[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendario de lanzamientosTop 250 películasPelículas más popularesBuscar películas por géneroTaquilla superiorHorarios y entradasNoticias sobre películasPelículas de la India destacadas
    Programas de televisión y streamingLas 250 mejores seriesSeries más popularesBuscar series por géneroNoticias de TV
    Qué verÚltimos trailersTítulos originales de IMDbSelecciones de IMDbDestacado de IMDbGuía de entretenimiento familiarPodcasts de IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalPremios STARmeterInformación sobre premiosInformación sobre festivalesTodos los eventos
    Nacidos un día como hoyCelebridades más popularesNoticias sobre celebridades
    Centro de ayudaZona de colaboradoresEncuestas
Para profesionales de la industria
  • Idioma
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista de visualización
Iniciar sesión
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usar app
Imagen de perfil de Miles-10

Miles-10

feb 2000 se unió
Te damos la bienvenida a nuevo perfil
Nuestras actualizaciones aún están en desarrollo. Si bien la versión anterior de el perfil ya no está disponible, estamos trabajando activamente en mejoras, ¡y algunas de las funciones que faltan regresarán pronto! Mantente al tanto para su regreso. Mientras tanto, el análisis de calificaciones sigue disponible en nuestras aplicaciones para iOS y Android, en la página de perfil. Para ver la distribución de tus calificaciones por año y género, consulta nuestra nueva Guía de ayuda.

Distintivos9

Para saber cómo ganar distintivos, ve a página de ayuda de distintivos.
Explora los distintivos

Calificaciones277

Clasificación de Miles-10
El rastro
7.17
El rastro
No Time for Sergeants
7.59
No Time for Sergeants
The Hidden Room
7.38
The Hidden Room
El misterio de la playa
7.28
El misterio de la playa
La casa de la calle 92
6.66
La casa de la calle 92
Enemigo de todos
7.610
Enemigo de todos
Too Many Tuna Sandwiches
9.09
Too Many Tuna Sandwiches
First Class
6.74
First Class
The Killer Down the Hall
7.66
The Killer Down the Hall
The First 100 Days
7.98
The First 100 Days
Brats
6.58
Brats
Ocultos por la luna
6.25
Ocultos por la luna
Nefarious: La palabra del Diablo
6.48
Nefarious: La palabra del Diablo
The Gray Lady
6.98
The Gray Lady
The Truth
4.87
The Truth
The Cuban Connection
4.85
The Cuban Connection
Oswald Goes Dark
4.76
Oswald Goes Dark
The Iron Meeting
4.36
The Iron Meeting
The Russian Network
4.56
The Russian Network
Episode 7
7.56
Episode 7
JFK Declassified: Tracking Oswald
4.68
JFK Declassified: Tracking Oswald
Misión Europa
6.47
Misión Europa
Cooperland
5.47
Cooperland
King's Man: El Origen
6.34
King's Man: El Origen
Con la vida en un hilo
7.06
Con la vida en un hilo

Wish list12

  • Gillian Anderson
    North American Actors Who Do British Accents
    • 27 personas
    • Público
    • Modificado el 16 abr 2025
  • Peter Ustinov
    Spies and the Children and Close Relatives of Spies
    • 17 personas
    • Público
    • Modificado el 12 sep 2024
  • Brandon Lee in El Cuervo (1994)
    Unsafe Use of Firearms On- and Off-set in Hollywood
    • 20 títulos
    • Público
    • Modificado el 16 ene 2023
  • Robert Easton
    Dialect Coaches
    • 2 personas
    • Público
    • Modificado el 05 jul 2021
Ve todas las listas

Reseñas242

Clasificación de Miles-10
El rastro

El rastro

7.1
7
  • 4 ago 2025
  • If it didn't really happen would it be believable?

    A hard-to-solve crime is sometimes solved when an alert cop accidentally stumbles on the perpetrator acting suspiciously, or a guilty conscience brings a witness or the perp himself to confess, or, nowadays, a new DNA analysis uncovers the identity of the criminal. In the real-life case that is the basis for this four part series, any of these things could have happened (and one seems to almost happen but turns out to be a red herring).

    Sixteen years is a long time to take to solve a double murder. (Though, of course, some murder cases have never been solved, which is a lot longer than this case took.) If this were fiction, the time it took to solve the case would be borderline boring, and the red herring that develops would have seemed like a cheat since it was set up as if it might mean a lot more than it did. The coincidence that ends up solving the case is almost too coincidental, except that this coincidence not only really happened, but also, you would think that in 16 years investigators might have discovered the coincidence sooner or run across other evidence that made finding the coincidence unnecessary. (The police note the last point themselves.)

    Others have found this series to be well paced. Well, if it went on for ten episodes, that would have been way too slow. As it is, though, I think that four hours is too long. Dramatic events in the case were years apart. We almost feel like we are living with the characters in real time. We see how all of the main characters--police and victims' families alike--are dragged down by the weight of the case. Still, the ending is hopeful. People can get second chances once the external reason for being depressed is lifted, but it is seen that they have to make an effort to benefit from this opportunity. Some good can come from tragedy. Even the coincidence that solves the case also leads to a surpising but logical outcome that connects two characters we were not expecting to get together; yet, when it happens, it makes perfect sense. (Lesson: If your story has a coincidence in it, make sure it pays off believably. In this case, reality did that.)
    La casa de la calle 92

    La casa de la calle 92

    6.6
    6
  • 5 jun 2025
  • A historical artifact dripping with unintended irony

    This is a puff piece, created by FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover in partnership with Twentieth Century Fox. He not only gave the filmmakers access to promotional material about FBI methods but instructed his agents to participate as extras.

    The story is about no-nonsense FBI Special Agent George Briggs (Lloyd Nolan), who oversees counter intelligence in New York City. When the existence of a German spy ring comes to his attention, he happens to have an ace in the hole in the person of German-American double agent William Dietrich (William Eythe) who infiltrates the "Christopher" ring. The only true mystery is the identity of Christopher, which is withheld until the climax. Before that, we only see Christopher at a distance and from the waist down or, sometimes obliquely, with his hat covering much of his face. In the stead of Christopher, the ring seems to be led by coldly elegant Elsa Gebhardt (Signe Hasso), suave Colonel Hammersohn (Leo G. Carroll), and ruthless Johanna Schmidt (Lydia St. Claire). All three of these villains are memorable, although Hasso is the movie's secret weapon, and not only because her coif and skirt suit are fashionably timeless.

    The spy ring is trying to steal secrets to the atomic bomb. It is suggested that this story could only be told after the bomb was dropped on Hiroshima in August 1945, but it might be more accurate to say that this movie's fictional plot could only have been concocted after Hiroshima. There were undoubtedly German spies in New York trying to steal all manner of information, but they were never assigned a mission like the one portrayed here. The German nuclear program would have benefited from intelligence about the Manhattan Project (never named as such in this movie), but their program lagged the Allied program due to under-funding and lack of other resources, thanks to Hitler's dismissal of nuclear physics as "Jewish science." Although at the end of this 1945 movie, the narrator assures us that nuclear secrets remain secure, we later learned that they had, in fact, already been stolen from the U. S. and Great Britain not by Nazis but by Soviet spies.

    During World War II, the Federal Bureau of Investigation was largely responsible for counter-intelligence, detecting and arresting foreign spies and saboteurs. It even conducted foreign intelligence gathering, especially in Latin America. There was a rivalry between Hoover and William Donovan, head of the Office of Strategic Services, which was supposed to be solely in charge of foreign intelligence operations.

    The narrator tells us that 16,440 spies, saboteurs, and "dangerous" foreign nationals were detained, and some were interned. Six were executed. The big number is unverifiable. More like 11,000 Germans in the U. S. were rounded up. Another 8,000 Germans with Latin American citizenship or residency were arrested, too, but adding this number would overshoot the film's figure. Fewer than two thousand Italian nationals were interned, although many more faced restrictions. (BTW these round ups were hardly surgical: Anyone who still had German or Italian citizenship-even if they had, say, escaped Germany because they were Jewish-was vulnerable to being scooped up by the Bureau and interned, at least briefly.) If we add the number of Japanese-Americans who were sent to camps in the U. S., then more than one hundred thousand people would be added to the narrator's figure. (To his credit, Hoover protested the internment of Japanese-Americans, but he followed orders and rounded them up, anyway.) The six men mentioned by the narrator as having been executed recalls a real FBI case. A German saboteur named George Dasch tried repeatedly to turn himself in to the FBI, but the Bureau didn't believe him and turned him away. Finally, Dasch showed the FBI $84,000 he had been given to fund the German operation. This led to the capture and execution of six of Dasch's colleagues. Thus, the movie's revelation that the "Christopher Case" came to light by accident lends more verisimilitude than would be flattering to the FBI.

    A real-life counterpart of the understated Special Agent Briggs may have been William King Harvey, although he was flamboyant rather than understated. Harvey, who seems to have, indeed, uncovered Nazi spies during the war, later joined the Central Intelligence Agency and became involved in high-tech spying on the Soviets in Berlin and, still later, with attempts to assassinate Fidel Castro, although he had actually been transferred out of that job before some of the more harebrained schemes to kill Castro were hatched.
    Enemigo de todos

    Enemigo de todos

    7.6
    10
  • 8 may 2025
  • A Great Character-Driven Western Crime Drama

    Texas Rangers (Jeff Bridges, Gil Birmingham) chase serial bank robbers (Chris Pine, Ben Foster) across the West Texas landscape. But though they ride cars and trucks instead of horses, make no mistake. This is as much of a Western as another Jeff Bridges film, "True Grit," though that was set in the 19th century and this is set in the 21st.

    While the plot is punctuated with action, the personalities of the lead characters played by Bridges and Pine make us care about and root for each alternatively. And the interplay of each with his ally raises further feelings of concern. Bridges character, Marcus, keeps making racist remarks to his partner, Alberto, as if these should be taken as gentle ribbing, but Alberto is obviously (to us) barely surpressing resentment.

    On the other side, Toby (Pine) is aware that his brother, Tanner (Foster), is a loose cannon who has to be treated with care, although Toby knows what we only learn as the story develops, which is that Tanner loves his brother and will never hurt him--even if no one else is safe from his violent impulses.

    The relentlessness or these representatives of law and disorder as well as their cat-and-mouse logic as each plans his next move, threaten to lead to tragedy; yet the expectation of a showdown between good and evil, while partially fulfilled, is mixed with something more subtle and thoughtful.
    Ver todas las reseñas

    Encuestas realizadas recientemente

    2 en total de las encuestas realizadas
    Favorite James McCaffrey TV Series
    Se realizó 7 jul 2024
    Civil Wars (1991)
    What did you want to be when you grew up?
    Se realizó 26 abr 2016
    Louise Fletcher in Atrapado sin salida (1975)

    Visto recientemente

    Habilita las cookies del navegador para usar esta función. Más información.
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    Inicia sesión para obtener más accesoInicia sesión para obtener más acceso
    Sigue a IMDb en las redes sociales
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    Para Android e iOS
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    • Ayuda
    • Índice del sitio
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licencia de datos de IMDb
    • Sala de prensa
    • Publicidad
    • Trabaja con nosotros
    • Condiciones de uso
    • Política de privacidad
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, una compañía de Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.