[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendario de lanzamientosTop 250 películasPelículas más popularesBuscar películas por géneroTaquilla superiorHorarios y entradasNoticias sobre películasPelículas de la India destacadas
    Programas de televisión y streamingLas 250 mejores seriesSeries más popularesBuscar series por géneroNoticias de TV
    Qué verÚltimos trailersTítulos originales de IMDbSelecciones de IMDbDestacado de IMDbGuía de entretenimiento familiarPodcasts de IMDb
    OscarsBest Of 2025Holiday Watch GuideGotham AwardsCelebrity PhotosPremios STARmeterInformación sobre premiosInformación sobre festivalesTodos los eventos
    Nacidos un día como hoyCelebridades más popularesNoticias sobre celebridades
    Centro de ayudaZona de colaboradoresEncuestas
Para profesionales de la industria
  • Idioma
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista de visualización
Iniciar sesión
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usar app
Imagen de perfil de snoozejonc

snoozejonc

jul 2020 se unió
Scoring Guide (Films and Television Shows)

10 - Perfect in my eyes
9.5 - Brilliant with minor flaws
09 - I love it regardless of it's flaws
8.5 - Strong - with some classic moments
08 - Strong (rewatch with enthusiasm)
7.5 - Solid (would rewatch)
07 - Enjoyable but flawed (eventual rewatch)
06 - Mostly enjoyed (rewatch if I had to)
5.5 - Slightly more good than bad (or so bad it's good)
05 - Hit and miss (avoid rewatching)
04 - Mostly did not enjoy (never rewatch)
03 - Did not enjoy for lots of reasons (never rewatch)
02 - Majorly flawed and boring (never rewatch)
01 - Unprofessional

Scoring is subjective to personal tastes.

I consider writing, cinematography, editing, acting, sound, visual effects and general production values along with the era the film or television show was made.

Distintivos4

Para saber cómo ganar distintivos, ve a página de ayuda de distintivos.
Explora los distintivos

Calificaciones2.8 k

Clasificación de snoozejonc
Puerta al infierno
6.98
Puerta al infierno
Avatar: Fuego y Cenizas
7.46
Avatar: Fuego y Cenizas
Unruhe
8.07
Unruhe
Duro de matar 2
7.27
Duro de matar 2
Duro de matar
8.210
Duro de matar
Musings of a Cigarette Smoking Man
9.09
Musings of a Cigarette Smoking Man
Home
8.89
Home
Time Enough at Last
8.910
Time Enough at Last
The Lonely
8.18
The Lonely
Escape Clause
7.37
Escape Clause
Walking Distance
8.28
Walking Distance
Herrenvolk
8.48
Herrenvolk
Talitha Cumi
8.57
Talitha Cumi
Teliko
6.66
Teliko
Wetwired
8.38
Wetwired
Quagmire
8.08
Quagmire
La última casa a la izquierda
5.85
La última casa a la izquierda
El verdugo de Nueva York
6.97
El verdugo de Nueva York
Avatar
7.66
Avatar
Pusher
8.410
Pusher
Jose Chung's 'From Outer Space'
8.810
Jose Chung's 'From Outer Space'
Hell Money
7.07
Hell Money
Apocrypha
8.58
Apocrypha
Piper Maru
8.49
Piper Maru
Barrio Chino
8.110
Barrio Chino

Wish list1

  • Anthony Daniels, Carrie Fisher, Mark Hamill, James Earl Jones, David Prowse, and Kenny Baker in La guerra de las galaxias (1977)
    Star Wars Movies ranked
    • 11 títulos
    • Público
    • Modificado el 22 feb 2021

Reseñas2.8 k

Clasificación de snoozejonc
Puerta al infierno

Puerta al infierno

6.9
8
  • 28 dic 2025
  • Essential horror film

    If you are a fan of body horror, psychological dread, and stories featuring themes of sadomasochism, Hellraiser is a must-see.

    Being a young boy in the 80s, with friends who were horror movie junkies and who frequently preached its merits, I initially watched it out of curiosity. On a recent rewatch, I can see it is an impressive low-budget production, thanks to solid practical effects and a continually unsettling atmosphere.

    Although the cenobites were (and still are) the product marketed by the filmmakers, it is the human characters who are the most memorable, with the Cottons being one of the quintessential "disturbed families" in movie history. Many recognisable, underlying, repressed desires come to the surface, driving the characters to extreme behaviour, and it feels pretty shocking throughout.

    I think the plot unfolds at a measured pace, which works well, building up to the most spectacularly visual moments.

    Andrew Robinson feels unhinged at the best of times and suits his roles well. Claire Higgins is tremendous throughout, and Ashley Lawrence carries the latter portions of the film pretty well. Doug Bradley is the iconic face of the franchise and is worth much more than his 8 minutes of screen time.

    It is not perfect. I dislike the studio's post prodcution setting change to the US, which is distracting. Plus some of the practical effects, such as the engineer have not aged well, taking you out of certain key moments.
    Avatar: Fuego y Cenizas

    Avatar: Fuego y Cenizas

    7.4
    6
  • 26 dic 2025
  • Even greater visuals yet again, but more recycled storytelling

    The main reason to watch an Avatar movie is to be transported to a convincing-looking alien world and experience the action spectacle in 3D IMAX. Fire and Ash does provides this in spades. However, if you want interesting story development, keep your expectations grounded.

    As you would expect, the Na'Vi face another threat, prompting Sully and the clan into action. Cue the baddies and heroes facing off numerous times. There are new characters to give some variation, but most are used in the same way as in the previous movies by the filmmakers. For me, the antagonists are again fairly one-note. It still feels like the writers play it safe by sticking to the formula.

    Visually, it is another jaw-dropper from a technical perspective. The environments we have already seen continue to impress, and the new ones are great. The Mangkwan designs are excellent and contrast with the established designs.

    All the action is as spectacular as you would expect. Dragons swoop, machines thunder, waves crash, gunfire rumbles, whales breach, and the characters continue to mostly fight and give speeches for three and a quarter hours.

    Is it too long?

    Definitely!
    Unruhe

    T4.E4Unruhe

    Los expedientes secretos X
    8.0
    7
  • 26 dic 2025
  • Pruitt Taylor Vince elevates it

    Ver todas las reseñas

    Análisis

    Clasificación de snoozejonc

    Encuestas realizadas recientemente

    18 en total de las encuestas realizadas
    IGN's Top 35 TV Shows of All Time
    Se realizó hace 8 meses
    The Wire (2002)
    Which Incarnation of Star Trek Do You Like Best?
    Se realizó hace 8 meses
    Viaje a las estrellas (1966)
    Hyperlink Cinema
    Se realizó 23 dic 2020
    Nashville (1975)
    Top 25 one-word movie quotes ...
    Se realizó 2 oct 2020
    Orson Welles, Dorothy Comingore, and Ruth Warrick in El Ciudadano Kane (1941)
    Favourite Harry Potter film
    Se realizó 16 sep 2020
    Robbie Coltrane, Warwick Davis, Richard Harris, Rupert Grint, Daniel Radcliffe, and Emma Watson in Harry Potter y la Piedra Filosofal (2001)

    Visto recientemente

    Habilita las cookies del navegador para usar esta función. Más información.
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    Inicia sesión para obtener más accesoInicia sesión para obtener más acceso
    Sigue a IMDb en las redes sociales
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    Para Android e iOS
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    • Ayuda
    • Índice del sitio
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licencia de datos de IMDb
    • Sala de prensa
    • Publicidad
    • Trabaja con nosotros
    • Condiciones de uso
    • Política de privacidad
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, una compañía de Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.