josedavid71
feb 2005 se unió
Te damos la bienvenida a nuevo perfil
Nuestras actualizaciones aún están en desarrollo. Si bien la versión anterior de el perfil ya no está disponible, estamos trabajando activamente en mejoras, ¡y algunas de las funciones que faltan regresarán pronto! Mantente al tanto para su regreso. Mientras tanto, el análisis de calificaciones sigue disponible en nuestras aplicaciones para iOS y Android, en la página de perfil. Para ver la distribución de tus calificaciones por año y género, consulta nuestra nueva Guía de ayuda.
Distintivos2
Para saber cómo ganar distintivos, ve a página de ayuda de distintivos.
Calificaciones163
Clasificación de josedavid71
Reseñas9
Clasificación de josedavid71
This movie was a pleasant surprise. It was a little weird at first but then things started falling into place. Places chosen for filming, acting, dialogue, chemistry. It was all there and just a cast of 2. If I would critique anything and it's not only in this movie but with a lot of foreign films, it's the constant smoking BUT that's just a personal preference I guess.
I've seen films shot using phome cameras that are better than this. This was just a BAD movie. The acting was terrible. What was Christopher Lambert thinking. Not that he's a critically accalaimed actor or anything. The writing was terrible. Scenes were stitched together with some not making any sense in sequence of events. I love vampire movies and some of them are pretty cheesy but entertaining at least. Not this film.
This movie paled in comparison to the original and I'm aware that the original was also panned. This was a huge disappointment. I can't think of not one redeeming quality. The acting was bad (1 star) and the graphics were a bit better than the acting but not by much (1 star). The storyline tried to mimic the first but failed because of the previous reasons noted. So sad :0(...
Encuestas realizadas recientemente
5 en total de las encuestas realizadas
