thepringlegame
ago 2003 se unió
Te damos la bienvenida a nuevo perfil
Nuestras actualizaciones aún están en desarrollo. Si bien la versión anterior de el perfil ya no está disponible, estamos trabajando activamente en mejoras, ¡y algunas de las funciones que faltan regresarán pronto! Mantente al tanto para su regreso. Mientras tanto, el análisis de calificaciones sigue disponible en nuestras aplicaciones para iOS y Android, en la página de perfil. Para ver la distribución de tus calificaciones por año y género, consulta nuestra nueva Guía de ayuda.
Distintivos2
Para saber cómo ganar distintivos, ve a página de ayuda de distintivos.
Reseñas5
Clasificación de thepringlegame
I didn't really enjoy this film but then I didn't really hate it either. I have an exam in Experimental Cinema this afternoon and I thought this film may be of help and I'm glad I've seen it (for all that its hyped up anyway)
The lay out and lighting and general feel to the beginning of this film was untidy. I didn't like the way it reminded me of 'Eraserhead' where nothing makes sense but nothing is qustioned either. in fact there is very little communication throughout the whole film. Personally I like developed characters.
But then again, I don't particulary like surrealist films, which at the end of the day is what it is - the comedy is just a sub-genre if you like.
The point of surrealism is that there is no point. You're not meant to dig to deep into it because there is no calculated meaning. Un Chien Andelou is a perfect example of this. I can't do that though, I like meaning in films. I like things that I can understand so go figure.
However, before this film I hated John Malkovich because I had only seen him playing the retard, Lenny in Of Mice and Men (and the prospect of watching a film ABOUT him wasn't very tempting) but now I find him quite attractive. so I give John Malkovich a 4/5 but BEING John Malkovich 2/5
The lay out and lighting and general feel to the beginning of this film was untidy. I didn't like the way it reminded me of 'Eraserhead' where nothing makes sense but nothing is qustioned either. in fact there is very little communication throughout the whole film. Personally I like developed characters.
But then again, I don't particulary like surrealist films, which at the end of the day is what it is - the comedy is just a sub-genre if you like.
The point of surrealism is that there is no point. You're not meant to dig to deep into it because there is no calculated meaning. Un Chien Andelou is a perfect example of this. I can't do that though, I like meaning in films. I like things that I can understand so go figure.
However, before this film I hated John Malkovich because I had only seen him playing the retard, Lenny in Of Mice and Men (and the prospect of watching a film ABOUT him wasn't very tempting) but now I find him quite attractive. so I give John Malkovich a 4/5 but BEING John Malkovich 2/5
I have friends who love these films - NBK, Kill Bill, Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, Pulp Fiction and so on. They say they love the way it's different and origonal and so I point out that it's becoming rapidly common to see films shot on different mm reels. They tell me that the whole ensence of these films are amazing. I ask why and they gush about the flashbacks, the animation, the tackyness which makes it so sophisticated.
I'm confused, tacky is tacky to me. I liked Dusk Till Dawn - it was true to Tarranteno, for who he was at the time. now he is the favourite director of age groups 12-17 and extremely rich. His new innovation, Kill Bill, has not evolved except the special effects are extrodinary.
Me? i like the good old films that do not confuse me with a chop in time and where the characters are well developed. The beginning middle and end are very important too.
I'm confused, tacky is tacky to me. I liked Dusk Till Dawn - it was true to Tarranteno, for who he was at the time. now he is the favourite director of age groups 12-17 and extremely rich. His new innovation, Kill Bill, has not evolved except the special effects are extrodinary.
Me? i like the good old films that do not confuse me with a chop in time and where the characters are well developed. The beginning middle and end are very important too.
