Chrispearce2
ene 2015 se unió
Te damos la bienvenida a nuevo perfil
Nuestras actualizaciones aún están en desarrollo. Si bien la versión anterior de el perfil ya no está disponible, estamos trabajando activamente en mejoras, ¡y algunas de las funciones que faltan regresarán pronto! Mantente al tanto para su regreso. Mientras tanto, el análisis de calificaciones sigue disponible en nuestras aplicaciones para iOS y Android, en la página de perfil. Para ver la distribución de tus calificaciones por año y género, consulta nuestra nueva Guía de ayuda.
Distintivos3
Para saber cómo ganar distintivos, ve a página de ayuda de distintivos.
Reseñas133
Clasificación de Chrispearce2
ChatGPT
Log in You said: Expand this review to 600 words. You will see within 1 minute this film is terrible. With shocking special effects that should be avoided if budgets do not allow.
It would seem that fake reviews are still plentiful on IMBD so please ignore any good comments you may read.
The plot must have been written after a night out on the source. The dialogue is painful to listen too and trees act less wooden ChatGPT said: This film is, without a doubt, a disaster. From the opening moments, you'll know immediately that it is a terrible piece of cinema. Within the first minute, the lack of quality becomes glaringly obvious. The special effects, which are crucial in any modern film, are shockingly bad. In fact, they're so terrible that they detract from any potential enjoyment the movie might offer. It's clear that the filmmakers didn't have the budget for proper effects, and instead of finding creative solutions to work within their constraints, they've opted for visual disasters that are distracting and, frankly, embarrassing. If your budget doesn't allow for good special effects, it might be better to avoid them altogether or find ways to tell your story without relying on them.
The plot of this film seems as if it was conceived after a night of excessive drinking, with the script following no logical progression. It feels as though the writers simply wrote whatever came to mind, regardless of how it would fit into the broader story. There's no coherence, no compelling direction, and no real investment in the development of the narrative. It's almost as if they threw everything against the wall to see what would stick, but nothing does. The film jumps from one ridiculous scene to the next, never establishing any real sense of urgency or connection between characters. Watching it feels like an endless string of disjointed, nonsensical moments that never lead anywhere meaningful.
The dialogue is equally painful. If you've ever watched a film with wooden or stiff performances, this one takes it to a whole new level. The characters speak in lines that feel completely unnatural, as if they were reading off cue cards without any sense of emotion or conviction. The interactions between the characters are awkward and cringe-worthy, and the attempts at humor are often forced, leaving the audience wondering why they ever tried to make this film in the first place. The dialogue is not only unrealistic but also painfully repetitive, with characters often repeating themselves or delivering lines in such a flat manner that it makes you question whether the actors even cared about what they were saying.
There's a particular irony in the fact that the characters, who are supposed to be the focal point of the film, end up being less expressive and less engaging than the trees in the background. In fact, the trees appear to have more depth and personality than the main cast members. Watching these performances, it's almost as though the actors are deliberately trying to make the most basic and monotonous expressions they can, as if they were doing a bad imitation of a bad imitation. The lack of chemistry between the actors is palpable, and it's a struggle to care about what happens to them or to follow their storylines. This lack of character development only adds to the frustration, as you're left with no one to root for or sympathize with.
Another thing that needs to be addressed is the fact that fake reviews are still rampant on IMDb. It's clear that the positive comments on this film are, in all likelihood, written by people with no actual connection to the film or who were paid to write them. If you take a moment to read these reviews, you'll notice that they are vague, overly enthusiastic, and completely out of touch with the actual quality of the movie. They're clearly an attempt to skew the public perception of this disaster, and I'd strongly advise anyone to ignore these fake reviews. There's no merit to them, and they only serve to mislead potential viewers into thinking that this film is somehow worth watching.
In conclusion, this film is an utter failure on almost every front. From the poor special effects to the nonsensical plot, unwatchable dialogue, and lifeless performances, there's very little to redeem it. The movie doesn't even have the decency to be so bad it's funny-it's simply a painful experience from start to finish. If you're looking for something entertaining or thought-provoking, do yourself a favor and avoid this one at all costs. It's not worth your time, and you'll regret watching it. If there's one thing you can take away from this review, it's that sometimes the best way to appreciate good cinema is to avoid watching films like this.
Log in You said: Expand this review to 600 words. You will see within 1 minute this film is terrible. With shocking special effects that should be avoided if budgets do not allow.
It would seem that fake reviews are still plentiful on IMBD so please ignore any good comments you may read.
The plot must have been written after a night out on the source. The dialogue is painful to listen too and trees act less wooden ChatGPT said: This film is, without a doubt, a disaster. From the opening moments, you'll know immediately that it is a terrible piece of cinema. Within the first minute, the lack of quality becomes glaringly obvious. The special effects, which are crucial in any modern film, are shockingly bad. In fact, they're so terrible that they detract from any potential enjoyment the movie might offer. It's clear that the filmmakers didn't have the budget for proper effects, and instead of finding creative solutions to work within their constraints, they've opted for visual disasters that are distracting and, frankly, embarrassing. If your budget doesn't allow for good special effects, it might be better to avoid them altogether or find ways to tell your story without relying on them.
The plot of this film seems as if it was conceived after a night of excessive drinking, with the script following no logical progression. It feels as though the writers simply wrote whatever came to mind, regardless of how it would fit into the broader story. There's no coherence, no compelling direction, and no real investment in the development of the narrative. It's almost as if they threw everything against the wall to see what would stick, but nothing does. The film jumps from one ridiculous scene to the next, never establishing any real sense of urgency or connection between characters. Watching it feels like an endless string of disjointed, nonsensical moments that never lead anywhere meaningful.
The dialogue is equally painful. If you've ever watched a film with wooden or stiff performances, this one takes it to a whole new level. The characters speak in lines that feel completely unnatural, as if they were reading off cue cards without any sense of emotion or conviction. The interactions between the characters are awkward and cringe-worthy, and the attempts at humor are often forced, leaving the audience wondering why they ever tried to make this film in the first place. The dialogue is not only unrealistic but also painfully repetitive, with characters often repeating themselves or delivering lines in such a flat manner that it makes you question whether the actors even cared about what they were saying.
There's a particular irony in the fact that the characters, who are supposed to be the focal point of the film, end up being less expressive and less engaging than the trees in the background. In fact, the trees appear to have more depth and personality than the main cast members. Watching these performances, it's almost as though the actors are deliberately trying to make the most basic and monotonous expressions they can, as if they were doing a bad imitation of a bad imitation. The lack of chemistry between the actors is palpable, and it's a struggle to care about what happens to them or to follow their storylines. This lack of character development only adds to the frustration, as you're left with no one to root for or sympathize with.
Another thing that needs to be addressed is the fact that fake reviews are still rampant on IMDb. It's clear that the positive comments on this film are, in all likelihood, written by people with no actual connection to the film or who were paid to write them. If you take a moment to read these reviews, you'll notice that they are vague, overly enthusiastic, and completely out of touch with the actual quality of the movie. They're clearly an attempt to skew the public perception of this disaster, and I'd strongly advise anyone to ignore these fake reviews. There's no merit to them, and they only serve to mislead potential viewers into thinking that this film is somehow worth watching.
In conclusion, this film is an utter failure on almost every front. From the poor special effects to the nonsensical plot, unwatchable dialogue, and lifeless performances, there's very little to redeem it. The movie doesn't even have the decency to be so bad it's funny-it's simply a painful experience from start to finish. If you're looking for something entertaining or thought-provoking, do yourself a favor and avoid this one at all costs. It's not worth your time, and you'll regret watching it. If there's one thing you can take away from this review, it's that sometimes the best way to appreciate good cinema is to avoid watching films like this.
It's no "red dog" or "rex" but it did bring a tear to my eye (that might be down to a bottle of red) not to shabby but it's great. As a directorial debut by the lead. Not bad at all but avoid the "tatum" needs sex parts. I like the lead but this is an easy entry into directing. I wish you well. Ok, to make up my 600 with fake parts. Tatum smashes it out of the park, tatum is back, tatum thrills with directors debut. Everyone is back with a "heavyweight slam" how many words do I need to write. Who will win between Netflix and prime for the hearts and minds of the nation? I mean I don't know....................,...........
If you are of my age and the first one was your go to movie. Then this is a winner. If this is not, watch the first film first .. this is a winner. There wasn't too much interaction with the lesser flyers but I can forgive that. Off to watch the original.