Opiniones de usuarios

Today's episode was the last straw!! I agree that Judges Acker & Dimango have their moments but Judge Corriero totally disregards the facts in the case and makes up new ones. A young Lyft driver sued a woman for literally pulling out of a spot right into his car. She claimed to be parallel parking but clearly she was pulling out. Of course, no insurance!!! Since the plaintiff stated he didn't see her, Judge C took that to mean she was parking rather then the more logical she was pulling out. I don't know about you but I assume parked cars are staying that way. He is such a bleeding heart that it makes it impossible to enjoy the program. Time to hang up the robe!!!

My take on the objectivity of judges (I know it's only TeeVee judging):

Judge Dimango seems to be the most objective / least biased, although she has her moments.

Judge Acker makes an effort to be objective, and sometimes she surprises me with insight, but may be a bit more biased in some areas than Dimango.

Judge Corriero is more interested in showing that he is a really swell guy and a self-appointed moral giant than in following any laws / making an unbiased decision / being fair to people. His statements are full of "virtue-signaling". A man versus a woman will only be able to get any traction if his evidence and behavior and legal basis are absolutely impeccable. Corriero will try to find any weakness in the man and then lecture him.

I enjoy watching Hot Bench, but I do find it sometimes irritating. I thought Judges are not suppose to make judgment calls or assumptions while deciding the outcome of the court cases. Judge Acker, and Judge DiMango are very loud and opinionated. They constantly comment on what they believe really happened with no real evidence indicating what they're saying. Both, mainly Judge DiMango, is constantly very loud and raises her voice when she speaks to the defendants and plaintiffs. It's like she's scolding them. She also takes over in the deliberation room and talks over Judge Corriero most times. Judge Corriero has a lot to offer but both Judge DiMango and Judge Acker don't give him the opportunity to speak. Both Judge DiMango and Judge Acker converse looking at one another and leave Judge Corriero out of the discussion, like they don't care what he thinks because they only care what they think. Judge DiMango acts like it's her show and not a collaborative effort between all three Judges. I realize it's a show and they need to spice it up for the audience, but please don't call people liars and say what you think really happened, as you weren't there and that is not what judges should be doing. Sometimes I Associate Judge DiMango And Judge Acker like aggressive bullies.

Some of you think Judge Corriero is meek, mild, with some more aggressive moments. I think he doesn't know what to do. He seems to frequently get cut off and left out most times by the other two Judges. There has to be someone out of the three that show concern and compassion. One things for sure, Judge DiMango and Judge Acker are not ones to show any concern or compassion. They definitely think they are the show. Sometimes I think they are both fighting for Judge Judy's position for when she retires. Wouldn't it be funny if Judge Corriero is given the honours! LOL

You ever notice how Judge Demango never believe anyone and is ready to dismiss each case. Too lazy to listen and learn more.

This trio has got to go. I have never seen such a miscarriage of justice as I did yesterday. This concerns the psychopath that killed his neighbor's dog. His story of lies had so many holes in it, a three year old could have seen this man for the killer that he is. And his body language also was a definite indicated of how sick this man truly is. What were the judges' problem? How could they have been so wrong? I have watched this show since day one, but no more. This episode will be the last one I ever watch. It was so egregious, I hope it is the downfall of the show and the judges.

I love this show, I don't understand what the other reviewer was talking about I really miss Judge Backman. I hope he comes back. The new judge is nice but I really like the dynamics between the other 3 I hope he didn't quit because of his jealous ex who keep writing nasty reviews Please bring back Judge Backman for a guest judge the new judge is nice he's growing on me Love the other two. Being an Italian I totally relate to Patricia Judge Acker reminds me of my daughter (My daughter is also and attorney). Love the shop

This is a court? the judges are from SNL right? Three of the most hysterical people you'll ever want to meet. You can't take this seriously. An African American woman and a blonde against one single male make decisions. What they say is a joke. Can't believe Judge Judy is behind this. Always thought Judy was smart and knew better. But these three bimbos should have their own comedy show. Wait, they do. And it's called Hot Bench. Ha ha. Are three judges on a case legal? I know in the military courts it is but never heard of a three-man (excuse me one man,two women) before. However, it's an amusing way to waste an hour in the morning. And what's with the blonde judge's accent? Brooklyn? Queens? Sort of a female Archie Bunker. The lone male judge seems a bigoted idiot and sounds stupid in his arguments. When the three get together after not too much interrogation is where the comedy begins in their reasoning with each other. Right out of a Marx Brothers movie. Only the Marx Brothers were talented. Do these three have degrees? Hard to believe. Upon seeing the Three Stooges Judge program a second time, I still cannot believe they are still on the air. Judge Judy, please get them off for the sanity of all of us. And what's with a judge looking like some grade B Hollywood blonde wannabe. She is ugly and badly needs to get her GD hair out of her face. This is a court of law not some runway model show, although honey, you ain't no model. The African American lady only one with any class. Too bad she is outshone by the bimbo and male idiot. The male judge likes center stage and talks like some reject from Queens. The male and bimbo are the worst ever to look at and hear. Judy get rid them for all of us. Let the news continue without this comedy of judges.

My husband and I actually like this program more than Judge Judy. Part of the reason is because it's interesting to have the different judges ask their respective questions of the plaintiffs and defendants, plus it's fun to listen to them deliberate behind closed doors. They're fun personalities, too, although sometimes they get serious and scold the people who are before them. What's really fascinating is that some people go in, only asking for small amounts of money. What's up with that? Are they only interested in being on TV? Whatever.. it's really interesting to see what kinds of situations people can get themselves into.

Regardless of the case facts, Judge Corriere favors the women over men, and if the plaintiff and defendant are both women, then if it's a black woman over white, the white woman will lose. Try my theory and see. Then Judge Acker is all about race, and usually favors the black However, she is very good about getting to the basics about the case. Acker&Demango both are good at what they do. Judge Demango, I view as the centrist in this trio and has her head on straight. She follows case law regardless of gender or race. Which is the way a judge should handle their cases. She represents the show very well. Hats off to her.

I am shocked by the other reviews. I like Hot Bench the best of all the "judge" shows. It is more informative than any of the others. You don't just have a court case and a verdict. It is more in-depth. You get to hear what the judges are thinking in terms of what evidence was lacking, how the litigants should have proceeded, and how important selecting the most appropriate wording for your court papers are.

For example, in one episode, the judges discussed how unfortunate it was that the plaintiff did not sue the defendant under a different category, because they then would have been able to award damages to the plaintiff. You learn a great deal from the deliberation portion of the show. You get to understand what compels the judges to rule they way they did on each case. This is what sets it apart from all other similar shows.

I love the show. I would hate to see it canceled.

I absolutely loved Hot Bench! Have watched Hot Bench for many years. Have even recorded it and watched it later and sometimes over and over for years.....but, the new judges don't work. Help!! The old judges had chemistry and were fun to watch. Just Not so as of 10/31/22. The Prior judges work well together and had differing viewpoints that when they collaborated came confidently and professionally out but were all equal. I'm afraid you will lose viewership moving forward without the positive fun energy. You will lose mine. I will move to another court show, there are plenty on, lots of options.

Pleas bring the terrific Trio back!

The male judge - Michael Corriero - bends over backwards to try to view women as innocent victims. He is also full of lectures to men along the lines of "Men pay for the little lady, do you understand young man?" He fancies himself a "real man" and intends to show other men how to be real men (with his high-pitched voice that goes even higher during his rants). He's disgustingly transparent.

I have watched two episodes and both she made extremely offensive comments towards the "litigants".

1: At the end of the case she told a male to take his girlfriend to dinner because "shes skinny". Ummm whaaa?!?

2: Told a African American couple who repeatedly admitted and were open about their financial struggles to "pay their rent on time because it makes it easier for people like us". Umm..who is us? A rich white lady on TV?!?

Terrible!

It realY BOTHERS Judge Corriero wnthen an achild is suing aparent. He believes that it is wron to sue a parent or grandparent . He should leave the show because he doesnt think parents can be at fault. His concern is old fashioned Italian family structure.

Judge Corriero needs to retire, he gets angry and annoyed real quick. He's a bleeding heart when he sees tears, I have noticed that his eyes appear to be closed sometimes when they are deliberating the cases. He occasionally show annoyance when the other 2 judges don't agree with his decision. I think he is biased in some of the cases that are presented to them, that the other judges have to rectify. He did fairly well with Judges Acker and DiMaggio but would sometimes show annoyance with them also. He uses words to that are way over the heads of the litigants. This is court tv, not Supreme Court,

First of all, no, I have never been on this show. I love the idea of 3 judges and being able to see their discussion. The problem that I have with this show is Judge Corriero.....he will ALWAYS side with the female, ESPECIALLY if it is a single mom, he sides with anyone who brings in a child, he is so touchy, feely, sing Koombyya that it just turns me off. He needs to get a little tougher...the only time I saw him raise his voice was at a man who he felt took advantage of a female....without letting the guy give his side of the story. He needs to go...on the opposite end, the two female judges have more moxy than Corriero...they see right through the liars where Corriero does not.

I love this show and I feel that most times the judges have it right. sometimes they are not too nice but neither is judge Judy. They are not their to be the defendant;s friend and in most cases i agree with their verdict. Most of the defendants are guilty and you can tell almost right away that they are lying and trying to get money that they are not entitled to.

I used to love this show, but, now I consider it one of the worst on TV!!

Judge Corriero, for some reason, has it out for "men" and always has disrespectful comments toward them and "ALWAYS" take the female's side in a given case, EVEN if he is wrong.......

The black female judge, Judge Acker, is just totally lost and does not have a clue about the merit and evidence of cases.

Judge Dimango USED to tell it like it is and I loved her putting the litigants in their place when needed - (like Judge Judy).

Now, all three are so politically correct and afraid to say what needs to be said and to hell with evidence...

I watched the show yesterday and a man sued a woman, who was using him for money for years, and he had a text message with her acknowledging the debt........YET, all three IDIOT judges, ruled against him stating the she felt she "HAD" to say she owed him because the asked her for th4e money too many times!!!.... ARE YOU SERIOUS!......... WHEN YOU WRITE A TEXT MESSAGE SAYING YOU OWE MONEY, THAT IS AN ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF THE DEBT!!.........Yet, all three bumbling fools ruled against HIM???

I hate this show and will never watch it again.........IT NEEDS TO BE CANCELLED!

It appears that most of the reviews on here must be from losers on the show, sore losers, I might add. Our experience on the show, upcoming, not yet aired, was that the judges did a good job, asked viable questions and ruled in a common sense and fair manner. They took the information given, paid attention to the way questions were answered and did what any judges should do, rule fairly. I was concerned after reading these reviews that we had made the wrong decision about going on the show, I wondered if it would be a fair and realistic court decision. After 5 minutes in the courtroom I knew that the judges were taking this case seriously and would rule in a just manner. I was glad then that we made the decision to go on Hot Bench.

Wow. The three judges are unprofessional and mostly base their ruling on emotion and not on evidence. Are very arrogant and pretentious m The two females are very annoying and are like two chickens arguing all the time. The male is and idiot.

These Judges, along with their show's creator just so happen to be the most unethical, arrogant and ignorant I have ever seen and I use to love both shows. Instead they have shown that TV judges do in fact bend the facts to fit their theories rather than the correct way.