Seis extraños quedan atrapados en un metro de la ciudad de Nueva York y cambian la vida de los demás de maneras inesperadas.Seis extraños quedan atrapados en un metro de la ciudad de Nueva York y cambian la vida de los demás de maneras inesperadas.Seis extraños quedan atrapados en un metro de la ciudad de Nueva York y cambian la vida de los demás de maneras inesperadas.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
- Premios
- 5 premios ganados en total
Tim Young
- Christopher
- (as Timothy Young)
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
You have to hunt to find this gem (literally, check R/T), which tries, and mostly succeeds, to be an honest but unifying force. Giancarlo Esposito's superb portrayal of a subway bum is the exact opposite of the simmering, fastidious heavy in the long running Breaking Bad/Better Call Saul series. Half the music is excellent, especially Giancarlo singing (a non- Patsy Cline) "Crazy". But the other half is Broadway sing-song boiler plate, which is why I didn't make it a 10.
So! A very simple premise, and then so many connections and relevations, and SO much humanity! Yes, maybe that's what it is, the humanity of it. The heartfelt stories of those people.
And the characters. Now, a stuck underground with bright sharp inner light is a good place for character studies. The light helps too. The picture is so clear in this movie. Clear to see details in the faces.
And then the acting. And the people chosen for the movie. The characters chosen to be studied. The homeless guy is perfect. Hearing him speak reminded me of my time in the US. (even though I was in SF and not in NY, and that in the late 90s and 2000s). Reminded me of people I had met. Ok, the characters may be clichee, but then again, they weren't. Every one of them eas special too.
Plus it is a very original movie. A musical. Which somehow fit wonderfully in this movie. The movie is about different kinds of art in aw way too, anyway.
And the ending was wonderful too. Again, so much heartfelt humanity.
And maybe one of the messages is just that people are NOT cliche after all. That we really don't know one another and should ot judge at first sight.
In any case, a very good movie, simple and still there is so mich more to it.
And the characters. Now, a stuck underground with bright sharp inner light is a good place for character studies. The light helps too. The picture is so clear in this movie. Clear to see details in the faces.
And then the acting. And the people chosen for the movie. The characters chosen to be studied. The homeless guy is perfect. Hearing him speak reminded me of my time in the US. (even though I was in SF and not in NY, and that in the late 90s and 2000s). Reminded me of people I had met. Ok, the characters may be clichee, but then again, they weren't. Every one of them eas special too.
Plus it is a very original movie. A musical. Which somehow fit wonderfully in this movie. The movie is about different kinds of art in aw way too, anyway.
And the ending was wonderful too. Again, so much heartfelt humanity.
And maybe one of the messages is just that people are NOT cliche after all. That we really don't know one another and should ot judge at first sight.
In any case, a very good movie, simple and still there is so mich more to it.
The low budget film is not bad, but it is just really far removed from reality. I cannot imagine being in public transport, having all these highly unlikely interactions and conversations. Hence, I cannot get into the story at all.
The longest standing ovation (full house too)I can recall in many years at The Woodstock Film Festival. This film is fully engaging and so moving. We all attached to the characters and shared their discomfort, anger, sadness and confusion. The music was seamlessly worked into the dialog and it was varied and emotionally real. There wasn't a soul who left without vowing to be a more open and less judgmental person in life. GO! whenever it gets distribution!
Maybe the producers of this thing should just write this review, because I have no idea how to handle this one.
This film is about race, class, gender, poverty, disability, homelessness, and much more. It's an ensemble character musical drama whose characters end up getting stuck on the the NY subway. That scenario is the backdrop for the interaction between this group of people who represent groups who would likely never come into such intimate contact with one another and end up discussing many deep philosophical and social subjects.
On the surface, the film seems to want to air some weighty issues about race, class and gender, and opine on the evils of our entrenched societal problems and perhaps do a little to help us get "unstuck". But in doing so, it also perpetuates some of the stereotypes it wants to disrupt.
For example, when the characters are introduced, a black character is shown in a disfunctional, interracial relationship -- biased filmmakers almost never show a happy interracial relationship, they usually depict them as having problems. I don't think these filmmakers were biased because the whole point of the film was to try to discuss these tough issues. But nevertheless, the black characters and the Latino character were depicted as poor, while the white characters and the Asian character were not. The people of color were shown exhibiting intentional racism, while the white people were shown as trying to be open and accepting, but still unconsciously or inadvertently expressing bias. There were many other comments or incidents that reinforced racial stereotypes (like mentioning or showing on several occasions that Latina immigrants "do the work that Americans won't do.") I don't know why filmmakers constantly depict Latino people as lower class -- a decade ago the richest person on Earth was a Latino man.
Production-wise, it was very well made. It was originally written as a stage play and it has that stage musical feel to it. It appeared to be a relatively low-budget film, but there wasn't a lot to spend money on since the players weren't $25-million-a-pop A-listers and most of the film took place in that one location on that stuck subway. The music was great, the cinematography was well done, and the direction, writing and dialogue was top notch. And all of the main actors were fantastic without exception.
One technique I liked was the way that the filmmakers presented the vignettes that the singers were singing about -- the lyrics gave part of the story while the visuals told the difficult parts. And the other characters responded as if they got the whole message, not just the words. Very innovative. These fine filmmakers create a piece of art that starts with a collection of people who represent predefined groups, but in the end we have six well-defined individuals whose lives may not be what you expect them to be.
I'm giving this film a rating of 9, which it well deserves, it's a great film. I don't think the writers/producers had any malign intent in the way the characters were stereotyped as they were, I think that's just the way the story played out and the way the writers went about making their point, although I'd like to see a film that subtly reverses the stereotypes and portrays people of color in upper-class positions while white people are portrayed in lower-class positions and depicted as subservient to black people -- now that would make an impact!
triggers: strobe effects; violent rape scene.
rating 9/10; (submitted July 12, 2020, 10:25 a.m EDT)
This film is about race, class, gender, poverty, disability, homelessness, and much more. It's an ensemble character musical drama whose characters end up getting stuck on the the NY subway. That scenario is the backdrop for the interaction between this group of people who represent groups who would likely never come into such intimate contact with one another and end up discussing many deep philosophical and social subjects.
On the surface, the film seems to want to air some weighty issues about race, class and gender, and opine on the evils of our entrenched societal problems and perhaps do a little to help us get "unstuck". But in doing so, it also perpetuates some of the stereotypes it wants to disrupt.
For example, when the characters are introduced, a black character is shown in a disfunctional, interracial relationship -- biased filmmakers almost never show a happy interracial relationship, they usually depict them as having problems. I don't think these filmmakers were biased because the whole point of the film was to try to discuss these tough issues. But nevertheless, the black characters and the Latino character were depicted as poor, while the white characters and the Asian character were not. The people of color were shown exhibiting intentional racism, while the white people were shown as trying to be open and accepting, but still unconsciously or inadvertently expressing bias. There were many other comments or incidents that reinforced racial stereotypes (like mentioning or showing on several occasions that Latina immigrants "do the work that Americans won't do.") I don't know why filmmakers constantly depict Latino people as lower class -- a decade ago the richest person on Earth was a Latino man.
Production-wise, it was very well made. It was originally written as a stage play and it has that stage musical feel to it. It appeared to be a relatively low-budget film, but there wasn't a lot to spend money on since the players weren't $25-million-a-pop A-listers and most of the film took place in that one location on that stuck subway. The music was great, the cinematography was well done, and the direction, writing and dialogue was top notch. And all of the main actors were fantastic without exception.
One technique I liked was the way that the filmmakers presented the vignettes that the singers were singing about -- the lyrics gave part of the story while the visuals told the difficult parts. And the other characters responded as if they got the whole message, not just the words. Very innovative. These fine filmmakers create a piece of art that starts with a collection of people who represent predefined groups, but in the end we have six well-defined individuals whose lives may not be what you expect them to be.
I'm giving this film a rating of 9, which it well deserves, it's a great film. I don't think the writers/producers had any malign intent in the way the characters were stereotyped as they were, I think that's just the way the story played out and the way the writers went about making their point, although I'd like to see a film that subtly reverses the stereotypes and portrays people of color in upper-class positions while white people are portrayed in lower-class positions and depicted as subservient to black people -- now that would make an impact!
triggers: strobe effects; violent rape scene.
rating 9/10; (submitted July 12, 2020, 10:25 a.m EDT)
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaThe original musical upon which this film is based had its world premiere at Chicago's La Costa Theatre in 2008, before transferring Off-Broadway with the New York Musical Theatre Festival (NYMF) in 2012.
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Stuck?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 30 minutos
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.78 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
By what name was Stuck (2017) officially released in India in English?
Responda