with the old man, but after quarreling with him, she gets into the car with a young man.
In short, the character is pretty flat, like the whole movie.
It's quite unpleasant how actors who play quite well in other films have to play the void in this.
One of the advantages is that the film is in color and you can see new cars and good roads in it. Most likely, it was conceived as a showcase film in competition with the United States. However, for ordinary Soviet viewers, the problem of the heroes turned out to be not close, because not everyone could afford a car.
The main character is a young student girl who is finishing a car driving course and wants to celebrate it with a trip to the sea.
She flirts with an older teacher, the owner of a large sedan, but her peer, the owner of a more compact sedan, is also in love with her.
The heroine herself is too frivolous and self-confident to bother with the final choice. She sees herself as a kind of beauty, who is just so amazing that everybody got to satisfy all her requests for nothing.
At first, she leaves with the old man, but after quarreling with him, she gets into the car with a young man.
In short, the character is pretty flat, like the whole movie.
It's quite unpleasant how actors who play quite well in other films have to play the void in this.
One of the advantages is that the film is in color and you can see new cars and good roads in it. Most likely, it was conceived as a showcase film in competition with the United States. However, for ordinary Soviet viewers, the problem of the heroes turned out to be not close, because not everyone could afford a car.
This series stands over the edge of the abyss into which Russian cinema will then fly away. Behind him are films flooded with light and optimism, the mood of which fades from the lack of realism. Below is a crater of negativity, hatred and anger.
Therefore, there are many outwardly socialist positive characters in the film, who turn out to be soulless scoundrels, and socially unreliable ones turn out to be open and honest personalities. But the majority will remain suspicious, rigid and negatively disposed towards the main character.
Actually, the main character Sergey Krasheninnikov is a law student trying to uncover the death of a girl by the lake. In previous series, he was a schoolboy, but always gravitated towards justice.
Now, during the investigation and the collection of testimony, he faces opposition at all levels. One of the suspects in the failure to provide timely medical care to the deceased turns out to be a successful doctor who was vacationing nearby. By coincidence, he is the boss of the bride of the main character.
Using his connections, he tries to influence the investigation. The film once again reveals the problem of informal ties, nepotism and hidden intrigues in Soviet society, for the sake of petty gain. As well as attempts to evade responsibility when the victim is already dead, but there is no premeditated murder.
Other suspects (because of whom the girl ended up at the lake) are also trying to influence the main character.
Not having a state title, but being only an intern, the main character cannot use power against these people.
The film is not completely negative and black, but it has already been shifted to the sector of grayness and twilight.
But its interesting to follow the events of this flick.
Therefore, there are many outwardly socialist positive characters in the film, who turn out to be soulless scoundrels, and socially unreliable ones turn out to be open and honest personalities. But the majority will remain suspicious, rigid and negatively disposed towards the main character.
Actually, the main character Sergey Krasheninnikov is a law student trying to uncover the death of a girl by the lake. In previous series, he was a schoolboy, but always gravitated towards justice.
Now, during the investigation and the collection of testimony, he faces opposition at all levels. One of the suspects in the failure to provide timely medical care to the deceased turns out to be a successful doctor who was vacationing nearby. By coincidence, he is the boss of the bride of the main character.
Using his connections, he tries to influence the investigation. The film once again reveals the problem of informal ties, nepotism and hidden intrigues in Soviet society, for the sake of petty gain. As well as attempts to evade responsibility when the victim is already dead, but there is no premeditated murder.
Other suspects (because of whom the girl ended up at the lake) are also trying to influence the main character.
Not having a state title, but being only an intern, the main character cannot use power against these people.
The film is not completely negative and black, but it has already been shifted to the sector of grayness and twilight.
But its interesting to follow the events of this flick.
I have an ambivalent attitude towards the film.
On the one hand, this is a pretty easy and fun children's movie. It has an incredibly attractive atmosphere of the late 70s. It is very sunny and summery.
The main character is a 10-year-old boy who goes skateboarding in the Parisian Trocadero park every day. He has friends and a wise, beautiful mother.
During one of his walks, he meets a girl and falls in love with her. But her parents are quite respectable people. He wants them to like him so that he can spend more time with the girl.
But on the other hand, in this film it is not very clear why he and his mother live alone, even in a fairly decent house. His mother have a huge American SUV and she works as a photographer. Probably her job is highly paid. She spends a lot of time with her son, they do yoga. She is the quintessential free independent woman of her time. But in the film, it's taken for granted. It is unclear to me whether this is a look at the crisis of the mononuclear family and the consequences of the hippie movement and students of 68, or an assessment of the role of the mother in modern conditions in principle. In short, I would love to watch a movie about how this woman does it all. In the end, she is played by Annie Duperey and I started watching the movie mainly because of this fact.
On the one hand, this is a pretty easy and fun children's movie. It has an incredibly attractive atmosphere of the late 70s. It is very sunny and summery.
The main character is a 10-year-old boy who goes skateboarding in the Parisian Trocadero park every day. He has friends and a wise, beautiful mother.
During one of his walks, he meets a girl and falls in love with her. But her parents are quite respectable people. He wants them to like him so that he can spend more time with the girl.
But on the other hand, in this film it is not very clear why he and his mother live alone, even in a fairly decent house. His mother have a huge American SUV and she works as a photographer. Probably her job is highly paid. She spends a lot of time with her son, they do yoga. She is the quintessential free independent woman of her time. But in the film, it's taken for granted. It is unclear to me whether this is a look at the crisis of the mononuclear family and the consequences of the hippie movement and students of 68, or an assessment of the role of the mother in modern conditions in principle. In short, I would love to watch a movie about how this woman does it all. In the end, she is played by Annie Duperey and I started watching the movie mainly because of this fact.
Encuestas realizadas recientemente
9 en total de las encuestas realizadas
