CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
5.8/10
5.3 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Agrega una trama en tu idiomaA flood threatens, Nestrians Dave and Finny build an Ark to save animals, but they're not allowed. Hazel and Leah help, but Finny and Leah fall off.A flood threatens, Nestrians Dave and Finny build an Ark to save animals, but they're not allowed. Hazel and Leah help, but Finny and Leah fall off.A flood threatens, Nestrians Dave and Finny build an Ark to save animals, but they're not allowed. Hazel and Leah help, but Finny and Leah fall off.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
- Premios
- 2 premios ganados y 1 nominación en total
Dermot Magennis
- Dave
- (English version)
- (voz)
- …
Callum Maloney
- Finny
- (English version)
- (voz)
Tara Flynn
- Hazel
- (English version)
- (voz)
Paul Tylak
- Obesey
- (English version)
- (voz)
- …
Alan Stanford
- Lion
- (English version)
- (voz)
Aileen Mythen
- Mrs. Griffin
- (English version)
- (voz)
- …
Patrick FitzSymons
- Tanglefoot
- (English version)
- (voz)
- …
Billy Dobson
- Animals
- (English version)
- (voz)
Chris Evans
- Stayput
- (USA English version)
- (voz)
Opiniones destacadas
It's absolutely a heartwarming and dynamic animated work that masterfully explores teamwork and friendship.
Set against the classic Noah's Ark IP, the film offers a fresh twist-instead of focusing on the heaviness of disaster, it generates a flurry of laughs through the daily lives of "atypical passengers." The humor is bold: at times, it playfully defies plot logic; at others, it hits the mark with characters' endearing contradictions. For example, when the clumsy yet overzealous main group messes up tasks, their exaggerated physical gestures paired with deadpan lines often leave viewers in stitches, even feeling delightfully "out of place."
What's more impressive is its solid character crafting. Every role stands out as a vivid individual with distinct traits-like the seemingly cold supporting character who hides a tender heart. This contrast between their surface personas and hidden stories lifts them beyond flat cartoon tropes, making them as relatable as people around us.
The themes of teamwork and friendship shine through naturally in the interactions of these multi-layered characters. From bickering to seamless collaboration for a shared goal, from letting go of prejudices to standing up for each other, we witness not just an adventure, but ordinary beings learning trust and responsibility amid hardships. This warmth never feels preachy; it gently seeps into the heart.
In essence, the animation wraps a genuine emotional core in a light comedic shell. With well-defined characters, fresh humor, and steady thematic delivery, it's truly a "remarkably solid standout."
Set against the classic Noah's Ark IP, the film offers a fresh twist-instead of focusing on the heaviness of disaster, it generates a flurry of laughs through the daily lives of "atypical passengers." The humor is bold: at times, it playfully defies plot logic; at others, it hits the mark with characters' endearing contradictions. For example, when the clumsy yet overzealous main group messes up tasks, their exaggerated physical gestures paired with deadpan lines often leave viewers in stitches, even feeling delightfully "out of place."
What's more impressive is its solid character crafting. Every role stands out as a vivid individual with distinct traits-like the seemingly cold supporting character who hides a tender heart. This contrast between their surface personas and hidden stories lifts them beyond flat cartoon tropes, making them as relatable as people around us.
The themes of teamwork and friendship shine through naturally in the interactions of these multi-layered characters. From bickering to seamless collaboration for a shared goal, from letting go of prejudices to standing up for each other, we witness not just an adventure, but ordinary beings learning trust and responsibility amid hardships. This warmth never feels preachy; it gently seeps into the heart.
In essence, the animation wraps a genuine emotional core in a light comedic shell. With well-defined characters, fresh humor, and steady thematic delivery, it's truly a "remarkably solid standout."
I really enjoyed it. Although the animation does not have the fine detail (fur, grass) of bigger budget movies, the action sequences, characters, visuals and the soundtrack are great. It is very fast moving and full of refreshing jokes and surprises. The creators of this movie must have had lots of fun making it. I disagree with some other reviewers - it is not your typical Noah's Ark story. Imho, it is definitely original, and not just in the main idea, but in many other aspects of the movie as well. I have not watched it with kids, but I believe small kids as well as many adults will love it. If you feel already tired of the Pixar, Disney, etc. style of animated movies, then see this one.
Commencing the movie defense in 3... 2... 1!
I, like probably many others, thought this was a generic animated motion picture "for the entire family". I was so wrong. So very wrong. Not only was it not generic; it was way better than expected. After all, it was so good, I am giving it a 9!
Okay, let's start with the premise. It is very simple. A single mother and a single father are separated from their daughter and son (respectively), and need to get back together. The daughter is a hunter-type animal who works alone, and the son is a timid-type animal with a natural gift for building things, and a love for warm hugs. It is one of THOSE movies, with the moral being "we need to work together!" It is, as I said, simple, and not terribly original.
Now, the reason I give this movie a 9 out of 10. Despite the simple old-as-dirt moral, the way it is HANDLED is great. Morals take a backseat, while the front seat gets firmly occupied by the action, the gags, and the dialogue. It is like the movie team were given complete creative freedom to come up with as many interesting scenes as possible, and they done all of them. The timing of the action is great, the lines are great, the voice acting is great, and not a single "funny" moment felt forced (to me anyway, some people are much more picky). Actually, this movie reminds me a lot of Penguins of Madagascar, in the way it's structured (simple moral, but runs on non-stop gags).
The animation has to be mentioned somewhere, so might as well mention it here. It is really good. The only parts where I thought things looked "imperfect", was every time tree branches were used. This animated movie does not have the best looking branches out there. Wood aside, all the textures and atmospheric effects are perfectly fine. And in my books "perfectly fine" equates to "nothing being wrong". The animation itself deserves a 9 as well.
You are probably asking at this point: "But what about the Ark? What about Noah? How are those elements used?" Well, I did not mark this review as containing spoilers, and I am not delivering any. Let's just say, the way the "Ark" part of the story is handled, is the most creative way I ever it seen it handled in any movie. And I'll leave it at that.
I won't spoil the ending either, but I will tell you that I did not see it coming. That was some truly great cartoon writing, and I was pleasantly surprised. Now, to reassure you somewhat, I wasn't born yesterday, and seen and read hundreds of stories. I have frames of reference, and I have developed that thing called "taste". The ending of this movie was GOOD. Trust me on that.
Last, but not least, the movie's title. It was changed for every country it was released in, if I am not mistaken. And it is funny, albeit in a sad way. It can instill the wrong impression upon the potential audience (aka, you), that the people who made this movie did not have any idea what they did. I assure you, the naming problem in no way reflects the actual content, because the movie is great. After all, if it wasn't, I wouldn't give it a 9 out of 10.
Watch it. Now. Don't be afraid. It's really good.
I, like probably many others, thought this was a generic animated motion picture "for the entire family". I was so wrong. So very wrong. Not only was it not generic; it was way better than expected. After all, it was so good, I am giving it a 9!
Okay, let's start with the premise. It is very simple. A single mother and a single father are separated from their daughter and son (respectively), and need to get back together. The daughter is a hunter-type animal who works alone, and the son is a timid-type animal with a natural gift for building things, and a love for warm hugs. It is one of THOSE movies, with the moral being "we need to work together!" It is, as I said, simple, and not terribly original.
Now, the reason I give this movie a 9 out of 10. Despite the simple old-as-dirt moral, the way it is HANDLED is great. Morals take a backseat, while the front seat gets firmly occupied by the action, the gags, and the dialogue. It is like the movie team were given complete creative freedom to come up with as many interesting scenes as possible, and they done all of them. The timing of the action is great, the lines are great, the voice acting is great, and not a single "funny" moment felt forced (to me anyway, some people are much more picky). Actually, this movie reminds me a lot of Penguins of Madagascar, in the way it's structured (simple moral, but runs on non-stop gags).
The animation has to be mentioned somewhere, so might as well mention it here. It is really good. The only parts where I thought things looked "imperfect", was every time tree branches were used. This animated movie does not have the best looking branches out there. Wood aside, all the textures and atmospheric effects are perfectly fine. And in my books "perfectly fine" equates to "nothing being wrong". The animation itself deserves a 9 as well.
You are probably asking at this point: "But what about the Ark? What about Noah? How are those elements used?" Well, I did not mark this review as containing spoilers, and I am not delivering any. Let's just say, the way the "Ark" part of the story is handled, is the most creative way I ever it seen it handled in any movie. And I'll leave it at that.
I won't spoil the ending either, but I will tell you that I did not see it coming. That was some truly great cartoon writing, and I was pleasantly surprised. Now, to reassure you somewhat, I wasn't born yesterday, and seen and read hundreds of stories. I have frames of reference, and I have developed that thing called "taste". The ending of this movie was GOOD. Trust me on that.
Last, but not least, the movie's title. It was changed for every country it was released in, if I am not mistaken. And it is funny, albeit in a sad way. It can instill the wrong impression upon the potential audience (aka, you), that the people who made this movie did not have any idea what they did. I assure you, the naming problem in no way reflects the actual content, because the movie is great. After all, if it wasn't, I wouldn't give it a 9 out of 10.
Watch it. Now. Don't be afraid. It's really good.
I got this movie for free on Google so I didn't lose any money. I figured worse comes to worse it's boring and I can delete it and lose nothing.
I was pleasantly surprised by how cute it was and it actually had a few jokes that made me laugh. Nothing new or spectacular about the whole "opposites have to work together" premises but it's tried and true so if it ain't broke don't fix it. I don't know what the deal is with people calling it Christian brainwashing or indoctrination, it literally never mentioned God or showed Noah (or any human for that matter) on screen. It's a movie about weird animals that find out how to deal with a crisis and have a happy ending. Nothing religious involved at all besides the setting. You could take Noah and the ark out of the movie entirely and achieve the same outcome. So don't let the rabid anti religious review (you know who you are) and the confusing evolution vs. creationism (you too) thing that cropped scare you away from this movie. Your kids will probably like it, it's face paced and the jokes and slapstick comedy are pretty rapid fire. It's a turn your brain off movie for children, not an art house flick.
Although not a musical it's a fun kids movie. The end takes quite a turn and is a terrific surprise.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaAlso known as 'Two By Two' in some countries.
- Créditos curiososThe first portion of the credits is accompanied by a 2D animated sequence showing what the characters get up to after the flood.
- Versiones alternativasGoogle Play Exclusive Version: Martin Sheen replaces Alan Stanford - Lion (voice) and Amy Grant replaces Tara Flynn - Hazel (voice) Total run time is approx 81 minutes vs approx 86 minutes.
- ConexionesFollowed by UUUPS 2: La Aventura Continúa (2020)
- Bandas sonorasI Got You
Performed by Tara Lee
Composed by Stephen McKeon & Tara Lee
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is All Creatures Big And Small?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Sitios oficiales
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- All Creatures Big and Small
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- EUR 8,400,000 (estimado)
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 22,783,699
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 1h 27min(87 min)
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta