En 1966, los físicos Nora y Héctor viajan al 2025. Mientras ella se adapta de maravilla, él no tanto, lo que la divide entre el amor y este nuevo mundo que empodera a las mujeres.En 1966, los físicos Nora y Héctor viajan al 2025. Mientras ella se adapta de maravilla, él no tanto, lo que la divide entre el amor y este nuevo mundo que empodera a las mujeres.En 1966, los físicos Nora y Héctor viajan al 2025. Mientras ella se adapta de maravilla, él no tanto, lo que la divide entre el amor y este nuevo mundo que empodera a las mujeres.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
If you're considering watching this movie, you might want to think twice. From the very first scene, it becomes painfully clear that this film is a mishmash of poor acting, a convoluted plot, and what seems like a budget that barely covered the cost of the snacks for the cast and crew.
The acting is perhaps the most glaring issue. The performances are so wooden that they could easily be mistaken for a high school drama club's first attempt at a serious production. The lead actor delivers lines with all the emotional depth of a cardboard cutout, while the supporting cast seems to be competing for the title of "Most Unconvincing Performance." It's hard to believe that these actors were even given the opportunity to step in front of a camera, as their lack of chemistry and dramatic range makes every scene feel like a chore to watch.
As for the plot, it's a tangled web of clichés and nonsensical twists that leave viewers scratching their heads in confusion. The premise of time travel could have been an exciting concept, but the execution is so poor that it feels more like a series of random events strung together rather than a coherent story. The timeline jumps are jarring, and the attempts at emotional stakes fall flat, leaving audiences feeling more bewildered than engaged. It's as if the writers threw darts at a board of sci-fi tropes and decided to go with whatever landed closest, resulting in a narrative that lacks any real substance or originality.
The production quality is another area where this film falters. The special effects are laughable, reminiscent of early 2000s television shows rather than a feature film. It's clear that the budget was minimal, and the lack of investment is evident in every frame. The sound design is equally subpar, with awkward audio transitions and background music that feels out of place, further detracting from any potential immersion in the story.
In conclusion, this movie is a disheartening example of how not to create a time travel drama. From the lackluster performances to the nonsensical plot and cheap production values, it's hard to find any redeeming qualities. If you're in the mood for a quality film that explores the complexities of time travel, you'd be better off looking elsewhere. Save your time and money-this is one movie that should be left in the past.
The acting is perhaps the most glaring issue. The performances are so wooden that they could easily be mistaken for a high school drama club's first attempt at a serious production. The lead actor delivers lines with all the emotional depth of a cardboard cutout, while the supporting cast seems to be competing for the title of "Most Unconvincing Performance." It's hard to believe that these actors were even given the opportunity to step in front of a camera, as their lack of chemistry and dramatic range makes every scene feel like a chore to watch.
As for the plot, it's a tangled web of clichés and nonsensical twists that leave viewers scratching their heads in confusion. The premise of time travel could have been an exciting concept, but the execution is so poor that it feels more like a series of random events strung together rather than a coherent story. The timeline jumps are jarring, and the attempts at emotional stakes fall flat, leaving audiences feeling more bewildered than engaged. It's as if the writers threw darts at a board of sci-fi tropes and decided to go with whatever landed closest, resulting in a narrative that lacks any real substance or originality.
The production quality is another area where this film falters. The special effects are laughable, reminiscent of early 2000s television shows rather than a feature film. It's clear that the budget was minimal, and the lack of investment is evident in every frame. The sound design is equally subpar, with awkward audio transitions and background music that feels out of place, further detracting from any potential immersion in the story.
In conclusion, this movie is a disheartening example of how not to create a time travel drama. From the lackluster performances to the nonsensical plot and cheap production values, it's hard to find any redeeming qualities. If you're in the mood for a quality film that explores the complexities of time travel, you'd be better off looking elsewhere. Save your time and money-this is one movie that should be left in the past.
The acting was both bad and very cliché. Besides, it was obvious that there was no chemistry between the actors. It was a shame because the subject was not bad, especially the transformation of gender relations, women's rights, gender equality, etc.
The holes in the script are also among the unnecessary flaws. The childishness in the technological and theoretical explanations is perhaps tolerable, but I'm not sure if the ridicules of the 'time machine' operation was necessary. Still, it's a watchable film for those who want to see an example of modern Mexican cinema. I hope we can see new, more mature examples of Mexican cinema.
The holes in the script are also among the unnecessary flaws. The childishness in the technological and theoretical explanations is perhaps tolerable, but I'm not sure if the ridicules of the 'time machine' operation was necessary. Still, it's a watchable film for those who want to see an example of modern Mexican cinema. I hope we can see new, more mature examples of Mexican cinema.
I think the genre isn't right; it's not a Sci-fi film. I think it carries a message of gender ideology, and it's not right to categorize it as something it isn't, as that can create false expectations. The film dubbing and makeup, especially at the end, are very poor. But I think the final message, some of the acting, and the essence of the film aren't bad; On the contrary, it sends a very powerful message about the role of women in society, the generation gap, the women relevance in society today, and the path women have taken through the time. And no, I'm not the one who thinks that the movies has to send a message, but I think the message of this movie is a good one.
It started off well, but then it became a bit corny. As a woman, I find feminism has become tiresome, it's overdone and increasingly feels like yet another narrative being pushed, especially in ways that influence young people. Everyone is shaped by their surroundings, and I don't think it's healthy for young people to be encouraged to express themselves sexually. Many people are uncomfortable with that. In fact, a lot of people are unhappy with the present, which is why they yearn for the past.
There's a growing nostalgia for the 1990s, even among younger people who never lived through it. This film treats modern times as if they're somehow superior, when in reality they often feel disconnected and artificial. Many people sense that something isn't quite right.
It would have been far more satisfying if, after everything, the protagonist realised her career hadn't brought her real meaning. That, in fact, she had been contributing to a system-driven by technology-that made people sicker and more isolated. She missed out on the love and connection that truly matter. Instead, she ends up on dating apps, where interactions feel shallow and transactional-men seem to be waiting for the next option to excite them. Everything around her lacks depth and fails to promote healthy values, and people are left feeling depressed.
These kinds of storylines seem to be used and promoted more than others, as if to calm the public to make them feel that their dissatisfaction is wrong or misplaced. They want people to see this as normal and right, when deep down we feel like it's wrong.
There's a growing nostalgia for the 1990s, even among younger people who never lived through it. This film treats modern times as if they're somehow superior, when in reality they often feel disconnected and artificial. Many people sense that something isn't quite right.
It would have been far more satisfying if, after everything, the protagonist realised her career hadn't brought her real meaning. That, in fact, she had been contributing to a system-driven by technology-that made people sicker and more isolated. She missed out on the love and connection that truly matter. Instead, she ends up on dating apps, where interactions feel shallow and transactional-men seem to be waiting for the next option to excite them. Everything around her lacks depth and fails to promote healthy values, and people are left feeling depressed.
These kinds of storylines seem to be used and promoted more than others, as if to calm the public to make them feel that their dissatisfaction is wrong or misplaced. They want people to see this as normal and right, when deep down we feel like it's wrong.
I really wanted to like Our Times, but sadly, it just didn't deliver. The storyline felt like a recycled version of every teen romance cliché out there-mean girls, love triangles, and an over-the-top "bad boy with a heart of gold." It tried hard to be nostalgic and touching, but instead came off as forced and melodramatic.
The pacing dragged in the middle, and the emotional moments felt unearned and manipulative. The characters lacked depth, especially the lead-she's portrayed as quirky and clumsy, but that's not enough to make her relatable or compelling. The ending, while trying to be sweet, felt unrealistic and overly sentimental.
Honestly, I don't understand the hype. If you're looking for a teen romance that feels fresh or sincere, there are better options out there.
The pacing dragged in the middle, and the emotional moments felt unearned and manipulative. The characters lacked depth, especially the lead-she's portrayed as quirky and clumsy, but that's not enough to make her relatable or compelling. The ending, while trying to be sweet, felt unrealistic and overly sentimental.
Honestly, I don't understand the hype. If you're looking for a teen romance that feels fresh or sincere, there are better options out there.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaAfter they reach 2025 and are about to enter the convenience store, someone gets into a DeLorean automobile and drives off - the time machine used in the movie "Back to the Future".
- ErroresAt 4:02 Nora is looking at the box containing the transducer and it says "Manufactured in U.R.S.S." The rest of the text is in English as well. However "U.R.S.S." is the Spanish acronym for the Soviet Union. The English acronym is USSR.
- ConexionesReferences Volver al futuro (1985)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
June 2025 TV and Streaming Premiere Dates
June 2025 TV and Streaming Premiere Dates
"Echo Valley" and "The Gilded Age" are two of this month's most anticipated TV releases. Check out our June calendar for more!
Detalles
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- $46,000,000 (estimado)
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 30 minutos
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 2:39
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
What is the French language plot outline for Nuestros tiempos (2025)?
Responda