bchalker
mar 2001 se unió
Te damos la bienvenida a nuevo perfil
Nuestras actualizaciones aún están en desarrollo. Si bien la versión anterior de el perfil ya no está disponible, estamos trabajando activamente en mejoras, ¡y algunas de las funciones que faltan regresarán pronto! Mantente al tanto para su regreso. Mientras tanto, el análisis de calificaciones sigue disponible en nuestras aplicaciones para iOS y Android, en la página de perfil. Para ver la distribución de tus calificaciones por año y género, consulta nuestra nueva Guía de ayuda.
Distintivos2
Para saber cómo ganar distintivos, ve a página de ayuda de distintivos.
Reseñas3
Clasificación de bchalker
What an awful piece of Christmas special history. Songs are horribly depressing (as well as the storyline). Animation is the worst of all R/B creations (IMO).
Let's forget it was made, shall we?
Let's forget it was made, shall we?
As far as the movie itself (storyline, action, character development, etc.) is concerned, it was fair...about a 2.5/5 stars.
But on the message end ( yes, yet, another movie which does not seek to merely entertain, but to "teach"), it reeks of Mac/Linux/"Insert-any-open-source-guerilla" tactics.
It's not that the open-source debate should not go on; in fact, in many ways I agree with the premise and motivations of pro-open-source followers, but the movie came off as a very heavy-handed in it's approach to the issue. No debating, just bashing of anyone not making their code free for anyone.
One line spoke of how information should "be free to everyone...like Shakespeare and aspirin." I understand the implication, but it comes off as naive. Shakespeare made money off his scripts. His books have to be bought and paid for, at Amazon. Movie theaters certainly don't let you in for free, regardless whether MacBeth or AntiTrust is playing. And, when is the last time aspirin was given out by Bayer?
The Bill Gates analogies also came off a bit extreme. He may be cutthroat in his business practices, but by painting him as Satan incarnate, the creators looked more envious and bitter than anything.
But on the message end ( yes, yet, another movie which does not seek to merely entertain, but to "teach"), it reeks of Mac/Linux/"Insert-any-open-source-guerilla" tactics.
It's not that the open-source debate should not go on; in fact, in many ways I agree with the premise and motivations of pro-open-source followers, but the movie came off as a very heavy-handed in it's approach to the issue. No debating, just bashing of anyone not making their code free for anyone.
One line spoke of how information should "be free to everyone...like Shakespeare and aspirin." I understand the implication, but it comes off as naive. Shakespeare made money off his scripts. His books have to be bought and paid for, at Amazon. Movie theaters certainly don't let you in for free, regardless whether MacBeth or AntiTrust is playing. And, when is the last time aspirin was given out by Bayer?
The Bill Gates analogies also came off a bit extreme. He may be cutthroat in his business practices, but by painting him as Satan incarnate, the creators looked more envious and bitter than anything.
Encuestas realizadas recientemente
1 en total de la encuesta realizada
