roscoe666
jul 2002 se unió
Te damos la bienvenida a nuevo perfil
Nuestras actualizaciones aún están en desarrollo. Si bien la versión anterior de el perfil ya no está disponible, estamos trabajando activamente en mejoras, ¡y algunas de las funciones que faltan regresarán pronto! Mantente al tanto para su regreso. Mientras tanto, el análisis de calificaciones sigue disponible en nuestras aplicaciones para iOS y Android, en la página de perfil. Para ver la distribución de tus calificaciones por año y género, consulta nuestra nueva Guía de ayuda.
Distintivos3
Para saber cómo ganar distintivos, ve a página de ayuda de distintivos.
Calificaciones100
Clasificación de roscoe666
Reseñas22
Clasificación de roscoe666
I wasn't expecting much from 'A Tubi original', but I was pleasantly surprised.
The pacing was tight, it was eminently watchable and the ending (if a bit predictable) didn't detract from the overall impact, as I had earlier feared it might.
Some of the FX were a bit dodgy, but others were fine. It's a bit like they had a time limit in which to film and couldn't miss deadlines, so couldn't go back.
Judd Nelson was the best actor, but some of the other acting was indifferent.
Overall, however, I didn't pause and go to Youtube once, as I often do if a film was dragging.
As I said I was pleasantly surprised and entertained for a low budget movie.
Worth a watch.
The pacing was tight, it was eminently watchable and the ending (if a bit predictable) didn't detract from the overall impact, as I had earlier feared it might.
Some of the FX were a bit dodgy, but others were fine. It's a bit like they had a time limit in which to film and couldn't miss deadlines, so couldn't go back.
Judd Nelson was the best actor, but some of the other acting was indifferent.
Overall, however, I didn't pause and go to Youtube once, as I often do if a film was dragging.
As I said I was pleasantly surprised and entertained for a low budget movie.
Worth a watch.
So predictable and lazy it is almost an insult to the intelligence of the viewer.
The positives - competently executed, and obviously some money has been spent on the production.
The negatives - where to begin? The predictability is almost matched by the laziness of the writing. It's like watching a sub-par superhero movie, it is so unlikely.
Every so-called twist is random, yet still somehow predictable and unbelievable.
The characters are largely cyphers and stereotypes, and as such, you know exactly who will survive and who won't.
Overall, an insult to the franchise.
No animal action.
The positives - competently executed, and obviously some money has been spent on the production.
The negatives - where to begin? The predictability is almost matched by the laziness of the writing. It's like watching a sub-par superhero movie, it is so unlikely.
Every so-called twist is random, yet still somehow predictable and unbelievable.
The characters are largely cyphers and stereotypes, and as such, you know exactly who will survive and who won't.
Overall, an insult to the franchise.
No animal action.
