Chefs compiten con habilidades culinarias, estrategia y supervivencia por el trono. Retos culturales eligen gobernantes semanales. Seis rivalizan, con eliminaciones y nuevos. Premio: $100K.Chefs compiten con habilidades culinarias, estrategia y supervivencia por el trono. Retos culturales eligen gobernantes semanales. Seis rivalizan, con eliminaciones y nuevos. Premio: $100K.Chefs compiten con habilidades culinarias, estrategia y supervivencia por el trono. Retos culturales eligen gobernantes semanales. Seis rivalizan, con eliminaciones y nuevos. Premio: $100K.
Explorar episodios
Fotos
Opiniones destacadas
Ive watched alot of chooking shows some are ok and some are great this one is not good. It might be the first that i really disliked from the first words uttered by the host ....issues i have with this
1. The host has absolutley no flare for hosting a competive cooking show he has no inflection when he talks he waves his hands like an idiot and looks uncomfortable doing it.
2. The premise of the show is ok i guess but its judging aspect is really stupid ...im guessing they are trying to be different but it doesnt work ....oh we do are judging in secret? And the host is one of the judges? Really dumb they all know who cooked what and although other shows have done this they usually watch how its made and give feedback while tasting...this show just seems off.
3. The constant ONE of you is going to be banished? Banished? Why why use that terminology. Eliminated is fine ...the throne for a winner? Why highest graded dish is safe why this goofy throne ...
4. The loser of the winner of the second cook can go head to head with "ruler" (stupid title) or send in someone else and whoeber wins gets to be next ruler....overly complicated on top of that after someone is "banished"( very stupid) they bring in another chef...thsi show could easily be rigged so that it plays out how they want it too.
I doubt this will get any better but ill give it another episode if that next one is just as bad ill be done watching it.
1. The host has absolutley no flare for hosting a competive cooking show he has no inflection when he talks he waves his hands like an idiot and looks uncomfortable doing it.
2. The premise of the show is ok i guess but its judging aspect is really stupid ...im guessing they are trying to be different but it doesnt work ....oh we do are judging in secret? And the host is one of the judges? Really dumb they all know who cooked what and although other shows have done this they usually watch how its made and give feedback while tasting...this show just seems off.
3. The constant ONE of you is going to be banished? Banished? Why why use that terminology. Eliminated is fine ...the throne for a winner? Why highest graded dish is safe why this goofy throne ...
4. The loser of the winner of the second cook can go head to head with "ruler" (stupid title) or send in someone else and whoeber wins gets to be next ruler....overly complicated on top of that after someone is "banished"( very stupid) they bring in another chef...thsi show could easily be rigged so that it plays out how they want it too.
I doubt this will get any better but ill give it another episode if that next one is just as bad ill be done watching it.
As soon as they showed the contestants and judges and because the judges knew who cooked what, we knew who the winner was.
Scott Conant is a good judge but not a good host. The overall concept, what with all the medieval motif, is corny as hell.
The Asian chef can only cook Asian food but with an Asian judge that's no problem. For the noodle challenge she makes dumplings but still wins? All her dishes reminded the Asian judge of home and her childhood. Baloney.
How about a challenge that forces her to cook something Italian or Mexican or Southern?
Rigged from the getgo because of Food Network's new obsession with Asian cooks.
Scott Conant is a good judge but not a good host. The overall concept, what with all the medieval motif, is corny as hell.
The Asian chef can only cook Asian food but with an Asian judge that's no problem. For the noodle challenge she makes dumplings but still wins? All her dishes reminded the Asian judge of home and her childhood. Baloney.
How about a challenge that forces her to cook something Italian or Mexican or Southern?
Rigged from the getgo because of Food Network's new obsession with Asian cooks.
Great cooking. The rules are what feel new here. It's going for the throat of the top dog. Contrary to letting the worst pick each other off. Very medieval. I think that's is why I liked it so much. It's cutthroat because of that.
The judging could be improved. TOC and next level chef are more fair because it is truly anonymous. It is hard to not agree that it feels like decisions are what makes it for good TV. Reads as less than meritocratic a couple of times and that's a letdown.
Also feel like it's unbalanced when you end up being on the throne near the beginning is nowhere near as important as being on the throne going in to finale. It is very lopsided. Not sure how to fix that but that should be addressed in season 2. Otherwise winning 5 times in a row is meaningless other than bragging rights unless you made it happen at the right moment.
The judging could be improved. TOC and next level chef are more fair because it is truly anonymous. It is hard to not agree that it feels like decisions are what makes it for good TV. Reads as less than meritocratic a couple of times and that's a letdown.
Also feel like it's unbalanced when you end up being on the throne near the beginning is nowhere near as important as being on the throne going in to finale. It is very lopsided. Not sure how to fix that but that should be addressed in season 2. Otherwise winning 5 times in a row is meaningless other than bragging rights unless you made it happen at the right moment.
Concept never gels...a handful of Chefs, some you may have heard of, most not, in a dark silly set cooking for two judges who know who made each dish. So no mystery, no tiebreaker, and easily could be pre-determined who goes and who gets to sit on a pleather "throne" as the "Ruler" until the next round of cooking. With Anne Burrell looking so uncomfortable that she's gone from a long running Food Network series Host to a contestant on this lackluster show. Dreary to watch the forced reactions of both Judges and Chefs, standing the entire episode in their wrinkled, often sweat-soaked attire, and a waste of some otherwise entertaining and watchable talent.
Show itself is unspectacular but good, the whole theme and host delivery is pretty cheesy but in a very deliberate way that makes it kind of acceptable.
The real star of the show is the competition and level of cooking. Most of the contenders absolutely bring it, and the ones that cook anything that isn't incredible really stand out. Really high level cooking and competition.
The judging is ok. They're animated and it's fun to watch them eat a dish that you can tell they're really enjoying. But they do know who cooks what - anonymous judging is preferable IMO.
If you like competitive cooking shows, it's worth watching. There are cooking shows with better formats, but the competition is quite fun to watch nonetheless.
The real star of the show is the competition and level of cooking. Most of the contenders absolutely bring it, and the ones that cook anything that isn't incredible really stand out. Really high level cooking and competition.
The judging is ok. They're animated and it's fun to watch them eat a dish that you can tell they're really enjoying. But they do know who cooks what - anonymous judging is preferable IMO.
If you like competitive cooking shows, it's worth watching. There are cooking shows with better formats, but the competition is quite fun to watch nonetheless.
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Color
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta