[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendario de lanzamientosTop 250 películasPelículas más popularesBuscar películas por géneroTaquilla superiorHorarios y entradasNoticias sobre películasPelículas de la India destacadas
    Programas de televisión y streamingLas 250 mejores seriesSeries más popularesBuscar series por géneroNoticias de TV
    Qué verÚltimos trailersTítulos originales de IMDbSelecciones de IMDbDestacado de IMDbGuía de entretenimiento familiarPodcasts de IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalPremios STARmeterInformación sobre premiosInformación sobre festivalesTodos los eventos
    Nacidos un día como hoyCelebridades más popularesNoticias sobre celebridades
    Centro de ayudaZona de colaboradoresEncuestas
Para profesionales de la industria
  • Idioma
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista de visualización
Iniciar sesión
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usar app

mrw8

ago 2005 se unió
Te damos la bienvenida a nuevo perfil
Nuestras actualizaciones aún están en desarrollo. Si bien la versión anterior de el perfil ya no está disponible, estamos trabajando activamente en mejoras, ¡y algunas de las funciones que faltan regresarán pronto! Mantente al tanto para su regreso. Mientras tanto, el análisis de calificaciones sigue disponible en nuestras aplicaciones para iOS y Android, en la página de perfil. Para ver la distribución de tus calificaciones por año y género, consulta nuestra nueva Guía de ayuda.

Distintivos2

Para saber cómo ganar distintivos, ve a página de ayuda de distintivos.
Explora los distintivos

Reseñas24

Clasificación de mrw8
Indiana Jones y el reino de la calavera de cristal

Indiana Jones y el reino de la calavera de cristal

6.2
6
  • 26 may 2008
  • Full of self-conscious gimmicks and too mouthy

    I expected this film would be a mistake because Lucas was involved. He may not be completely sane anymore, perhaps pining for the jungles of Dagoba and the wisdom of Yoda. It's hard to imagine that "The Mummy" would become the new Indiana Jones franchise, but that's what has happened. In fact, Indiana Jones #4 attempts to steal quite a bit from The Mummy, but does it much worse because of the heavy expectations and sacred-cowness of these characters. When you have characters that the producers love more than themselves then you run into trouble. WHERE IS THE JEOPARDY? Yes, there are plenty of crisis situations but the sacrifice and emotion is mostly absent. Far too many self-referential comments and far too few new ideas. This was "The Mummy Returns" all over. But The Mummy at least avoids the gimmicks and mouthy dialog. IT was sort of painful to watch the otherwise humble and natural Karen Allen take a paycheck to play a small role in an ensemble mess. And Harrison Ford learned some bad habits in Hollywood Homicide and Six Days and Seven Nights and Spielberg let him get away with a little too much nonchalant banter. I kept thinking that times have surely changed for scenes to go on for five minutes after their usefulness has ended. Remember the scene with the monkey and the dates in Indy #1? There was suspense and forward motion and sacrifice and drama AND plot development. All in one short little scene with a monkey and a date. That was the kind of style and honesty that Indy #3 and #4 wholeheartedly abandoned in favor of cheap jokes and visual gimmicks. Where, I wondered, was the loyal dog who runs up to save the day by handing Indy his whip or hat or biting the fuse of the dynamite? Indy #4 is that kind of movie.

    Someone told me that the ending was disappointing, but I felt that if you were still on the hook by the ending then you should have no problem with it. Yes, I was 15 when Indy #1 came out, but my father also loved that film. I still watch Indy #1 regularly and think it does everything right. Indy #4 doesn't know if it wants to make love to these characters or make a movie with them. I can't believe a 15 year old kid will respond to this mouthy film with anything but a yawn.
    Virus

    Virus

    5.1
    4
  • 11 may 2008
  • A mess

    The Specials

    The Specials

    5.7
    1
  • 27 abr 2008
  • Horrific

    Writer James Gunn seems to believe if you put a blue person in a car with a person wearing a mask then you get instant laughs. Nope! This seems like a case where the writer got writers block, but kept on typing anyway. And the result was "The Specials" a truly useless, low budget, default direction, piece of garbage. Few movies on T.V. are so bad that they make the commercials look good, but The Specials wins this prize. I kept on waiting for the movie to start, but was denied for hour upon hour. If you took a lawn chair and set it down on your average sidewalk I can guarantee more laughs and action than this entire movie. I can only imagine that this project was bought and sold to a European distribution market long before the words "Fade In" were ever written. Thus, the only people who cared about the quality had already paid off their hookers and drug dealers and were vacationing in The Bahamas when critical decisions had to be made. The only folks left were apparently complete novices in the fields of writing, directing and editing. I give them credit for finishing the film in between finishing their high school degrees and bagging groceries at the local costco. Congratulations! Maybe one day you can out go and actually make a film! Won't that be a new experience? This is the lowest of the low and I'm amazed viewers found something redeeming in this film. I've heard more interesting dialog coming through my neighbors fence. I've seen more action at the dog park. I was impressed that Tom Church didn't mail in his performance, like Rob Lowe. Church actually took his job seriously and delivered a performance that can only be described as professional. Sad. He really thought he was making a movie. I'm not sure if that's a good sign or a bad sign. He's deserves credit for earning his money. That's about all that can be said. Rob Lowe, on the other hand, saw through this invisible script from the first line and managed to avoid acting for the entire film. That's no small accomplishment for a role with more dialog than John Adams. Lowe actually mails his performance in from outer space. Maybe from the same planet the alien orphan is from. I'm not sure. Lowe, along with the rest of the cast, recognize that the lack of subtext and emotion and meaning and point to their lines of dialog mean the writer did less work than the guy who makes the coffee. So why act? Why put in the effort? The producer is supposed to have that answer but I guarantee he was long gone by the time the cameras started to role. As I said, the only high points were the commercial interruptions. The rest was absolutely terrible.
    Ver todas las reseñas

    Visto recientemente

    Habilita las cookies del navegador para usar esta función. Más información.
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    Inicia sesión para obtener más accesoInicia sesión para obtener más acceso
    Sigue a IMDb en las redes sociales
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    Para Android e iOS
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    • Ayuda
    • Índice del sitio
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licencia de datos de IMDb
    • Sala de prensa
    • Publicidad
    • Trabaja con nosotros
    • Condiciones de uso
    • Política de privacidad
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, una compañía de Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.