The Library

FIrst off, all the positive reviews on here are clearly written by the director or someone involved in the film - they share the same weird overuse of commas and odd grammatical structure. But more importantly, no sentient being could sit through ten minutes of this without recognizing the utter and complete lack of even the tiniest shred of filmmaking going on here. This is literally one of the most pathetic excuses for a "film" I've ever seen. It is no exaggeration to say that I've seen high school film projects done in two weeks that had more intelligence and artistic talent than this gigantic turd. The "director" should be ashamed, and if it's him leaving these bogus 9-star reviews, I can guarantee him that it's not going to help - no one will watch this and walk away unscarred by its sheer, undiluted crapitude. Please, do yourself a favor, bang your head against a wall for an hour - it's much more entertaining than "6 Minutes of Death."

I review horror films for a living. This film was unique, low budget but unique. I give it 7 out of 10 stars for being original and thinking outside the box. Original Story Good Outline Actor was medium Currently on Red Box. Not really that good but better than the other eight previous movies. Ignore the poor reviews. The story's a cracker, the action is deftly executed and it's largely, a fun ride. original and ritualistic, with nice supernatural flourishes and an outcome that will surprise those unfamiliar with the original story. A wickedly entertaining, sometimes thrilling adventure. A terrific middle chapter with plenty of action, excitement and fun. The score on this movie could have been improved Hector

Okay...me and my wife can really only agree on horror films...and this was the ONLY new movie in the red box. we looked at each other and shrugged..."How bad could it be?" she asked. Dear god! Why? WHY did we even try to watch this? I looked it up online after the...VERY slow 20 minutes...which is all we could stand. The acting...what little there was...not to mention the DAZZLING (Sarcasm) special effects. The budget was $50 grand and it's just a shame it had to go into...that. I know I didn't watch the whole thing...but I have this ability to know if a movie does not capture your interest at the beginning...really get you curious and hooked...there's no point watching after a certain point...sorry.

Filming my dog sunning itself in the yard with a Fisher-Price camera for 90 min would be more entertain and FAR better acting. My child will not let me turn this off, but she's sick with a fever, so she has an excuse. I am literally still here SUFFERING 53 minutes in, which I suppose makes me the winner of these reviews by about 40 minutes. IMDb should have a 0.25 star rating, but it'd only be out of sympathy or delirium. I even thought about leaving no stars, but that wouldn't help the cause. The acting is poor, comparable to elementary school plays. The audio is REALLY bad...like 9mm 80's home movies kind of bad. The "special effects" were worse than YouTube, and that's not meant to insult YouTube. Obviously someone "KNOWS" somebody at RedBox, must be relative that owes them a favor. I want my dollar back.

Wow, what can I say? The acting was not only terrible, but the actors kept forgetting their lines, or stumbling through them making corrections as they went along. I was dumb struck with the lack of period costumes/clothes. It was set in 1860's but you had all kinds of dresses, except the actual hoop skirt dresses of the time. (I seen only one) I seen hair styles, short sleek, modern cuts, other than a few kids with braids or an adult with waist long hair, none of them had the braid, ringlets, and buns worn in the 1800,s. They wore hats from the 1700's, as well as modern style hats. Not the style of bonnets or hair attire worn in the 1800's. I especially loved the sleeping caps worn in church and during the day in public with their short hair sticking out of it. When I seen a guy walking with knicker style pants like worn in the 1600's I burst out laughing. You may be working on a short budget, but come on. Actors need to remember their lines and not say ummmm so much. I just could not get past the mixed period clothes everyone wore. I guess you just needed a long dress to play a part. If it was a modern straight maxi dress from the local clothing store it was OK. I can get past a little period inconsistencies, but this was a constant. I hung on for the first 1/2 hour hoping for any type of improvement in the movie before finally turning it off in disgust.

Waste of money and my time.