idiotsavant117
ene 2007 se unió
Te damos la bienvenida a nuevo perfil
Nuestras actualizaciones aún están en desarrollo. Si bien la versión anterior de el perfil ya no está disponible, estamos trabajando activamente en mejoras, ¡y algunas de las funciones que faltan regresarán pronto! Mantente al tanto para su regreso. Mientras tanto, el análisis de calificaciones sigue disponible en nuestras aplicaciones para iOS y Android, en la página de perfil. Para ver la distribución de tus calificaciones por año y género, consulta nuestra nueva Guía de ayuda.
Distintivos3
Para saber cómo ganar distintivos, ve a página de ayuda de distintivos.
Reseñas3
Clasificación de idiotsavant117
Next is about a magician, Chris Johnson, who has the ability to see two minutes into the future, and has found a mystery girl who affects his abilities.
Next is a forgettable, somewhat clichéd, and without much meaning/direction at all. Nicolas Cage is the best actor of the lot, Biel and Moore do above average, and the rest can only pull so much from their bad roles.
If you go for all action, OK special effects, and little thinking, then this is the flick for you.
But do think of this: Do you really want to see a film with an abrupt ending, no real direction/meaning, no explanation for many of the plot elements? The motivations of the terrorists (which spur the whole plot) are unclear, making their part in the script only a plot device, the sole reason they exist.
The movie will have you somewhat entertained for its length, but is (again) forgettable and goes nowhere with clichés and overall average acting.
Next is a forgettable, somewhat clichéd, and without much meaning/direction at all. Nicolas Cage is the best actor of the lot, Biel and Moore do above average, and the rest can only pull so much from their bad roles.
If you go for all action, OK special effects, and little thinking, then this is the flick for you.
But do think of this: Do you really want to see a film with an abrupt ending, no real direction/meaning, no explanation for many of the plot elements? The motivations of the terrorists (which spur the whole plot) are unclear, making their part in the script only a plot device, the sole reason they exist.
The movie will have you somewhat entertained for its length, but is (again) forgettable and goes nowhere with clichés and overall average acting.
A fairly amusing show where Braff's character deals with a co-worker in a new job that had had a thing with his wife in high school. This comedy doesn't bring anything new to the genre, but is a fair watch overall with some interesting elements.
The Good: Appropriate length, Fair acting, Great gag reel (after some credits start rolling), amusing overall, villain is mean, but doesn't cross the line- after all comedies are not about sadistic, truly evil villains. They are usually funny, selfishly misguided people, and Bateman fits the bill perfectly.
The Bad: Too much slapstick humor, had more potential, some scenes were unfocused and with no real purpose.
The Good: Appropriate length, Fair acting, Great gag reel (after some credits start rolling), amusing overall, villain is mean, but doesn't cross the line- after all comedies are not about sadistic, truly evil villains. They are usually funny, selfishly misguided people, and Bateman fits the bill perfectly.
The Bad: Too much slapstick humor, had more potential, some scenes were unfocused and with no real purpose.
