j-m-d-b
dic 2004 se unió
Te damos la bienvenida a nuevo perfil
Nuestras actualizaciones aún están en desarrollo. Si bien la versión anterior de el perfil ya no está disponible, estamos trabajando activamente en mejoras, ¡y algunas de las funciones que faltan regresarán pronto! Mantente al tanto para su regreso. Mientras tanto, el análisis de calificaciones sigue disponible en nuestras aplicaciones para iOS y Android, en la página de perfil. Para ver la distribución de tus calificaciones por año y género, consulta nuestra nueva Guía de ayuda.
Distintivos6
Para saber cómo ganar distintivos, ve a página de ayuda de distintivos.
Calificaciones993
Clasificación de j-m-d-b
Reseñas32
Clasificación de j-m-d-b
I never read Stephen King's story but I am guessing that if I did, and then saw this film, I'd be pretty disappointed. Literature allows you to form fantastic images before your mind's eye, film adaptations risk becoming mundane derivates and I think that's probably what happened here.
The acting was not bad, a little pedestrian though. Some of the visual ideas were alright but they did not add to the story or even felt that related to it, so I can't give credit for that. The sound design may have been technically fine, but again felt unrelated.
There are some philosophical ideas being pandered that may resonate if you never thought too deeply about your existence but they are actually pretty shallow. There is tons of loose ends and completely absurd plot holes, which may be excused as magic realism but I've seen that done much, much better in other films.
Meh out of 10 I'm afraid.
The acting was not bad, a little pedestrian though. Some of the visual ideas were alright but they did not add to the story or even felt that related to it, so I can't give credit for that. The sound design may have been technically fine, but again felt unrelated.
There are some philosophical ideas being pandered that may resonate if you never thought too deeply about your existence but they are actually pretty shallow. There is tons of loose ends and completely absurd plot holes, which may be excused as magic realism but I've seen that done much, much better in other films.
Meh out of 10 I'm afraid.
This is a movie about people wanting to have sex in a prudish society, that's what it boils down to. It reminded me of Narciso negro (1947).
Everybody in the story is forced into their role, and where we look further into the characters, we see they all want to escape that role. Millie is the sensible one, but she secretly smokes and wants to be fun and attractive just like Madge. Madge is the pretty one who desperately wants to be seen as more than a beautiful girl. Flo has sacrificed her life for her daughters and is not happy. Hal is a misfit who wants to better himself, and in that sense he is one of the most commendable characters in the story.
The casting of William Holden was a huge mistake though, a younger actor would have created a much better dynamic. It was difficult to focus on the story without getting to creeped out about this old dude seducing some teenagers.
Not a bad story and fairly interesting characters; still the film seems off. Besides the bad casting, there is some wooden acting going on at times, some of the visual gags are over-used, and the depiction of Americana must have been outdated already at the time of release. I seriously considered leaving the theatre, something I very rarely do.
It must be said the cinematography is pretty good, in step with the era of its release; Technicolor and Cinemascope. All shots are adequate, if somewhat pedestrian in composition. Technically it's well executed but it's just not very creative. Sound is good as well.
Everybody in the story is forced into their role, and where we look further into the characters, we see they all want to escape that role. Millie is the sensible one, but she secretly smokes and wants to be fun and attractive just like Madge. Madge is the pretty one who desperately wants to be seen as more than a beautiful girl. Flo has sacrificed her life for her daughters and is not happy. Hal is a misfit who wants to better himself, and in that sense he is one of the most commendable characters in the story.
The casting of William Holden was a huge mistake though, a younger actor would have created a much better dynamic. It was difficult to focus on the story without getting to creeped out about this old dude seducing some teenagers.
Not a bad story and fairly interesting characters; still the film seems off. Besides the bad casting, there is some wooden acting going on at times, some of the visual gags are over-used, and the depiction of Americana must have been outdated already at the time of release. I seriously considered leaving the theatre, something I very rarely do.
It must be said the cinematography is pretty good, in step with the era of its release; Technicolor and Cinemascope. All shots are adequate, if somewhat pedestrian in composition. Technically it's well executed but it's just not very creative. Sound is good as well.
Encuestas realizadas recientemente
7 en total de las encuestas realizadas