[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendario de lanzamientosTop 250 películasPelículas más popularesBuscar películas por géneroTaquilla superiorHorarios y entradasNoticias sobre películasPelículas de la India destacadas
    Programas de televisión y streamingLas 250 mejores seriesSeries más popularesBuscar series por géneroNoticias de TV
    Qué verÚltimos trailersTítulos originales de IMDbSelecciones de IMDbDestacado de IMDbGuía de entretenimiento familiarPodcasts de IMDb
    EmmysSuperheroes GuideSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideBest Of 2025 So FarDisability Pride MonthPremios STARmeterInformación sobre premiosInformación sobre festivalesTodos los eventos
    Nacidos un día como hoyCelebridades más popularesNoticias sobre celebridades
    Centro de ayudaZona de colaboradoresEncuestas
Para profesionales de la industria
  • Idioma
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista de visualización
Iniciar sesión
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usar app
Imagen de perfil de skyhawk77

skyhawk77

ago 2010 se unió
Te damos la bienvenida a nuevo perfil
Nuestras actualizaciones aún están en desarrollo. Si bien la versión anterior de el perfil ya no está disponible, estamos trabajando activamente en mejoras, ¡y algunas de las funciones que faltan regresarán pronto! Mantente al tanto para su regreso. Mientras tanto, el análisis de calificaciones sigue disponible en nuestras aplicaciones para iOS y Android, en la página de perfil. Para ver la distribución de tus calificaciones por año y género, consulta nuestra nueva Guía de ayuda.

Distintivos3

Para saber cómo ganar distintivos, ve a página de ayuda de distintivos.
Explora los distintivos

Calificaciones125

Clasificación de skyhawk77
Better Call Saul
9.09
Better Call Saul
Everyone's Waiting
9.910
Everyone's Waiting
Los asesinos de la luna
7.66
Los asesinos de la luna
Oppenheimer
8.36
Oppenheimer
Wonderful World
6.07
Wonderful World
El padrino (parte III)
7.65
El padrino (parte III)
Avatar: El Camino Del Agua
7.57
Avatar: El Camino Del Agua
Tali's Baby Diary
8.67
Tali's Baby Diary
¡Nop!
6.85
¡Nop!
Kedibone
4.35
Kedibone
Top Gun: Maverick
8.25
Top Gun: Maverick
More Time
5.77
More Time
El irlandés
7.85
El irlandés
Titanic
7.99
Titanic
Avatar
7.98
Avatar
Terminator: Destino oculto
6.25
Terminator: Destino oculto
Nuestra Finca
8.59
Nuestra Finca
Home Rooms
8.68
Home Rooms
Love Lives Here
7.56
Love Lives Here
Unmarried
7.95
Unmarried
Skeem Saam
8.78
Skeem Saam
Lockdown
9.25
Lockdown
Battle Angel: la última guerrera
7.37
Battle Angel: la última guerrera
Middle Ground
9.69
Middle Ground
Boomerang
5.68
Boomerang

Reseñas21

Clasificación de skyhawk77
Los asesinos de la luna

Los asesinos de la luna

7.6
6
  • 10 ene 2024
  • The Novel Was a Great Script On Its Own

    During pre-production it was in the news that Eric Roth the Academy Award winning writer who co-wrote the script was at Logger heads with Leonardo DiCaprio. Leo was supposed to play Tom White - the lead FBI Agent who solves the whole plot but is highly understated in the film. The script was re-written to accommodate him and he changed roles.

    Tom Cruise, Leonardo Dicaprio, Will Smith, etc are great actors but have way too much creative control that sometimes it is not a good thing. Had Apple Inc hired lesser known actors which this film needed and a non-fussy director like Francis Lawrence this movie would be battling Oppenheimer at award ceremonies.

    All they had to do was stick to the script which reads like a movie. It is in the last chapters of the novel that the audience know who the killers and their leader are. But in the film we get a hint who it is in the opening hour and a while later definitely know who is calling the shots which make the whole film way too long.

    Marty is losing it that is why he can't get funding at traditional studios and has to get it from streaming companies.
    Oppenheimer

    Oppenheimer

    8.3
    6
  • 18 nov 2023
  • Nothing Special

    A beautiful mind (2002)- John Nash Jobs (2013) - Steve Jobs Gifted hands (2009) - Ben Carson Sully (2016) - Chesley Sullenberger Aviator (2003) - Howard Hughes Downfall (2004) - Hitler Imitation game (2014) - Alan Turing The theory of everything (2014) - Stephen Hawking Ray (2004) - Ray Charles Lincoln (2012) - Abraham Lincoln Invincible (2006) - Vince Papale Devil wears Prada (2006) - Anna Wintour Ali (2001) - Muhammad Ali Selena (1997) - Selena Quintanilla Fighter (2010) - Micky Ward & Dicky Eklund Labamba (1987) - Ritchie Valens Malcom X (1992) - Malcom X Introducing Dorothy Dandridge (1999) - Dorothy Dandridge Molly's game (2017) - Molly Bloom Goodfellas (1990) - Henry Hill

    Above are autobiographical movies, year of release and the name of the person the movie is about.

    Oppenheimer is one of hundreds of autobiographical movies. It is 3 hours long and in two parts - 1) The Physics of making a nuclear bomb 2) The politics

    The casting is wrong. At least Oppenheimer could have been played by a "newbie" to make it completely believable. This is not to say Cilliian Murphy is not believable, he is and does a great job but we have seen him as a physco in Red eye and other different roles. Christopher Nolan does not need stars, he is the star.
    Avatar: El Camino Del Agua

    Avatar: El Camino Del Agua

    7.5
    7
  • 15 dic 2022
  • James Cameron's Weakest Movie Yet

    James Cameron is an intelligent man. He says if he did not make it in Hollywood he would have gone to university and studied engineering. He has also said several times that Avatar released in 2009 was to showcase the technology and not about the plot. But it took me several years to figure out that Avatar is Pocahontas in space because it is well directed and a visual spectacle.

    The sequel follows the same trajectory and it is underwhelming. I am not even convinced if it was necessary. Maybe that's why it took 13 years to be released because James himself might have not been sure about a sequel. The visuals are out of this world probably the best yet. I kept reminding myself that it is CGI and not real. James has set the benchmark once again. That's how good the visuals are. But the story is sub par. I was expecting a better story since five writers including James wrote this screenplay including the couple who wrote the recent Planet of the Apes films.

    Despite the weak plot, I cannot give this movie a 6 as it means below average. I give it a 7 because James did a great job creating Pandora. The fauna and flora seemed like what animals and vegetation would look like on other planets. The spirituality of the Nav'i and their close links to their animals is something Mankind should learn from.
    Ver todas las reseñas

    Visto recientemente

    Habilita las cookies del navegador para usar esta función. Más información.
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    Inicia sesión para obtener más accesoInicia sesión para obtener más acceso
    Sigue a IMDb en las redes sociales
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    Para Android e iOS
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    • Ayuda
    • Índice del sitio
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licencia de datos de IMDb
    • Sala de prensa
    • Publicidad
    • Trabaja con nosotros
    • Condiciones de uso
    • Política de privacidad
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, una compañía de Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.