MLVC4E

28 Years Later arrives with the difficult task of continuing a story that helped define modern zombie cinema. Danny Boyle returns behind the camera and, while the result is visually and atmospherically strong, the connection to the first two films feels diluted. It's not that there's a lack of tension or new ideas, but the shift in tone is so marked that it's hard to feel it as a natural continuation.

The film blends bursts of high energy, frantic action sequences, and a more ambitious focus on political and social themes, touching on isolationism and cultural conflicts. This gives it personality, though it also makes the plot feel more scattered and less centered on the pure horror that defined its predecessors.

The cast delivers solid performances, with characters that-at least in part-manage to engage emotionally. However, the structure feels more like the opening of a new trilogy than a closure to the previous arc, leaving the sense that we're only watching a first act.

Visually, Boyle proves once again his skill in crafting striking images: impactful shots, clever use of light, and a relentless pace. But that same energy sometimes becomes a double-edged sword, reducing cohesion and breaking the atmosphere that worked so well in the first two films.

Ultimately, it's an ambitious return with memorable moments, but also an uneven one. It brings freshness and risk, though at the cost of some of the essence that made the saga great. The future of this new chapter will depend on whether the next installments can balance innovation with continuity.

Few things are as disappointing as revisiting a saga that once left a mark on you, only to find that nothing remains of what made it special. Rings tries to bring back the myth of Samara by adapting it to today's codes, but the result is a film that never truly finds its own identity. The fear that permeated The Ring here dissolves into predictable jump scares, forced twists, and characters who seem to move out of obligation rather than logic or instinct.

The script wavers between repeating worn-out formulas and adding "new" ideas that, far from enriching the story, make it confused and disjointed. There's no leading role with the dramatic weight Naomi Watts brought to the original, and the threat of the cursed tape loses its edge by being wrapped in a teen package that lacks real tension.

Visually, the film delivers without impressing: dark photography, a closed-in atmosphere... but everything feels too calculated, without the genuine discomfort a story like this needs. The suspense is weak, and the few scenes that aim to shock stand alone, without a build-up to support them.

Perhaps the most frustrating thing is that Rings fails to justify its existence. It adds nothing new to the universe it borrows from and, in its attempt to "modernize" the tale, forgets what made it a phenomenon: that creeping sense of imminent terror that stayed with you long after turning off the TV. Here, the only thing that lingers at the end is indifference.

Some films, beyond their story, capture you through the atmosphere they create from the very first frame. Robert Eggers' new version of Nosferatu is exactly that: a total immersion into a world of shadows, dampness, and superstitions, where fear is not shouted but breathed. There's no rush here; every shot is crafted with meticulous care, with cinematography that feels painted in candlelight and staging that forces you to notice every detail, even when you'd rather look away.

Eggers doesn't just pay tribute to Murnau's classic-he wraps it in an aesthetic that is both sickly and elegant, feeling as old as it is new. Bill Skarsgård embodies a disturbing, viscous, almost hypnotic Count Orlok, while Lily-Rose Depp brings a counterpoint of fragility and strength that elevates the narrative. This is not the typical Dracula story we've seen countless times; here, horror blends with a subtext of power, corruption, and desire that creeps in like a heavy fog.

The setting is flawless: villages steeped in superstition, endless corridors, and a foul atmosphere that recalls the most primitive terrors of cinema. The music and sound design play a crucial role, reinforcing that sense of constant threat. There are no cheap scares; fear grows gradually, as if the film were quietly closing the door behind you without you noticing.

Some may find it too respectful of the source material and not daring enough at times, but its strength doesn't lie in reinventing the story-it's in making it feel alive again. This is a journey that doesn't rely on the fast-paced rhythms of modern horror but on the patient construction of a mood that pins you to your seat.

In a landscape oversaturated with modern reinterpretations and prefab scares, this Nosferatu feels like an act of resistance: artisanal horror cinema, designed to be both admired and feared. By the time the final shot arrives, with its blend of beauty and repulsion, it's clear Eggers hasn't made a simple remake-he's woven a nightmare that, like the vampire himself, clings to your skin long after it's over.