sydmwswy

The film starts with a medium long shot. After that, we have some energetic sequences. In this film, Spielberg tells the story in such a way that we really and truly feel that we are dealing with a romantic biography with a lot of concentration, and when we realize that its concentration is not that high, it bursts our bubble. When Mitzi leaves the first house with the baby, why should we have a medium long shot? We have such a sequence in Serious Man 2009, where the director takes a long shot correctly and it is a successful sequence. In all the sequences related to the piano, we still have this ridiculous medium long shot. Maybe Spielberg wanted to show off the objective side of things with these mediums,(even more) , or maybe wanted to stay in a special point.but they only cause inconsistency. We have these mediums for all the scenes related to playing the piano and even the second school filming project... Overall, the movie needed more softness. Of course, Sam's love affair is properly executed. Why is Sam's father willing to help him to such an extent when he knows that his job is entertainment? This movie needed a stronger emotional soul (at least for a few seconds) or maybe more darkness, not in the conclusion, but in the praise of the emotions. But again, it works very well as a tough romantic drama in the face of crossing over the defined realities as much as possible (not in all cases) and while it may not be possible to live it, there are always people who know that perfect.4/75/5.

Obviously, it is not as polished as the movie "Fortress 2021" and it does not have the softness of that movie, but this Bressack movie is a compressed and logical version of the series that seeks to add some apparent depth to the core of its superficial subject,.at the same time a Little or no effort has been made to sub-category characters. And we also needed more clues. Why doesn't the hero's wife show his message to the agents in the first encounter? If it seems very natural. Talking about perison was thinkable. And honestly I haven't seen such a performance from Mr Gibson in a long time. There's is really moments in the film that you want to continue . Contrary To some other parts. Not bad at all.( You can ad 1374 and 1579 to my username to access my Instagram accounts)

. Live characters are the most important and main feature of this movie. And after that, the film has the power to transform the environment into a character. The only thing that does not fully become a character in the film is absurdity. Absurdity in relation to the First World War and history in general should relate to survival, not condemn it. History is not just the past. History is the moment when an event happened and all the factors that happened through it are connected to create a very thought-provoking image. In my opinion, this can be a very correct definition of history. (Of course, an epic definition) if absurdity condems the survival, it can act as a trigger for war and add value to it. Absurdity must be related to survival. Of course, this issue is less visible in the final parts of the film, but also in the beginning of the film. However, the very correct atmosphere of the film, without wanting to be captured by the music, not only covers this issue, but also becomes one of the most remarkable features of the work.

Also, the film is successful in conveying human emotions in a direct way, but it does not do this entirely in a cinematic way.

Of course I wanted to write this comment few days ago..