t_habrock
mar 2002 se unió
Te damos la bienvenida a nuevo perfil
Nuestras actualizaciones aún están en desarrollo. Si bien la versión anterior de el perfil ya no está disponible, estamos trabajando activamente en mejoras, ¡y algunas de las funciones que faltan regresarán pronto! Mantente al tanto para su regreso. Mientras tanto, el análisis de calificaciones sigue disponible en nuestras aplicaciones para iOS y Android, en la página de perfil. Para ver la distribución de tus calificaciones por año y género, consulta nuestra nueva Guía de ayuda.
Distintivos2
Para saber cómo ganar distintivos, ve a página de ayuda de distintivos.
Reseñas6
Clasificación de t_habrock
Starting at 40 minutes in, this movie did something that doesn't happen often - it surprised me again and again.
The movie begins generically enough: three drug addicted brothers living in a rural Tennessee town have no money for drugs. They decide to rob a pharmacy. The youngest brother, 15 years-old, is the lookout. He has a walkie-talkie to warn the others, however, the walkie-talkie fails when a cop shows up. The cop enters the pharmacy to investigate, surprises the two older brothers. One of them has a shotgun, and when startled, he fires, killing the officer.
The three brothers flee but are eventually caught by the tough local sheriff. Once they reach the jail, the brothers are `roughed up' by the hard-ass deputy bent on revenge. The youngest brother is charged as an adult, despite being a juvenile and only having been an accessory. There is a female social worker whose cause is keeping juveniles out of the adult criminal system and has close ties with a drug smuggler/kingpin.
The set-up may sound generic, as do the characters, but they are anything but generic. They were written realistically and portrayed with a depth that refuses to dehumanize them into stereotypes. There is no `bad' person in this movie and there is no `good' person, just people who find themselves in situations both in and out of their control.
The local sheriff runs the jail `his way' and he is not going to do any favors for the 15-year-old cop killer, but he has a deep respect for human dignity, and even has depth and emotion enough to realize that this boy still has a chance for a life. So much so, that once it's been determined the boy will be tried as an adult, he encourages, even advises, the social worker on ways to help the boy. This sheriff sees the difference between law and justice, and while his job is to maintain the former, he has an enlightened understanding of the latter and has remorse for his inability to affect justice and shows great empathy and sympathy for those caught in between.
The social worker works to protect juveniles who are being charged as adults. She cares too much for the people she represents, and has given her life to her cause. One of her main benefactors is a drug smuggler. This presents an interesting moral dilemma, as he admits his main reason for helping is because he wants "...those kids back on the street, they're my customers 'bout five steps down the line," while sublimely giving us the feeling there is more to it than that -- maybe he secretly cares, maybe he subconsciously feels guilty, maybe he is in love with the woman, more likely a combination of all three - realistic. She happily accepts his money because she feels the ends justify the means. We also find out that she likes to recreationally use cocaine, but only when visiting him because it's free and she is too poor to afford it on her own.
The drug dealer is also a surprise, he is intellectual and actually seems like a nice guy, separate from the bad things he does and the even worse things he probably has to do in the course of his job.
Soon after this the movie takes a turn that I will not reveal, I will only say that these people make hard choices, as the title implies. They make both bad decisions and good decisions, in a more realistic way then I have seen in a long time, and the ending is anything but predictable.
The movie begins generically enough: three drug addicted brothers living in a rural Tennessee town have no money for drugs. They decide to rob a pharmacy. The youngest brother, 15 years-old, is the lookout. He has a walkie-talkie to warn the others, however, the walkie-talkie fails when a cop shows up. The cop enters the pharmacy to investigate, surprises the two older brothers. One of them has a shotgun, and when startled, he fires, killing the officer.
The three brothers flee but are eventually caught by the tough local sheriff. Once they reach the jail, the brothers are `roughed up' by the hard-ass deputy bent on revenge. The youngest brother is charged as an adult, despite being a juvenile and only having been an accessory. There is a female social worker whose cause is keeping juveniles out of the adult criminal system and has close ties with a drug smuggler/kingpin.
The set-up may sound generic, as do the characters, but they are anything but generic. They were written realistically and portrayed with a depth that refuses to dehumanize them into stereotypes. There is no `bad' person in this movie and there is no `good' person, just people who find themselves in situations both in and out of their control.
The local sheriff runs the jail `his way' and he is not going to do any favors for the 15-year-old cop killer, but he has a deep respect for human dignity, and even has depth and emotion enough to realize that this boy still has a chance for a life. So much so, that once it's been determined the boy will be tried as an adult, he encourages, even advises, the social worker on ways to help the boy. This sheriff sees the difference between law and justice, and while his job is to maintain the former, he has an enlightened understanding of the latter and has remorse for his inability to affect justice and shows great empathy and sympathy for those caught in between.
The social worker works to protect juveniles who are being charged as adults. She cares too much for the people she represents, and has given her life to her cause. One of her main benefactors is a drug smuggler. This presents an interesting moral dilemma, as he admits his main reason for helping is because he wants "...those kids back on the street, they're my customers 'bout five steps down the line," while sublimely giving us the feeling there is more to it than that -- maybe he secretly cares, maybe he subconsciously feels guilty, maybe he is in love with the woman, more likely a combination of all three - realistic. She happily accepts his money because she feels the ends justify the means. We also find out that she likes to recreationally use cocaine, but only when visiting him because it's free and she is too poor to afford it on her own.
The drug dealer is also a surprise, he is intellectual and actually seems like a nice guy, separate from the bad things he does and the even worse things he probably has to do in the course of his job.
Soon after this the movie takes a turn that I will not reveal, I will only say that these people make hard choices, as the title implies. They make both bad decisions and good decisions, in a more realistic way then I have seen in a long time, and the ending is anything but predictable.
First let me say, I think Tim Conway is one of the funniest people on the planet. His work on The Carol Burnett Show and his recent work in Vegas with Harvey Korman result in genuine side-splitting, tear inducing, belly laugh's. That talent, however, is wasted in this effort. There is a fine line between a lovable goof and an annoying idiot, unfortunately, this movie crosses the line towards the latter in the most extreme manner.
The character that Tim Conway portrays begs the question, "How are you still alive?!" This is truly one of the worst, idiotic and annoying characters I have seen in a movie perhaps ever! If you are a fan of Tim Conway's work, then please see him live with Harvey Korman or check out classic Carol Burnett skits, but do not see this movie -- it is almost bad enough to make one turn on him...
The character that Tim Conway portrays begs the question, "How are you still alive?!" This is truly one of the worst, idiotic and annoying characters I have seen in a movie perhaps ever! If you are a fan of Tim Conway's work, then please see him live with Harvey Korman or check out classic Carol Burnett skits, but do not see this movie -- it is almost bad enough to make one turn on him...
Have you ever been to a party where you dislike everybody? By that, I mean, you can not find one single person whose company you enjoy. This movie is that party!
There is not one single redeemable character in this movie, no one you can sympathize with or care about. No one worth spending your time, which means this movie is not worth spending your time.
The two main characters are two spoiled, rotten, selfish, moronic individuals without one good character trait I can see. The one character that you would expect to illicit sympathy, the deaf house maid, is also portrayed as selfish and idiotic. Each character's moves throughout the entire movie illicits the following question: "Why would anyone do that?!"
If you like this type of party, then enjoy, but if you're like me, throw the invitation away.
There is not one single redeemable character in this movie, no one you can sympathize with or care about. No one worth spending your time, which means this movie is not worth spending your time.
The two main characters are two spoiled, rotten, selfish, moronic individuals without one good character trait I can see. The one character that you would expect to illicit sympathy, the deaf house maid, is also portrayed as selfish and idiotic. Each character's moves throughout the entire movie illicits the following question: "Why would anyone do that?!"
If you like this type of party, then enjoy, but if you're like me, throw the invitation away.