shovon-1
dic 2002 se unió
Te damos la bienvenida a nuevo perfil
Nuestras actualizaciones aún están en desarrollo. Si bien la versión anterior de el perfil ya no está disponible, estamos trabajando activamente en mejoras, ¡y algunas de las funciones que faltan regresarán pronto! Mantente al tanto para su regreso. Mientras tanto, el análisis de calificaciones sigue disponible en nuestras aplicaciones para iOS y Android, en la página de perfil. Para ver la distribución de tus calificaciones por año y género, consulta nuestra nueva Guía de ayuda.
Distintivos5
Para saber cómo ganar distintivos, ve a página de ayuda de distintivos.
Calificaciones170
Clasificación de shovon-1
Reseñas77
Clasificación de shovon-1
In the vault sequence, Bob is found in a single sarcophagus-style chamber. However, earlier in the film a photo shows that Project
But in the vault scene, the camera only shows:
One sarcophagus-style pod (the one Bob emerges from).
No trace of other pods - not even destroyed, dismantled, or empty ones.
Sentry had multiple test subjects. Logically, the vault should have contained several pods (damaged, empty, or otherwise). Showing only one chamber makes it appear as if Bob was deliberately preserved, contradicting Valentina's claim that all subjects were presumed dead.
Unless Marvel later hand-waves it (e.g., saying the other pods were destroyed earlier, or this vault was just a secondary site), it's a classic MCU shortcut for dramatic reveal rather than airtight continuity.
No trace of other pods - not even destroyed, dismantled, or empty ones.
Sentry had multiple test subjects. Logically, the vault should have contained several pods (damaged, empty, or otherwise). Showing only one chamber makes it appear as if Bob was deliberately preserved, contradicting Valentina's claim that all subjects were presumed dead.
Unless Marvel later hand-waves it (e.g., saying the other pods were destroyed earlier, or this vault was just a secondary site), it's a classic MCU shortcut for dramatic reveal rather than airtight continuity.
I relished this movie when I first saw it in 1992, and after all these years, I watched it again in 2024. In fact, it has more meaning to me today than it did when I was in my 20s, a young strapping Lad ...hyuk hyuk.. when it first came out. Even back then, I enjoyed it and might have rated it a 7 or 7.5. I would have done that based more purely on the special effects of that time-which were like a 'wow' considering early 90's standards. While less on the vanity, fake and pomposity of the two female leads, the gaudiness they are always trying to achieve.
In the scenario, the two female leads are putting on an air of grandeur that is exaggerated and artificial, projecting a sense of pomposity that borders on the ridiculous. They are clearly trying to cultivate an image of luxury and sophistication, but instead, they come across as overly theatrical and contrived, dripping with insincerity. Their desire to stand out, rather than being admired for elegance, feels like a shallow spectacle of extravagance, masking deeper flaws of character.
I'm certain that everyone who is aging, maturing, and gaining experience will watch it with totally different eyes....and if they scoff, they'll have to make this voyage... again a sneaky 'hyuk hyuk' here.
As time goes on, you start to appreciate more and more what a classic it is, like vintage wine. Compared to the utter nonsense and garbage we're served nowadays, this movie stands the test of time (the ravages of time) and easily gets a straight 10 from me.
It's a black comedy-I found the Sydney Pollack cameo an absolute riot -it's philosophical, with lines like, "Have you ever seen a neighbor in L. A. in the last 12 years?" And, of course, you really need to pay attention to the generic sublime message being conveyed.
Zemeckis expertly blended gothic aesthetics, satire, and supernatural elements, creating an atmosphere that's both stylish and macabre. A real Zemeckis craftwork.
This one's a Cult, no two doubts about that.
In the scenario, the two female leads are putting on an air of grandeur that is exaggerated and artificial, projecting a sense of pomposity that borders on the ridiculous. They are clearly trying to cultivate an image of luxury and sophistication, but instead, they come across as overly theatrical and contrived, dripping with insincerity. Their desire to stand out, rather than being admired for elegance, feels like a shallow spectacle of extravagance, masking deeper flaws of character.
I'm certain that everyone who is aging, maturing, and gaining experience will watch it with totally different eyes....and if they scoff, they'll have to make this voyage... again a sneaky 'hyuk hyuk' here.
As time goes on, you start to appreciate more and more what a classic it is, like vintage wine. Compared to the utter nonsense and garbage we're served nowadays, this movie stands the test of time (the ravages of time) and easily gets a straight 10 from me.
It's a black comedy-I found the Sydney Pollack cameo an absolute riot -it's philosophical, with lines like, "Have you ever seen a neighbor in L. A. in the last 12 years?" And, of course, you really need to pay attention to the generic sublime message being conveyed.
Zemeckis expertly blended gothic aesthetics, satire, and supernatural elements, creating an atmosphere that's both stylish and macabre. A real Zemeckis craftwork.
This one's a Cult, no two doubts about that.
Encuestas realizadas recientemente
11 en total de las encuestas realizadas