speculatrix
ene 2001 se unió
Distintivos2
Para saber cómo ganar distintivos, ve a página de ayuda de distintivos.
Reseñas14
Clasificación de speculatrix
Unfortunately the plot holes and poor directions spoil what would would have been an ok series. The characters are engaging and distinct, but do obviously stupid things that shouldn't ever happen. If this was aimed at a barely teen audience they'd probably get away with it.
These problems are obvious while you're watching it, not even when you think about it later.
These problems are obvious while you're watching it, not even when you think about it later.
I enjoyed the movie, it was fine. Not bad, not great, fine. It felt fairly predictable, and the plot was a little unimaginative: a minor arc of redemption and a mcguffin.
The characters were fair, the acting fair, but it was carried by excellent seamless CGI, with nicely engineered surround sound which felt immersive. Overall a high quality production.
I'm sure that if you don't have a large high quality TV and halfway decent sound system it may not draw you in and you'll feel flat.
It's a shame that it only warrants six stars because for the budget and the production quality should have been better. Unfortunately this is a common complaint about many movies.
The characters were fair, the acting fair, but it was carried by excellent seamless CGI, with nicely engineered surround sound which felt immersive. Overall a high quality production.
I'm sure that if you don't have a large high quality TV and halfway decent sound system it may not draw you in and you'll feel flat.
It's a shame that it only warrants six stars because for the budget and the production quality should have been better. Unfortunately this is a common complaint about many movies.
There's no objective science here, it's just a waste of time, and chances are if you follow the money they'll try and grift. This is much like flat-earth stuff. It's surprising that this so-called theory has survived since 1959.
Do yourself a favour and study high school science and take a course on critical thinking rather than watch this nonsense.
But don't take my word for it, search the the internet for "critique of the electric Universe Theory" and find many great demolitions of this.
"At worst it's sheer crackpottery like homeopathy and astrology, making claims clearly contradicted by the evidence."
And it fails as a theory, fails even junior high science teaching: it's not testable, and cannot be used to predict or explain things in depth.
Do yourself a favour and study high school science and take a course on critical thinking rather than watch this nonsense.
But don't take my word for it, search the the internet for "critique of the electric Universe Theory" and find many great demolitions of this.
"At worst it's sheer crackpottery like homeopathy and astrology, making claims clearly contradicted by the evidence."
And it fails as a theory, fails even junior high science teaching: it's not testable, and cannot be used to predict or explain things in depth.
Encuestas realizadas recientemente
2 en total de las encuestas realizadas