skyhawk77
ago 2010 se unió
Te damos la bienvenida a nuevo perfil
Nuestras actualizaciones aún están en desarrollo. Si bien la versión anterior de el perfil ya no está disponible, estamos trabajando activamente en mejoras, ¡y algunas de las funciones que faltan regresarán pronto! Mantente al tanto para su regreso. Mientras tanto, el análisis de calificaciones sigue disponible en nuestras aplicaciones para iOS y Android, en la página de perfil. Para ver la distribución de tus calificaciones por año y género, consulta nuestra nueva Guía de ayuda.
Distintivos3
Para saber cómo ganar distintivos, ve a página de ayuda de distintivos.
Calificaciones125
Clasificación de skyhawk77
Reseñas21
Clasificación de skyhawk77
During pre-production it was in the news that Eric Roth the Academy Award winning writer who co-wrote the script was at Logger heads with Leonardo DiCaprio. Leo was supposed to play Tom White - the lead FBI Agent who solves the whole plot but is highly understated in the film. The script was re-written to accommodate him and he changed roles.
Tom Cruise, Leonardo Dicaprio, Will Smith, etc are great actors but have way too much creative control that sometimes it is not a good thing. Had Apple Inc hired lesser known actors which this film needed and a non-fussy director like Francis Lawrence this movie would be battling Oppenheimer at award ceremonies.
All they had to do was stick to the script which reads like a movie. It is in the last chapters of the novel that the audience know who the killers and their leader are. But in the film we get a hint who it is in the opening hour and a while later definitely know who is calling the shots which make the whole film way too long.
Marty is losing it that is why he can't get funding at traditional studios and has to get it from streaming companies.
Tom Cruise, Leonardo Dicaprio, Will Smith, etc are great actors but have way too much creative control that sometimes it is not a good thing. Had Apple Inc hired lesser known actors which this film needed and a non-fussy director like Francis Lawrence this movie would be battling Oppenheimer at award ceremonies.
All they had to do was stick to the script which reads like a movie. It is in the last chapters of the novel that the audience know who the killers and their leader are. But in the film we get a hint who it is in the opening hour and a while later definitely know who is calling the shots which make the whole film way too long.
Marty is losing it that is why he can't get funding at traditional studios and has to get it from streaming companies.
A beautiful mind (2002)- John Nash
Jobs (2013) - Steve Jobs
Gifted hands (2009) - Ben Carson
Sully (2016) - Chesley Sullenberger
Aviator (2003) - Howard Hughes
Downfall (2004) - Hitler
Imitation game (2014) - Alan Turing
The theory of everything (2014) - Stephen Hawking
Ray (2004) - Ray Charles
Lincoln (2012) - Abraham Lincoln
Invincible (2006) - Vince Papale
Devil wears Prada (2006) - Anna Wintour
Ali (2001) - Muhammad Ali
Selena (1997) - Selena Quintanilla
Fighter (2010) - Micky Ward & Dicky Eklund
Labamba (1987) - Ritchie Valens
Malcom X (1992) - Malcom X
Introducing Dorothy Dandridge (1999) - Dorothy Dandridge
Molly's game (2017) - Molly Bloom
Goodfellas (1990) - Henry Hill
Above are autobiographical movies, year of release and the name of the person the movie is about.
Oppenheimer is one of hundreds of autobiographical movies. It is 3 hours long and in two parts - 1) The Physics of making a nuclear bomb 2) The politics
The casting is wrong. At least Oppenheimer could have been played by a "newbie" to make it completely believable. This is not to say Cilliian Murphy is not believable, he is and does a great job but we have seen him as a physco in Red eye and other different roles. Christopher Nolan does not need stars, he is the star.
Above are autobiographical movies, year of release and the name of the person the movie is about.
Oppenheimer is one of hundreds of autobiographical movies. It is 3 hours long and in two parts - 1) The Physics of making a nuclear bomb 2) The politics
The casting is wrong. At least Oppenheimer could have been played by a "newbie" to make it completely believable. This is not to say Cilliian Murphy is not believable, he is and does a great job but we have seen him as a physco in Red eye and other different roles. Christopher Nolan does not need stars, he is the star.
James Cameron is an intelligent man. He says if he did not make it in Hollywood he would have gone to university and studied engineering. He has also said several times that Avatar released in 2009 was to showcase the technology and not about the plot. But it took me several years to figure out that Avatar is Pocahontas in space because it is well directed and a visual spectacle.
The sequel follows the same trajectory and it is underwhelming. I am not even convinced if it was necessary. Maybe that's why it took 13 years to be released because James himself might have not been sure about a sequel. The visuals are out of this world probably the best yet. I kept reminding myself that it is CGI and not real. James has set the benchmark once again. That's how good the visuals are. But the story is sub par. I was expecting a better story since five writers including James wrote this screenplay including the couple who wrote the recent Planet of the Apes films.
Despite the weak plot, I cannot give this movie a 6 as it means below average. I give it a 7 because James did a great job creating Pandora. The fauna and flora seemed like what animals and vegetation would look like on other planets. The spirituality of the Nav'i and their close links to their animals is something Mankind should learn from.
The sequel follows the same trajectory and it is underwhelming. I am not even convinced if it was necessary. Maybe that's why it took 13 years to be released because James himself might have not been sure about a sequel. The visuals are out of this world probably the best yet. I kept reminding myself that it is CGI and not real. James has set the benchmark once again. That's how good the visuals are. But the story is sub par. I was expecting a better story since five writers including James wrote this screenplay including the couple who wrote the recent Planet of the Apes films.
Despite the weak plot, I cannot give this movie a 6 as it means below average. I give it a 7 because James did a great job creating Pandora. The fauna and flora seemed like what animals and vegetation would look like on other planets. The spirituality of the Nav'i and their close links to their animals is something Mankind should learn from.