Ole' Max

Herzblatt is such a beautiful young girl but she doesn't know she might cause trouble sunbathing in the nude on a terrace high up on a house. She even causes a crew of construction workers to fall off a neighbouring house because they're so keen to see her. Her father tries to convince her that it would be better to wear something because she is a woman now with all the attributes of a very beautiful woman. The movie very much covers the naughty attitude of young people of the late 1960s, the first generation in Germany who was born after WW2 and therefore never experienced the hardships of the war and the years that followed. This comedy is an example of German entertainment that intends just solely to entertain and not to educate people or to give them advice. It's simply fun to watch this silly little movie which can't at all be compared with contemporary erotic movies, especially not with American movies of the kind.

I would say that 7th Heaven tries to promote too much "political correctness". In fact I think 7H is more conservative than The Waltons which were aired a long time ago. And the thing that I like least about 7H is that different views on contraception or when to have sex for the first time or how far parents should sneak into the private life of their kids are usually depicted as absolutely wrong. However, there are different philosophies on all these topics and none of them can be out-ruled. Hah, I was most bewildered by Eric's remarks early into the current seasons that he thinks abstinence is the most important thing in the world. Just imagine these words are coming from a man who fathered 7 children (at least). Well, we haven't, so far, been informed about Eric's life before he met Annie. So how could we rule out that he's got another skeleton in the locker just like Charles Jackson did...

First of all I would like to say that JP III is mainly a potpourri of a lot of dinosaurs showing up at random and having been chosen for their brutality. That's not up to the standard of the other 2 "Jurassic Park" movies. And second, I have to point out that the JP III movie has absolutely nothing to do with Crichton's third JP novel. I believe the movie would have been a lot better if the movie makers had used Mr. Crichton's story plot. The novel is great, the movie isn't. I don't understand why experienced movie makers sometimes make such bad mistakes. It was, however, somewhat interesting that new species of dinos were introduced. However, only brutal dinos were used. And for example, why would the Pterodaktyls (the flying dinos) attack people? Weren't they bound for much smaller prey?