wes-115
jul 2005 se unió
Te damos la bienvenida a nuevo perfil
Nuestras actualizaciones aún están en desarrollo. Si bien la versión anterior de el perfil ya no está disponible, estamos trabajando activamente en mejoras, ¡y algunas de las funciones que faltan regresarán pronto! Mantente al tanto para su regreso. Mientras tanto, el análisis de calificaciones sigue disponible en nuestras aplicaciones para iOS y Android, en la página de perfil. Para ver la distribución de tus calificaciones por año y género, consulta nuestra nueva Guía de ayuda.
Distintivos3
Para saber cómo ganar distintivos, ve a página de ayuda de distintivos.
Reseñas5
Clasificación de wes-115
The movie is very good...if you're into this kind of thing. It's nice to see a franchise splatter film that is intense and gory without being cheesy. Many of the current crop of splatter films are played intentionally cheesy for humor. Which is fine, but they shouldn't ALL be like that. This movie has some humor in it, but it's a darker humor, and not meant to be cheesy or campy.
Everything that comes to mind when you hear the words "Texas Chainsaw Massacre" is in this movie. No wussing-out in this one! Murder, torture, cannibalism, insanity and a touch of the surreal. Oh yeah, and a chainsaw. No punches are pulled, so this flick is not for the squeamish.
Tonally it wasn't as surreal as the original, but it had a better (read: creepier) tone than the 2003 remake. Plenty of blood and guts. R. Lee Ermey plays a major character instead of a bit-player like in the 2003 remake, and the film benefits from this.
Everything that comes to mind when you hear the words "Texas Chainsaw Massacre" is in this movie. No wussing-out in this one! Murder, torture, cannibalism, insanity and a touch of the surreal. Oh yeah, and a chainsaw. No punches are pulled, so this flick is not for the squeamish.
Tonally it wasn't as surreal as the original, but it had a better (read: creepier) tone than the 2003 remake. Plenty of blood and guts. R. Lee Ermey plays a major character instead of a bit-player like in the 2003 remake, and the film benefits from this.
This overrated turd lends further credence to my theorem, stated as follows:
Theorem: "Movies from the 70's suck."
Corollary: "The level of suck is directly proportional to the level of critical acclaim."
There are some extremely rare exceptions to this postulate. Don't Look Now is NOT one of them. Do not fall for the hype.
I love psychological horror, spooky atmosphere and a thriller with a good story. (IMO, The Shining is the scariest movie ever made.)
This movie has none of that. What it does have is pretentious editing, unnecessary zooms, wooden acting, trite photography and hideously bad sound design. In fact, it contains some of the worst Foley work I've ever been subjected to. The famous sex scene is too long, contains way too much of naked Donald Sutherland, and is an object lesson in how NOT to cut a scene.
Bad. Just bad. Awful. Stay away.
Theorem: "Movies from the 70's suck."
Corollary: "The level of suck is directly proportional to the level of critical acclaim."
There are some extremely rare exceptions to this postulate. Don't Look Now is NOT one of them. Do not fall for the hype.
I love psychological horror, spooky atmosphere and a thriller with a good story. (IMO, The Shining is the scariest movie ever made.)
This movie has none of that. What it does have is pretentious editing, unnecessary zooms, wooden acting, trite photography and hideously bad sound design. In fact, it contains some of the worst Foley work I've ever been subjected to. The famous sex scene is too long, contains way too much of naked Donald Sutherland, and is an object lesson in how NOT to cut a scene.
Bad. Just bad. Awful. Stay away.