Universaliva

Predator: Badlands proves that the franchise is not only alive, but evolving in the right direction. The story is solid and focused, offering a fresh take without losing the core identity of Predator. It doesn't rely on nostalgia alone; instead, it builds tension through atmosphere, survival, and world-building.

The CGI is impressive, seamlessly blending practical intensity with modern visual effects. The Predator feels tangible, dangerous, and powerful. Character development is handled well, allowing the audience to connect emotionally without slowing down the pacing.

Visually, the film is stunning. The alien landscapes, monster designs, and planetary setting are beautifully realized and distinct, giving the movie a strong sci-fi identity beyond Earth-based hunts.

Dan Trachtenberg is the right director for this franchise. Just like in Prey and Killer of Killers, he understands restraint, tension, and myth-building. His approach respects the Predator's legacy while pushing it forward.

This film should be further integrated into the broader Alien universe. The potential for deeper lore and crossover storytelling is enormous and worth exploring.

Criticism calling the film "bad" feels misplaced. Many complaints come from viewers who are too emotionally attached to the original Predator and stuck revisiting its past. Yes, the original is iconic-but the franchise must move on to survive and grow.

Conclusion: Predator: Badlands is a visually rich, well-directed, and confident step forward for the series-and a strong foundation for a larger shared universe.

I still remember watching the original Naked Gun back in elementary school - laughing at the slapstick chaos even when I didn't get all the jokes. Now, in my 40s, seeing this new revival hit the big screen feels like coming full circle. It's goofy, absurd, and somehow timeless, proving that the kind of comedy Leslie Nielsen perfected never really fades.

The 2025 Naked Gun is unapologetically silly, packed with slapstick, and brimming with the kind of absurd gags that made the original trilogy (1988, 1991, 1994) comedy classics. From pratfalls to perfectly timed one-liners, this sequel proves that spoof humor still works when done with heart.

The film also delivers a steady stream of cameos that keep the laughs rolling - some quick and subtle, others cleverly nodding to the franchise's legacy. Each one adds a spark of nostalgia while still feeling fresh.

Liam Neeson is the standout. Known mostly for his intense action roles, he completely reinvents himself here. His deadpan delivery and full commitment to the ridiculous make him feel like the natural heir to Leslie Nielsen. He doesn't just replace Nielsen - he carries the torch, balancing respect for the original with his own unique spin.

Adding to the fun is Pamela Anderson, who genuinely impresses. She brings charm, sharp comedic timing, and unexpected chemistry with Neeson. Far from being just stunt casting, she actually enhances the film and shows she can thrive in this brand of comedy.

Altogether, this new Naked Gun balances nostalgia with fresh energy. It remembers its roots while daring to play with them, reminding us that laughter - especially the dumb, goofy, wonderfully absurd kind - is ageless.

Honestly, this version of Superman feels way too childish and overly comical. The tone is all over the place - cringey one-liners, awkward slapstick, and visuals that look like they belong in a Saturday morning cartoon. Instead of being a bold reimagining, it feels like a step back into campy territory no one really asked for.

David Corenswet, while a decent lookalike, completely fails to capture the commanding presence and charisma that Henry Cavill brought to the role. Cavill had gravitas - a balance of strength, vulnerability, and quiet intensity. Corenswet feels... light. Like he's playing dress-up rather than embodying Earth's greatest protector.

Worse, the theater itself reflected the film's flat tone. The room was dead quiet - barely a chuckle, almost no reaction. It was a sharp contrast to the electric energy I felt during Deadpool vs Wolverine, where the whole crowd was engaged, laughing, reacting. This Superman? It just didn't land.

Compared to Man of Steel, which had emotional depth, stunning visuals, and a powerful score, this version feels hollow. It might please kids or hardcore nostalgia fans, but it's missing soul.

Rating: 6/10 - Looks like Superman, but lacks the heart, presence, and impact. For something truly heroic, revisit Man of Steel.