gurkpeter
dic 2004 se unió
Te damos la bienvenida a nuevo perfil
Nuestras actualizaciones aún están en desarrollo. Si bien la versión anterior de el perfil ya no está disponible, estamos trabajando activamente en mejoras, ¡y algunas de las funciones que faltan regresarán pronto! Mantente al tanto para su regreso. Mientras tanto, el análisis de calificaciones sigue disponible en nuestras aplicaciones para iOS y Android, en la página de perfil. Para ver la distribución de tus calificaciones por año y género, consulta nuestra nueva Guía de ayuda.
Distintivos2
Para saber cómo ganar distintivos, ve a página de ayuda de distintivos.
Reseñas10
Clasificación de gurkpeter
The documentary is an exceptional 10 year long story showing a scientist Henry Markram and his team of scientists who won the lottery of 1Bn EUR for their scam project.
The film was a very captivating experience for me depicting not just pure rationality (science) but persons and some emotion of the characters. The documentary may be most interesting to scientists but is certainly a recommendable for the general audience.
The reason I cannot give 10 stars to this great film is that I feel the authors were a bit too forgiving to their 'hero'. They mostly fail to touch the question: "how could he make such a scam happen", what sort of political meddling is part of the system that allows so much money being so much mistargeted. They avoid the question of responsibility. Maybe because so many scientist were involved who wanted to have the bits falling off the table? It would have been interesting to ask a few politicians, EU bureaucrats: how could they fail to spot the scam? This would show how little most politicians cared and care ever since. Well, at least the completely mishandled COVID crisis shows how difficult it is to understand science and relate it to actual problems of our society.
The film was a very captivating experience for me depicting not just pure rationality (science) but persons and some emotion of the characters. The documentary may be most interesting to scientists but is certainly a recommendable for the general audience.
The reason I cannot give 10 stars to this great film is that I feel the authors were a bit too forgiving to their 'hero'. They mostly fail to touch the question: "how could he make such a scam happen", what sort of political meddling is part of the system that allows so much money being so much mistargeted. They avoid the question of responsibility. Maybe because so many scientist were involved who wanted to have the bits falling off the table? It would have been interesting to ask a few politicians, EU bureaucrats: how could they fail to spot the scam? This would show how little most politicians cared and care ever since. Well, at least the completely mishandled COVID crisis shows how difficult it is to understand science and relate it to actual problems of our society.
This film is not fitting at all into most of today's movie styles. The story is quite simple and this simplicity renders the film into a powerful piece of art. The story is told in a dry manner - dry like the desert people try to survive. There is nothing to live on, except their faith. Three main characters present how faith can empower people: faith in material resurrection (thief getting "his" hidden money), faith in keeping the traditions (the guard) and faith in getting back to old state of the world (father hoping for rain in the desert).
There are many elements in the film that makes it very much worth watching, indeed not just once. There are no spectacular elements in the whole movie, just the accurate but still compassionate depiction of what motivates three people in a hopeless village in the desert.
The creator humbly presents the reality most human beings have to face, far away from the busy centres of economic and cultural life. Watch it and make the effort to internalise the message.