alanpuzey
sep 2000 se unió
Te damos la bienvenida a nuevo perfil
Nuestras actualizaciones aún están en desarrollo. Si bien la versión anterior de el perfil ya no está disponible, estamos trabajando activamente en mejoras, ¡y algunas de las funciones que faltan regresarán pronto! Mantente al tanto para su regreso. Mientras tanto, el análisis de calificaciones sigue disponible en nuestras aplicaciones para iOS y Android, en la página de perfil. Para ver la distribución de tus calificaciones por año y género, consulta nuestra nueva Guía de ayuda.
Distintivos3
Para saber cómo ganar distintivos, ve a página de ayuda de distintivos.
Calificaciones1.3 k
Clasificación de alanpuzey
Reseñas121
Clasificación de alanpuzey
A pretty good, informative series, but I thought there was something not quite right a lot of the time. Was it the strange studio a lot of it was shot in, with unfinished brick walls - that were not a good thing to project videos upon, or maybe the camera dwelling on Dr Helen Czerski or her reflection for too long a time!
It could have been so much better, but let down by the editing, rather monotonous sequencing of shots and the overall production.
I thought the episodes on Aurora (#4) and Tornadoes (#5) were 10/10 but the other episodes mostly 7/10, so I rated the whole series at 8/10.
The subjects are well worth updating as advancements are made.
It could have been so much better, but let down by the editing, rather monotonous sequencing of shots and the overall production.
I thought the episodes on Aurora (#4) and Tornadoes (#5) were 10/10 but the other episodes mostly 7/10, so I rated the whole series at 8/10.
The subjects are well worth updating as advancements are made.
This sort of programme dates very quickly and having just watched it, over five years since it was made, this was very apparent.
There was a lot of repetition and the the production was often slow and laboured. So much so that at times I Increased the playback speed to 1.3x which was perfectly acceptable to me and didn't affect my concentration.
The content was pertinent at the time, but certainly in need of an update now.
I will repeat that to meet IMDb's number of characters, a really peculiar demand.
This sort of programme dates very quickly and having just watched it over five years since it was made, this was very apparent.
There was a lot of repetition and the the production was often slow and laboured. So much so that at times I Increased the playback speed to 1.3x which was perfectly acceptable to me and didn't affect my concentration.
The content was pertinent at the time, but certainly in need of an update now.
There was a lot of repetition and the the production was often slow and laboured. So much so that at times I Increased the playback speed to 1.3x which was perfectly acceptable to me and didn't affect my concentration.
The content was pertinent at the time, but certainly in need of an update now.
I will repeat that to meet IMDb's number of characters, a really peculiar demand.
This sort of programme dates very quickly and having just watched it over five years since it was made, this was very apparent.
There was a lot of repetition and the the production was often slow and laboured. So much so that at times I Increased the playback speed to 1.3x which was perfectly acceptable to me and didn't affect my concentration.
The content was pertinent at the time, but certainly in need of an update now.
'Smiling Jockey' was in my list of films to watch, I knew nothing about it other than a couple of remarks that made it sound interesting. I sat down with a drink and put it on. I liked the low angle dusk/dawn shots that occured throughout the movie, but the soundtrack wasn't perfect and I would haved subtitles. I looked for them after watching the movie for 10 minutes but found none. I continued watching, and at many points wondered am i watching actual people talking about actual events, or are these actors, acting out a story or true-life event. I'm still not sure.
The camerawork continued to be good, but most of the visual was head to head talking, and by the halfway mark I thought I had made a mistake with this movie. I continued by fast forwarding the film, and watching a few scenes until the end where I watched the final 10 minutes at normal speed. A little action - which was welcome in a film about horse racing - but it failed to make the movie much more interesting and so I put this one to bed with a low rating. Sorry! Would have been a '1' but the camerawork make it a '2.'
The camerawork continued to be good, but most of the visual was head to head talking, and by the halfway mark I thought I had made a mistake with this movie. I continued by fast forwarding the film, and watching a few scenes until the end where I watched the final 10 minutes at normal speed. A little action - which was welcome in a film about horse racing - but it failed to make the movie much more interesting and so I put this one to bed with a low rating. Sorry! Would have been a '1' but the camerawork make it a '2.'
Encuestas realizadas recientemente
7 en total de las encuestas realizadas