The_Jew_Revue
feb 2002 se unió
Te damos la bienvenida a nuevo perfil
Nuestras actualizaciones aún están en desarrollo. Si bien la versión anterior de el perfil ya no está disponible, estamos trabajando activamente en mejoras, ¡y algunas de las funciones que faltan regresarán pronto! Mantente al tanto para su regreso. Mientras tanto, el análisis de calificaciones sigue disponible en nuestras aplicaciones para iOS y Android, en la página de perfil. Para ver la distribución de tus calificaciones por año y género, consulta nuestra nueva Guía de ayuda.
Distintivos37
Para saber cómo ganar distintivos, ve a página de ayuda de distintivos.
Calificaciones3.2 k
Clasificación de The_Jew_Revue
Reseñas950
Clasificación de The_Jew_Revue
"The Proof in the Pudding" stands out as a particularly compelling and tense entry in the series, skillfully blending the show's signature forensic science with a high-stakes, political thriller narrative. The premise of a mysterious, top-secret body being delivered to a locked-down Jeffersonian is immediately captivating, putting the entire team under immense pressure. The episode's strength lies in its ability to build suspense and intrigue, forcing the squints to race against the clock to uncover the truth about the deceased. The tension is palpable as the team works within an incredibly strict timeframe, and the presence of the men in black adds a layer of paranoia and mystery that is not typical for the series. It's an effective departure from the usual murder-of-the-week formula.
The episode masterfully toys with the audience's imagination by subtly hinting at a historical conspiracy, particularly around the identity of the body. The viewer, much like the characters, is led to believe they are examining the remains of a significant historical figure, with the episode cleverly planting clues that point to John F. Kennedy. This theory is reinforced by Hodgins' poignant question about why the body wouldn't be at Arlington, a line that immediately grounds the episode in a real-world conspiracy theory. While the conclusion of the episode is intentionally ambiguous and doesn't explicitly confirm the body's identity, this open-endedness is what makes the episode so memorable. It leaves the viewer to ponder the implications and the enduring relevance of the JFK assassination, demonstrating how historical events, even decades later, can still be a source of fascination and debate.
The episode masterfully toys with the audience's imagination by subtly hinting at a historical conspiracy, particularly around the identity of the body. The viewer, much like the characters, is led to believe they are examining the remains of a significant historical figure, with the episode cleverly planting clues that point to John F. Kennedy. This theory is reinforced by Hodgins' poignant question about why the body wouldn't be at Arlington, a line that immediately grounds the episode in a real-world conspiracy theory. While the conclusion of the episode is intentionally ambiguous and doesn't explicitly confirm the body's identity, this open-endedness is what makes the episode so memorable. It leaves the viewer to ponder the implications and the enduring relevance of the JFK assassination, demonstrating how historical events, even decades later, can still be a source of fascination and debate.
Happy Gilmore 2 is a hilarious and heartfelt film that truly serves as a love letter to fans of the original. This film manages to recapture the chaotic energy and crude humor that made the first movie a classic, while also bringing a fresh, modern feel. The guest appearances and surprise cameos are a highlight, and it's clear the filmmakers had a great time bringing back familiar faces and introducing new ones. A standout addition is Steve Buscemi, whose unique comedic style fits perfectly into the Happy Gilmore universe. His scenes are a welcome surprise and add another layer of laughter to an already packed film. The movie is a perfect blend of nostalgia and new humor, ensuring you'll be laughing from start to finish.
One of the film's most touching and memorable moments is the graveyard scene featuring Happy and his old nemesis, Shooter McGavin. This scene is a respectful and humorous homage to the actors from the original film who have since passed away, including a touching tribute to Bob Barker and even the feisty "Mista Mista lady". The film handles this moment with a perfect balance of reverence and comedy, a testament to the script's skillful writing. It's a scene that will likely bring a tear to your eye while simultaneously making you burst out laughing. Happy Gilmore 2 is a must-watch for anyone who grew up with the original, and it's a rare sequel that is better than all the hype.
One of the film's most touching and memorable moments is the graveyard scene featuring Happy and his old nemesis, Shooter McGavin. This scene is a respectful and humorous homage to the actors from the original film who have since passed away, including a touching tribute to Bob Barker and even the feisty "Mista Mista lady". The film handles this moment with a perfect balance of reverence and comedy, a testament to the script's skillful writing. It's a scene that will likely bring a tear to your eye while simultaneously making you burst out laughing. Happy Gilmore 2 is a must-watch for anyone who grew up with the original, and it's a rare sequel that is better than all the hype.
Louis Malle's 1978 film Pretty Baby is definitely one of those movies that, even decades later, sparks a lot of discussion and discomfort due to its incredibly controversial subject matter. The acting in it, however, is undeniably compelling, especially given the film's challenging content. Susan Sarandon delivers a strong performance, but it's Brooke Shields who truly carries the weight of the film. She was remarkably young, only around 11 or 12 years old at the time of filming, which makes her portrayal of a child prostitute in a New Orleans brothel particularly astounding and, for many, deeply unsettling.
The decision for Shields to "bare all" at such a young age remains the film's most shocking aspect, and it's almost unthinkable by today's standards. It's truly astounding that the director was so adamant about using a child actor for such explicit scenes, and equally perplexing that Shields's mother allowed her to participate in such a role. While the film is often lauded for its aesthetic and its unflinching look at a difficult subject, the ethical implications surrounding Shields's involvement at that age are impossible to ignore. It's a film that demands a conversation about art, exploitation, and the boundaries of cinematic realism.
The decision for Shields to "bare all" at such a young age remains the film's most shocking aspect, and it's almost unthinkable by today's standards. It's truly astounding that the director was so adamant about using a child actor for such explicit scenes, and equally perplexing that Shields's mother allowed her to participate in such a role. While the film is often lauded for its aesthetic and its unflinching look at a difficult subject, the ethical implications surrounding Shields's involvement at that age are impossible to ignore. It's a film that demands a conversation about art, exploitation, and the boundaries of cinematic realism.
Encuestas realizadas recientemente
292 en total de las encuestas realizadas