stargirl42792
oct 2004 se unió
Te damos la bienvenida a nuevo perfil
Nuestras actualizaciones aún están en desarrollo. Si bien la versión anterior de el perfil ya no está disponible, estamos trabajando activamente en mejoras, ¡y algunas de las funciones que faltan regresarán pronto! Mantente al tanto para su regreso. Mientras tanto, el análisis de calificaciones sigue disponible en nuestras aplicaciones para iOS y Android, en la página de perfil. Para ver la distribución de tus calificaciones por año y género, consulta nuestra nueva Guía de ayuda.
Distintivos2
Para saber cómo ganar distintivos, ve a página de ayuda de distintivos.
Reseñas6
Clasificación de stargirl42792
Let's face it. Ashton Kutcher was never a genius. But even his wild, immature antics on "Punk'd" can be justified compared to the pure stupidity of the contestants on "Beauty and the Geek." Actually, it's more like "Selfish, Stereotype Hottie and the Pathetic Loser." This reality show is basically a cross between a dating show and a college thesis experiment. It takes a certain number of average, somewhat pathetic, guys, most with freakishly high IQ's, and forces them to live in a mansion with an equal number of extremely hot, shallow girls that they get to drool over. And they aren't exactly Ivy-Leauge material. Each girl is paired up with a guy who, to their dismay, is their roommate. In each episode, both the guy and the girl educate the other to face two different challenges, including how to change a tire and to salsa dance. In the end, two teams face off, and one is eliminated.
The idea itself isn't bad. Changing someone's shallow judgment on national TV through a reality show sounds interesting. But the pure, undeniable stupidity of the female contestants takes away from the power that this show could have. Watching them fail a fifth grade geography test isn't funny, especially when the girls are in front of an audience. And the chemistry between a 'Geek' and a 'Beauty' is crushing to watch knowing that her adorable, lovable partner has a crush on her.
Some good lessons do come out of the show. Very early into the series, almost everyone has learned not to judge a book by its cover, and they are heartbroken at the thought of leaving each other. But it happens too early. The entire theme basically is destroyed, and we're bored again. In the end, it softens up on the Beauties and helps the Geeks with their less-than-adequate people skills. They all are left with some moral and educational lessons. And we're stuck wondering why such nice guys couldn't get dates before, regardless of how they look.
Though it might soften your superficial heart a little, it isn't as entertaining as it is cruel and embarrassing. Extreme Makeover: Home Edition is better.
The idea itself isn't bad. Changing someone's shallow judgment on national TV through a reality show sounds interesting. But the pure, undeniable stupidity of the female contestants takes away from the power that this show could have. Watching them fail a fifth grade geography test isn't funny, especially when the girls are in front of an audience. And the chemistry between a 'Geek' and a 'Beauty' is crushing to watch knowing that her adorable, lovable partner has a crush on her.
Some good lessons do come out of the show. Very early into the series, almost everyone has learned not to judge a book by its cover, and they are heartbroken at the thought of leaving each other. But it happens too early. The entire theme basically is destroyed, and we're bored again. In the end, it softens up on the Beauties and helps the Geeks with their less-than-adequate people skills. They all are left with some moral and educational lessons. And we're stuck wondering why such nice guys couldn't get dates before, regardless of how they look.
Though it might soften your superficial heart a little, it isn't as entertaining as it is cruel and embarrassing. Extreme Makeover: Home Edition is better.
Just like Jello, this movie is enjoyable, bouncy, entertainment, with no real nutritional value or taste.
The plot isn't exactly original. It starts when a couple, the Bakers, die, leaving behind a decent-sized fortune to their kids, Ruby and Rhett. After their death, the kids are adopted by another couple. (They don't exactly live in a glass house. Just a nice mansion with lots of windows.) At first, the couple seem like they're trying to make the kids comfortable at home. However, after awile, the kids start to suspect that their new parents are after their inheritance.
The script is great, as well as the acting. Leelee Sobieski, playing Ruby, steals every scene, expressing strength and vulnerability. And Trevor Morgan (Rhett) displays some sparks of talent. But it all feels so clichéd'. The plot has been used a million times before, and there are too many dramatic action scenes. It also leaves you wondering something: Why would two adults that rich want to kill two teenagers just for some extra cash?
The creators of this film weren't too creative, but the cast covers it up decent enough. After all, it could be worse. They could've thought up a "Glitter" sequel instead.
The plot isn't exactly original. It starts when a couple, the Bakers, die, leaving behind a decent-sized fortune to their kids, Ruby and Rhett. After their death, the kids are adopted by another couple. (They don't exactly live in a glass house. Just a nice mansion with lots of windows.) At first, the couple seem like they're trying to make the kids comfortable at home. However, after awile, the kids start to suspect that their new parents are after their inheritance.
The script is great, as well as the acting. Leelee Sobieski, playing Ruby, steals every scene, expressing strength and vulnerability. And Trevor Morgan (Rhett) displays some sparks of talent. But it all feels so clichéd'. The plot has been used a million times before, and there are too many dramatic action scenes. It also leaves you wondering something: Why would two adults that rich want to kill two teenagers just for some extra cash?
The creators of this film weren't too creative, but the cast covers it up decent enough. After all, it could be worse. They could've thought up a "Glitter" sequel instead.
There isn't much to say about this movie other than it bored me out of my mind. Seriously. I yawned all throughout it in the theater.
The plot is senseless and unbelievable-and not in a good, entertaining way. It focuses on two twin sisters living in New York, livin' the good life with their typical cliché' of a workaholic father. As always, Ashley Olsen plays the conservative, uptight, college-bound sister that seems even more compulsive than me, and Mary Kate plays the rebel. Somehow, on her way to a college interview, Jane Ryan (Ashley) loses her stupid date book, runs into Roxy (Mary Kate), and they get entangled in a black market scam. In the meantime, Roxy is also chased by a guy who thinks he's MacGyver (Eugene Levy), to catch her ditching school. Confused? It doesn't make much sense if you see it, either.
Every scene, it feels like it might get funnier, but then throws in another immature joke or cliché', and the audience is disappointed again. It's an endless excuse for Mary-Kate and Ashley to parade around naked. And to tote around the ugliest little bald dog that the plot includes. Some parts actually do border on being mildly stimulating, like one minute of it.
In short, IT SUCKS! For sisters worth 2 billion, you'd think that they would put some money, time, or effort into their first feature film.
The plot is senseless and unbelievable-and not in a good, entertaining way. It focuses on two twin sisters living in New York, livin' the good life with their typical cliché' of a workaholic father. As always, Ashley Olsen plays the conservative, uptight, college-bound sister that seems even more compulsive than me, and Mary Kate plays the rebel. Somehow, on her way to a college interview, Jane Ryan (Ashley) loses her stupid date book, runs into Roxy (Mary Kate), and they get entangled in a black market scam. In the meantime, Roxy is also chased by a guy who thinks he's MacGyver (Eugene Levy), to catch her ditching school. Confused? It doesn't make much sense if you see it, either.
Every scene, it feels like it might get funnier, but then throws in another immature joke or cliché', and the audience is disappointed again. It's an endless excuse for Mary-Kate and Ashley to parade around naked. And to tote around the ugliest little bald dog that the plot includes. Some parts actually do border on being mildly stimulating, like one minute of it.
In short, IT SUCKS! For sisters worth 2 billion, you'd think that they would put some money, time, or effort into their first feature film.