aguilera-felipe
sep 2011 se unió
Te damos la bienvenida a nuevo perfil
Nuestras actualizaciones aún están en desarrollo. Si bien la versión anterior de el perfil ya no está disponible, estamos trabajando activamente en mejoras, ¡y algunas de las funciones que faltan regresarán pronto! Mantente al tanto para su regreso. Mientras tanto, el análisis de calificaciones sigue disponible en nuestras aplicaciones para iOS y Android, en la página de perfil. Para ver la distribución de tus calificaciones por año y género, consulta nuestra nueva Guía de ayuda.
Distintivos2
Para saber cómo ganar distintivos, ve a página de ayuda de distintivos.
Calificaciones1.8 k
Clasificación de aguilera-felipe
Reseñas8
Clasificación de aguilera-felipe
Synopsis
Based on a book Dylan Goes Electric! By Elijah Wald this movie focuses on the early years of Bob Dylan's career, during his arrival to New York City and the explosive ascent into the folk music scene. This biography explores his human relationship, the evolution of his musical style and his mysterious personality.
What I Liked Timothée Chalamet's performance is a fantastic portrayal of Dylan, without even knowing all of Dylan myself, the involvement, mannerisms, attitude and of course, the voice while talking and singing is remarkable. Apparently, Chalamet is everywhere now, but with this level of commitment and performance, he can keep conquering the world of acting.
The production level, photography, and adaptation of the 60's in New York is stunning, raw, sad and crowded. The sets and the scenes shine with details.
The film is a particularly efficient way to engage with the legend of Bob Dylan. It seamlessly integrates his early songs into the narrative, providing context and a good approach to know more of the folk movement and of course, Dylan's rising.
Dylan's commitment for his art is a big part of the movie, but I also really appreciate that, as most talented obsessive people. He is also seen as a flawed and "kind of an asshole" character. With lots of internal conflicts, struggling with fame, expectations, art and of course, his human relationships.
What Could Be Better The pacing of the film, even if it is not slow at all, feels a bit dragged out in the middle development of the film. Maybe because it is not a full life biopic, so the script must adapt and "cook" the main conflict with more exposition that needed, asking for a bit more patience to the spectators.
Even if the film is not presented over Dylan's point of view, everything around him feels in a way detached and not so important. It could have delved further into the complexities of their connection and its impact on his music.
The film primarily focuses on Dylan's early years, leaving out significant portions of his later career, and the way the film was advertised and presented, you can feel a bit misled. Not a big deal at all, but clearly it leaves behind a huge part of the story for further exploration.
My Insight Bob Dylan is one of those artists that I could classify as legendary, however, I do not know him. I have never seriously immersed myself in his songs, lyrics or history. So, my approach to "A Complete Unknown" had a side of discovering the film on its own merits, but also why Dylan is so influential in the history of modern music.
More than a full biography, this is focused on a particular era of his life, and his influence in the musical scene overall. It is clearly not a common biopic, more than an interesting scope into his rise, his personality, and the challenges of an artist to express his own voice no matter what, challenging the folk scene that introduced him to stardom.
Another remarkable aspect of the film is the realization that even with his enigmatic and very hermetic persona, the movie achieves to show with his connections a lot of aspects of his life, and how he resonates with Sylvie Russo, his romantic partner. The collaboration and deep connection with the singer Joan Baez, Pete Seeger, his most important supporter in his early days and Albert Grossman, his manager who personifies the good, great and disgusting of the music business.
I must admit that I have not stopped to check what the director James Mangold has done. But after quick research, I realize that the success of this movie is not a coincidence, the myth of Dylan of the impressive performance of Timothée Chalamet, is the talent to confront a story, a human view into a legend. He did a great job with Johnny Cash in Walk the Line, in Ford vs Ferrari showed us the humanity behind the engineering and search for success in the automotive competitions and even in Logan, a fiction action movie for sure, he achieved to present the violent and rough comic character in the most human possible way yet.
Rating ⭐8/10 A captivating view into the human behind the legend. Amazing adaptation of the times, impressive performance and an amazing rhythm.
Extras
Interesting movies about Rock... Inside Llewyn Davis (2013) Dir. Joen and Ethan Coen Walk the Line (2005) Dir. James Mangold Rocketman (2019) Dir. Dexter Fletcher Bohemian Rhapsody (2018) Dir. Brian Singer Control (2007) Dir. Anton Corbjin
For Discussion Getting to know Dylan a bit more, make his art for me definitely more closer and interesting, but at the same time, this portrayal of a very complex personality that in his life did behave in a lot of questionable ways, it feels less amazing, but in the same time, more approachable and relatable.
Should we meet our heroes? Are the Flaws, failings and or the scandals of his personal life can break the admiration for the artist, and especially with his art? This is a big question these days, and happens every other day, that a big, respected artist "disappoints" his followers. With acts of questionable morality or simply mistakes. Sadly, with the over-exposure on social media and the cancel-culture it does not make it easier.
What I Liked Timothée Chalamet's performance is a fantastic portrayal of Dylan, without even knowing all of Dylan myself, the involvement, mannerisms, attitude and of course, the voice while talking and singing is remarkable. Apparently, Chalamet is everywhere now, but with this level of commitment and performance, he can keep conquering the world of acting.
The production level, photography, and adaptation of the 60's in New York is stunning, raw, sad and crowded. The sets and the scenes shine with details.
The film is a particularly efficient way to engage with the legend of Bob Dylan. It seamlessly integrates his early songs into the narrative, providing context and a good approach to know more of the folk movement and of course, Dylan's rising.
Dylan's commitment for his art is a big part of the movie, but I also really appreciate that, as most talented obsessive people. He is also seen as a flawed and "kind of an asshole" character. With lots of internal conflicts, struggling with fame, expectations, art and of course, his human relationships.
What Could Be Better The pacing of the film, even if it is not slow at all, feels a bit dragged out in the middle development of the film. Maybe because it is not a full life biopic, so the script must adapt and "cook" the main conflict with more exposition that needed, asking for a bit more patience to the spectators.
Even if the film is not presented over Dylan's point of view, everything around him feels in a way detached and not so important. It could have delved further into the complexities of their connection and its impact on his music.
The film primarily focuses on Dylan's early years, leaving out significant portions of his later career, and the way the film was advertised and presented, you can feel a bit misled. Not a big deal at all, but clearly it leaves behind a huge part of the story for further exploration.
My Insight Bob Dylan is one of those artists that I could classify as legendary, however, I do not know him. I have never seriously immersed myself in his songs, lyrics or history. So, my approach to "A Complete Unknown" had a side of discovering the film on its own merits, but also why Dylan is so influential in the history of modern music.
More than a full biography, this is focused on a particular era of his life, and his influence in the musical scene overall. It is clearly not a common biopic, more than an interesting scope into his rise, his personality, and the challenges of an artist to express his own voice no matter what, challenging the folk scene that introduced him to stardom.
Another remarkable aspect of the film is the realization that even with his enigmatic and very hermetic persona, the movie achieves to show with his connections a lot of aspects of his life, and how he resonates with Sylvie Russo, his romantic partner. The collaboration and deep connection with the singer Joan Baez, Pete Seeger, his most important supporter in his early days and Albert Grossman, his manager who personifies the good, great and disgusting of the music business.
I must admit that I have not stopped to check what the director James Mangold has done. But after quick research, I realize that the success of this movie is not a coincidence, the myth of Dylan of the impressive performance of Timothée Chalamet, is the talent to confront a story, a human view into a legend. He did a great job with Johnny Cash in Walk the Line, in Ford vs Ferrari showed us the humanity behind the engineering and search for success in the automotive competitions and even in Logan, a fiction action movie for sure, he achieved to present the violent and rough comic character in the most human possible way yet.
Rating ⭐8/10 A captivating view into the human behind the legend. Amazing adaptation of the times, impressive performance and an amazing rhythm.
Extras
Interesting movies about Rock... Inside Llewyn Davis (2013) Dir. Joen and Ethan Coen Walk the Line (2005) Dir. James Mangold Rocketman (2019) Dir. Dexter Fletcher Bohemian Rhapsody (2018) Dir. Brian Singer Control (2007) Dir. Anton Corbjin
For Discussion Getting to know Dylan a bit more, make his art for me definitely more closer and interesting, but at the same time, this portrayal of a very complex personality that in his life did behave in a lot of questionable ways, it feels less amazing, but in the same time, more approachable and relatable.
Should we meet our heroes? Are the Flaws, failings and or the scandals of his personal life can break the admiration for the artist, and especially with his art? This is a big question these days, and happens every other day, that a big, respected artist "disappoints" his followers. With acts of questionable morality or simply mistakes. Sadly, with the over-exposure on social media and the cancel-culture it does not make it easier.
After enjoying Furiosa in IMAX: Without a doubt, it's a magnificent visual spectacle where the action and cinematography are elevated to a very high level of intensity. However, many of the characteristics that I consider memorable from the previous film, I lost in this adventure.
This time, George Miller presents us in the midst of a power struggle between the group of The Citadel, led by Immortan Joe, and their confrontation with Dementus, leader of the Biker Horde, a violent and opportunistic nomadic group. In the midst of all the agreements, betrayals, and much violence, is Furiosa, who, after being kidnapped as a child, tries to survive and find her own path.
Although there's only a 30-minute difference between "Fury Road" and "Furiosa," there's a lack of intensity throughout Furiosa's five acts that make the film feel quite long and, at times, even tedious. I'm left with an unfortunate feeling that many of the events are mere excuses to deliver a framework that contains the fabulous choreographies where the speed and action undoubtedly shine, but it doesn't meet my expectations, possibly too high to enjoy this installment on multiple occasions.
This time, George Miller presents us in the midst of a power struggle between the group of The Citadel, led by Immortan Joe, and their confrontation with Dementus, leader of the Biker Horde, a violent and opportunistic nomadic group. In the midst of all the agreements, betrayals, and much violence, is Furiosa, who, after being kidnapped as a child, tries to survive and find her own path.
Although there's only a 30-minute difference between "Fury Road" and "Furiosa," there's a lack of intensity throughout Furiosa's five acts that make the film feel quite long and, at times, even tedious. I'm left with an unfortunate feeling that many of the events are mere excuses to deliver a framework that contains the fabulous choreographies where the speed and action undoubtedly shine, but it doesn't meet my expectations, possibly too high to enjoy this installment on multiple occasions.
"Jim Henson: Idea Man" shows us the trajectory and work of the revolutionary and visionary artist known as the mind and personality behind the Muppets. With a wide variety of interviews, supporting material, and great admiration from director Ron Howard, this documentary provides us with information that goes far beyond the creation of Kermit the Frog and his group of puppets. It's a journey through the motivation, relentless work, perseverance, and great talent of a character who, along with his wife and team, always sought to surprise, innovate, and change the possibilities that television offered.
Jim Henson is undoubtedly a pillar of creativity and positive artistic attitude in recent years, and his legacy will be indelible not only for the relevance of Sesame Street for a generation of children or the cultural phenomenon that the Muppets brought to millions of viewers. He is also a source worthy of admiration and inspiration in a world where everything may seem already defined.
Jim Henson is undoubtedly a pillar of creativity and positive artistic attitude in recent years, and his legacy will be indelible not only for the relevance of Sesame Street for a generation of children or the cultural phenomenon that the Muppets brought to millions of viewers. He is also a source worthy of admiration and inspiration in a world where everything may seem already defined.