gagewyn
ene 2000 se unió
Te damos la bienvenida a nuevo perfil
Nuestras actualizaciones aún están en desarrollo. Si bien la versión anterior de el perfil ya no está disponible, estamos trabajando activamente en mejoras, ¡y algunas de las funciones que faltan regresarán pronto! Mantente al tanto para su regreso. Mientras tanto, el análisis de calificaciones sigue disponible en nuestras aplicaciones para iOS y Android, en la página de perfil. Para ver la distribución de tus calificaciones por año y género, consulta nuestra nueva Guía de ayuda.
Distintivos4
Para saber cómo ganar distintivos, ve a página de ayuda de distintivos.
Reseñas40
Clasificación de gagewyn
Shadow of the Vampire is a fictional account of the behind the scenes
events surrounding the making of the silent film Nosferatu. There are
some interesting parallels in the plots of the two movies, mainly
because Shadow of the Vampire treats Nosferatu as if it were filmed
sequentially. The intermittent scenes from Nosferatu in the frame of
Murnau's camera play off the action going on just outside the frame.
Any five minute clip of this film would be interesting and well done.
Still the film as a whole falls short. I think that some of this may be
due to the mixture the film was going for. There is the horror comedy
mix, which is pretty well done, there is the historical background,
which starts to loose coherence, and then there are little bits like the
vampire talking about why he didn't like the novel Dracula (it didn't
mirror his own life, so he found it horribly inaccurate) which try to
introduce a bit of philosophy. So you get these bits where the vampire
is being deep, and then he hisses at someone for comic relief. This is
OK in little parts, but overall it was instances like these which lost
the film it's footing. In the end it gave me the impression of a very
muddled effect.
Still, any short segment of the film that I can think of was pretty
good, including the opening credits with a lot of moody zooms on celtic
style drawings. These credits were so long that the end credits started
with the main actor's stand-ins or something. Anyway we're talking
really long opening credits, so the fact that they were decent to watch
says a lot. Anyhow the details are good. I particularly liked the
scenes with Murnau yelling at the actors or telling them something odd
to get the proper reaction because the only other places I get to see
silent film type directing like this is on MTV's Making the Video. (only
prerecorded sound in a music video) The bits with the vampire are also
great with lots of very overdone very funny hissing going on.
It's a toss up as to whether or not this film is worth seeing, mainly
because it doesn't hold together well. If you are a fan of the horror
genre or it sounds interesting to you then you might like it for the
parts. Seeing Nosferatu first would be a good idea, since this movie
plays off it quite a bit, (there is also the possibility of it giving
away the plot to Nosferatu) and since Nosferatu is pretty good.
events surrounding the making of the silent film Nosferatu. There are
some interesting parallels in the plots of the two movies, mainly
because Shadow of the Vampire treats Nosferatu as if it were filmed
sequentially. The intermittent scenes from Nosferatu in the frame of
Murnau's camera play off the action going on just outside the frame.
Any five minute clip of this film would be interesting and well done.
Still the film as a whole falls short. I think that some of this may be
due to the mixture the film was going for. There is the horror comedy
mix, which is pretty well done, there is the historical background,
which starts to loose coherence, and then there are little bits like the
vampire talking about why he didn't like the novel Dracula (it didn't
mirror his own life, so he found it horribly inaccurate) which try to
introduce a bit of philosophy. So you get these bits where the vampire
is being deep, and then he hisses at someone for comic relief. This is
OK in little parts, but overall it was instances like these which lost
the film it's footing. In the end it gave me the impression of a very
muddled effect.
Still, any short segment of the film that I can think of was pretty
good, including the opening credits with a lot of moody zooms on celtic
style drawings. These credits were so long that the end credits started
with the main actor's stand-ins or something. Anyway we're talking
really long opening credits, so the fact that they were decent to watch
says a lot. Anyhow the details are good. I particularly liked the
scenes with Murnau yelling at the actors or telling them something odd
to get the proper reaction because the only other places I get to see
silent film type directing like this is on MTV's Making the Video. (only
prerecorded sound in a music video) The bits with the vampire are also
great with lots of very overdone very funny hissing going on.
It's a toss up as to whether or not this film is worth seeing, mainly
because it doesn't hold together well. If you are a fan of the horror
genre or it sounds interesting to you then you might like it for the
parts. Seeing Nosferatu first would be a good idea, since this movie
plays off it quite a bit, (there is also the possibility of it giving
away the plot to Nosferatu) and since Nosferatu is pretty good.
Money Bone was a decent watch, but I think that at some levels it
tried too hard to be zany and original and just came out cluttered. The
plot deals with the cartoonist Stu Miley and his alter ego creation
Monkey Bone, and takes place in the real world, and in the worlds of
sleep and death. By the way Sleep is the brother of Death. I
particularly liked the theme of voyage into and return from the land of
death, because this sets up sort of a classical framework, and gave the
movie a good level of restraint and balance.
As for the visual effects, which I feel have been the main
marketing appeal of the film so far, they are consistently done, which
flaws the film. The effects in the land of sleep are extremely well
done. What might otherwise be a meaningless clutter of eye candy works
here because it adds to the sense of unreality and disorientation. In
the world of sleep the well done eye candy enhances the film on more
than a purely visual level. The problem is that the eye candy, and
constant activity are carried over to scenes in the real world. This
decreases some of the effect of having different worlds in the first
place. If people in the real world don't obey all the laws of physics,
dress in matching colors, or act rationally then what exactly is
disorienting about the sleep world in the first place?
In summary the dream and death world sequences were very well and
appropriately done, and had the whole movie been as well done I would
definitely recommend it. However carrying the visual clutter, that's
clutter - not richness, into the real normal world degenerated the movie
into more of a decorative eye candy type work. I do recommend watching
this film for the good parts, but it doesn't carry through, so don't get
your hopes up.
tried too hard to be zany and original and just came out cluttered. The
plot deals with the cartoonist Stu Miley and his alter ego creation
Monkey Bone, and takes place in the real world, and in the worlds of
sleep and death. By the way Sleep is the brother of Death. I
particularly liked the theme of voyage into and return from the land of
death, because this sets up sort of a classical framework, and gave the
movie a good level of restraint and balance.
As for the visual effects, which I feel have been the main
marketing appeal of the film so far, they are consistently done, which
flaws the film. The effects in the land of sleep are extremely well
done. What might otherwise be a meaningless clutter of eye candy works
here because it adds to the sense of unreality and disorientation. In
the world of sleep the well done eye candy enhances the film on more
than a purely visual level. The problem is that the eye candy, and
constant activity are carried over to scenes in the real world. This
decreases some of the effect of having different worlds in the first
place. If people in the real world don't obey all the laws of physics,
dress in matching colors, or act rationally then what exactly is
disorienting about the sleep world in the first place?
In summary the dream and death world sequences were very well and
appropriately done, and had the whole movie been as well done I would
definitely recommend it. However carrying the visual clutter, that's
clutter - not richness, into the real normal world degenerated the movie
into more of a decorative eye candy type work. I do recommend watching
this film for the good parts, but it doesn't carry through, so don't get
your hopes up.
Horror and comedy make a great mix, and this film mixes them pretty
well, although some of the transition between the two was a bit choppy.
The film grabbed my attention from the start, with the bit where the
split dog comes back to life. Seeing half a dog trying to run and
whimpering is something that you have to see. Also as scenes progress
and the nervous warehouse supervisor realizes things are bad, the sweat
pools under his arms and on his back get progressively bigger and
bigger. I guess between takes they were hitting the actor with a wet
sponge. Little jokes like these made the first part of the film one of
the funniest sequences I have seen.
The element of comedy is carried through the film, but in the second
half toned down and mixed with a much more horrific tone. I felt let
down by something about the shift, like the movie changed pace and left
me behind for about twenty minutes. I think that some of this may have
been to make fun of the death obsessed punks getting a taste of what
they were interested in. Remember Trash's talk about death - pretty
ironic considering what happens to her later. The fast paced comedic
element held through the film though, as each time some even more
horrible mistake was made wild music played.
The title might suggest that this film is a parody of Night of the
Living Dead. I have seen it represented as such, and I feel that it
isn't a parody, but there way be some intentional connection. Perhaps
the shift to serious violence and horror was part of working toward a
connection. Both films follow a progression of increasing seriousness,
with a slight relief then downer ending. Intentional connection may
have been part of what contributed to the choppy shift from comedy to
horror. On the other hand Return of the Living Dead felt complete at
the end, so overall the pacing was good.
I definitely recommend this movie to everyone. The whole thing was very
well done. This film plays up the kitsch value for parody effect, and
unlike many comedies doesn't feel weak at the end.
well, although some of the transition between the two was a bit choppy.
The film grabbed my attention from the start, with the bit where the
split dog comes back to life. Seeing half a dog trying to run and
whimpering is something that you have to see. Also as scenes progress
and the nervous warehouse supervisor realizes things are bad, the sweat
pools under his arms and on his back get progressively bigger and
bigger. I guess between takes they were hitting the actor with a wet
sponge. Little jokes like these made the first part of the film one of
the funniest sequences I have seen.
The element of comedy is carried through the film, but in the second
half toned down and mixed with a much more horrific tone. I felt let
down by something about the shift, like the movie changed pace and left
me behind for about twenty minutes. I think that some of this may have
been to make fun of the death obsessed punks getting a taste of what
they were interested in. Remember Trash's talk about death - pretty
ironic considering what happens to her later. The fast paced comedic
element held through the film though, as each time some even more
horrible mistake was made wild music played.
The title might suggest that this film is a parody of Night of the
Living Dead. I have seen it represented as such, and I feel that it
isn't a parody, but there way be some intentional connection. Perhaps
the shift to serious violence and horror was part of working toward a
connection. Both films follow a progression of increasing seriousness,
with a slight relief then downer ending. Intentional connection may
have been part of what contributed to the choppy shift from comedy to
horror. On the other hand Return of the Living Dead felt complete at
the end, so overall the pacing was good.
I definitely recommend this movie to everyone. The whole thing was very
well done. This film plays up the kitsch value for parody effect, and
unlike many comedies doesn't feel weak at the end.