[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendario de lanzamientosTop 250 películasPelículas más popularesBuscar películas por géneroTaquilla superiorHorarios y entradasNoticias sobre películasPelículas de la India destacadas
    Programas de televisión y streamingLas 250 mejores seriesSeries más popularesBuscar series por géneroNoticias de TV
    Qué verÚltimos trailersTítulos originales de IMDbSelecciones de IMDbDestacado de IMDbGuía de entretenimiento familiarPodcasts de IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalPremios STARmeterInformación sobre premiosInformación sobre festivalesTodos los eventos
    Nacidos un día como hoyCelebridades más popularesNoticias sobre celebridades
    Centro de ayudaZona de colaboradoresEncuestas
Para profesionales de la industria
  • Idioma
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista de visualización
Iniciar sesión
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usar app

R_O_U_S

sep 2003 se unió
A message to anyone who reads these things.

I have been using IMDB B/W less and less. I first logged on in October 2003 and it's taken until early 2006 for the attraction to wane. I'm not going to make some big statement on the board - I am not "leaving the boards". But, if there is anyone who cares enough to wonder where R_O_U_S has got to these days, hopefully this message will explain. Maybe I'll gain enthusiasm again - but, until then, I will be a sporadic visitor.

If you are reading this, please send me an IM to say so. I'm interested to know if I'm just typing to myself here.

R_O_U_S
_______________________________________

My Top 50 Directors:

1 Spielberg, Steven
GOOD: Schindler's List, Jaws, Raiders of the Lost Ark etc… BAD: Hook, AI, not much else.
2 Hitchcock, Alfred
GOOD: Rear Window, Psycho, untold others BAD: Never produced a classic outside his chosen genre
3 Reiner, Rob
GOOD: Princess Bride, Stand By Me, A Few Good Men BAD: Almost everything since the mid-90s
4 Verhoeven, Paul
GOOD: Starship Troopers, Robocop, Total recall BAD: The Hollow Man was hardly a classic
5 Tarantino, Quentin
GOOD: Reservoir Dogs, Pulp Fiction BAD: Four Rooms, Kill Bill Vol.1
6 Luhrmann, Baz
GOOD: Moulin Rouge, Romeo + Juliet BAD: Only seen 3 films.
7 Coen, Joel
GOOD: Hudsucker Proxy, Miller's Crossing, Fargo BAD: I haven't loved a film since mid-90s
8 Boyle, Danny
GOOD: Trainspotting, Shallow Grave, 28 Days Later BAD: I haven't seen The Beach yet…
9 Fincher, David
GOOD: Se7en, Fight Club, The Game, Panic Room BAD: Upcoming projects look dodgy
10 Gilliam, Terry
GOOD: Brazil, Fisher King, Twelve Monkeys BAD: Unable to make a film?

11 Cameron, James
GOOD: Aliens, Titanic, Terminator 2 BAD: Where did he go?
12 Burton, Tim
GOOD: Batman, Ed Wood, Mars Attacks!, Big Fish BAD: Planet of the Apes
13 Crowe, Cameron
GOOD: Almost Famous, Vanilla Sky BAD: Can he kieep the quality up?
14 Branagh, Kenneth
GOOD: Peter's Friends, Frankenstein, Much Ado BAD: Love's Labours Lost doesn't bode well
15 Shyamalan, M Night
GOOD: Sixth Sense, Unbreakable, Signs BAD: Becoming predictable
16 Scott, Tony
GOOD: True Romance, Crimson Tide, Enemy of the State BAD: Seems to be becoming just an action director
17 Scorsese, Martin
GOOD: Taxi Driver, Raging Bull, Color of Money etc etc BAD: Too busy lusting after Oscar
18 Stone, Oliver
GOOD: Born on the 4th July, JFK, Wall Street BAD: U-Turn
19 Coppola, Francis Ford
GOOD: Godfather Part 2, Apocalypse Now, The Conversation BAD: Almost everything else
20 Besson, Luc
GOOD: Nikita, Leon BAD: And now…?

21 Powell & Pressburger
GOOD: A Matter of Life and Death, The Red Shoes BAD: Only seen 2 films
22 Forman, Milos
GOOD: One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest, Amadeus BAD: Only seen 3 films.
23 Jackson, Peter
GOOD: Lord of the Rings, Heavenly Creatures BAD: Upcoming: King Kong??
24 Lucas, George
GOOD: Star Wars BAD: Left his directing talent in the 70s?
25 Hanson, Curtis
GOOD: LA Confidential, Hand that Rocks the Cradle BAD: The River Wild
26 Jeunet, Jean-Pierre
GOOD: City of Lost Children, Amelie, Delicatessen BAD: Destined to vanish up his own arse?
27 Kubrick, Stanley
GOOD: Spartacus, Paths of Glory, Dr Strangelove BAD: I dislike many of his classics: 2001, The Shining…
28 Capra, Frank
GOOD: It's A Wonderful Life, Mr Smith Goes To Washington BAD: Only seen 2 films
29 Carpenter, John
GOOD: The Thing, Escape from New York BAD: Career in freefall
30 Romero, George A
GOOD: Night of the Living Dead, Dawn of the Dead BAD: Only good for Dead movies

31 Zemeckis, Robert
GOOD: Back to the Future, Who Framed Roger Rabbit? BAD: Some films come across as unremarkable
32 De Palma, Brian
GOOD: Carrie, Snake Eyes, Carlito's Way BAD: Career in freefall
33 Darabont, Frank
GOOD: The Shawshank Redemption, The Majestic BAD: Only seen 2 films
34 Smith, Kevin
GOOD: Clerks, Chasing Amy, Jersey Girl BAD: Not the most versatile director
35 Raimi, Sam
GOOD: Evil Dead, Darkman, Spider-Man BAD: Has lost his edge
36 Welles, Orson
GOOD: Citizen Kane BAD: Only like one of the 3 movies I've seen
37 Peterson, Wolfgang
GOOD: Das Boot, Air Force One, Outbreak BAD: Troy
38 Inarritu, Alejandro Golzalez
GOOD: Amores Perros, 21 Grams BAD: Still at the start of his career
39 Frankenheimer, John
GOOD: Manchurian Candidate, French Connection II BAD: Only seen 3 films. One was Ronin.
40 Wachowski Brothers
GOOD: The Matrix, Bound BAD: Is there any more to come?

41 Emmerich, Roland
GOOD: Independence Day, Day After Tomorrow BAD: Godzilla, same old same old
42 Weir, Peter
GOOD: Dead Poets Society, Truman Show BAD: Green Card, The Mosquito Coast
43 Levinson, Barry
GOOD: Rain Man, Good Morning Vietnam, Bandits BAD: Sphere, Toys, Disclosure
44 McTiernan, John
GOOD: Last Action Hero, Die Hard, Predator BAD: Action movies are fine, but…
45 Lean, David
GOOD: Bridge Over The River Kwai, Brief Encounter BAD: Still only seen 3 movies.
46 Nolan, Christopher
GOOD: Memento, Batman Begins, Insomnia BAD: Let's see which way he jumps
47 Lumet, Sidney
GOOD: Dog Day Afternoon, Network, 12 Angry Men BAD: What have you done for me lately?
48 Waters, John
GOOD: Serial Mom, Pecker BAD: Only seen 2 films
49 Jonze, Spike
GOOD: Being John Malkovitch, Adaptation. BAD: Still at the start of his career
50 Hooper, Tobe
GOOD: Texas Chain Saw Massacre, Poltergeist BAD: Salem's Lot

And now...results of various tournaments from the Best & Worst board!

Steven Spielberg's movies (up to War of the Worlds) ranked:

1. Schindler's List - 6 votes
2. Raiders of the Lost Ark - 19 votes
3. Jaws - 4 votes
4. Saving Private Ryan - 6 votes
5. Jurassic Park - 10 votes
6. Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade - 6 votes {tie broken by me)
7. Empire of the Sun - 6 votes
8. Close Encounters of the Third Kind - 9 votes
9. ET The Extra Terrestrial (1982) - 6 votes (tie broken by me)
10. Amistad (1997) - 6 votes
11. The Color Purple (1985) - 7 votes
12. Minority Report (2002) - 5 votes
13. The Sugarland Express (1974) - 6 votes
14. Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom (1984) - 8 votes
15. Duel (1971) - 4 votes (tie broken by me)
16. Catch Me If You Can (2002) - 4 votes
17. 1941 (1979) - 5 votes
18. The Terminal (2004) - 3 votes
19. Always (1989) - 4 votes
20. The Lost World: Jurassic Park (1997) - 5 votes
21. War of the Worlds (2005) - 5 votes
22. Artificial Intelligence: AI (2001) - 6 votes
23. Hook (1991) - 7 votes


Results of Best Director tournaments:
BEST COMEDY DIRECTOR - Mel Brooks beat Spike Jonze in the final
BEST SCI-FI DIRECTOR - James Cameron beat Steven Spielberg in the final
BEST ACTION DIRECTOR - Steven Spielberg beat John McTiernan in the final
BEST HORROR DIRECTOR - John Carpenter beat Wes Craven in the final
BEST THRILLER DIRECTOR - Alfred Hitchcock thrashed everyone in the final
BEST ROMANCE DIRECTOR - Billy Wilder beat Cameron Crowe in the final

<tournament discontinued.
Te damos la bienvenida a nuevo perfil
Nuestras actualizaciones aún están en desarrollo. Si bien la versión anterior de el perfil ya no está disponible, estamos trabajando activamente en mejoras, ¡y algunas de las funciones que faltan regresarán pronto! Mantente al tanto para su regreso. Mientras tanto, el análisis de calificaciones sigue disponible en nuestras aplicaciones para iOS y Android, en la página de perfil. Para ver la distribución de tus calificaciones por año y género, consulta nuestra nueva Guía de ayuda.

Distintivos2

Para saber cómo ganar distintivos, ve a página de ayuda de distintivos.
Explora los distintivos

Reseñas107

Clasificación de R_O_U_S
Star Wars. Episodio III: La venganza de los sith

Star Wars. Episodio III: La venganza de los sith

7.6
7
  • 23 may 2005
  • The second half is a great movie

    Guía del viajero intergaláctico

    Guía del viajero intergaláctico

    6.7
    7
  • 2 may 2005
  • Not as good as it could have been but pretty good

    Eterno resplandor de una mente sin recuerdos

    Eterno resplandor de una mente sin recuerdos

    8.3
    8
  • 10 may 2004
  • Stylish and not wacky

    I've been looking forward to the release of this film for some time. Although the cinema trailers prepared me for the basic concepts, I have to say the structure of the movie took me slightly by surprise. The idea of your lead characters spending most of the movie in one of their heads is intriguing, and it's hard to think of anyone other than Charlie Kaufman who could have pulled it off.

    So let's start from the beginning. We witness what appears to be Joel (Jim Carrey) and Clementine's (Kate Winslet) first meeting, which all goes very well. Then, as we're settling into the movie, the opening titles finally play and we're into their break-up. The concept of Lacuna Inc is introduced – it transpires that their science-fiction tinged services have allowed Clementine to completely erase Joel from her memories. Pained by this, Joel agrees to undergo the procedure too. This occurs at his flat that night. As he sleeps, Mark Ruffalo and Elijah Wood plug him into their machine and begin to delete. The only trouble is, trapped in his own unconscious, Joel has changed his mind, and is desperately trying to keep hold of Clementine in whatever way he can.

    Although the attention-grabbing bit of this movie takes place in Jim Carrey's head, there are nice moments beyond it too. The Lacuna team are well-represented, and the sheer moral discomfort we get from seeing Dunst and Ruffalo frolic in their undies around Carrey's corpse-like form heightens Kaufman's dark vision. Dunst, in particular, is very good, and it's always nice to see Tom Wilkinson in a film. More curious is Elijah Wood, completing the foursome. It's good to report that, after all this time, it didn't seem odd to see Frodo as a human, but one has to wonder why he took the part as he has very little to do. Nonetheless, the moments he does have are very nice, and more or less set him up as the unexpected villain of the piece.

    So to the stars. Everyone's been enthusing about Kate Winslet's performance. She is good, and I don't think I've seen this character from her before, but then I always knew she was a good actress. Jim Carrey, however, makes the film his own. You know how every role he does is more or less a riff on the Carrey/Ventura persona? How, even in Truman Show, his `good afternoon, good evening and good night' schtick is still there? Well, it's not here. There is nothing of Carrey the wacky comedian in here. This is surely the performance of his career, and probably my favourite performance of the year so far.

    I really liked Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind. I can't help but feel that the central concept isn't fully explored – does no-one think that people might want to erase memories not connected with bad love affairs? This doesn't matter, so long as you take it as another in the chain of high-concept magic realism love stories that have been sprinkling smiled into our multiplexes over the past few years. Michael Gondry's direction, though showy, is slightly less flashy than Spike Jonze's in Being John Malkovich, and all the better for it. On this evidence, Kaufman is likely to remain the most important writer in America for the foreseeable future.

    8/10
    Ver todas las reseñas

    Visto recientemente

    Habilita las cookies del navegador para usar esta función. Más información.
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    Inicia sesión para obtener más accesoInicia sesión para obtener más acceso
    Sigue a IMDb en las redes sociales
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    Para Android e iOS
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    • Ayuda
    • Índice del sitio
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licencia de datos de IMDb
    • Sala de prensa
    • Publicidad
    • Trabaja con nosotros
    • Condiciones de uso
    • Política de privacidad
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, una compañía de Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.