Chris Brown: A History of Violence

No shade! This story is not new. We have a whole felon in the biggest job on earth running a Nonblack house but here we go trying to continue to persecute Chris Brown! I am so tired of this narrative! I am surprised that the rating is as high as it is! Rihanna has forgiven him. They even had dates afterward. Let's face it. Chris Brown is a charmer! However, he is allowed redemption. How long must he be persecuted? It just gets annoying to see this narrative repeat and repeat continuously. I also hate how when the narrators talk like they were there. You were not there. You could do a whole story praising Chris Brown too! My hope is that the 19 year old Chris Brown has matured over 16 years since this happened! I really wish they would stop rehashing the narrative over and over again! This man has gone on to sell millions of records and has broken James Brown's records.

There are two sides to every story. People can wake up and decide to find a way to destroy someone that's how evil the world is right now, the documentary is nothing but a biased attempt to ruin a young successful man, i hope everyone who watches this will see through it. It also got one to think that maybe the young man is about to be on something that the powers that be are actually not happy with. And if it's a blessing that he got be dragged to actually shine even more than they anticipated . Until then we got watch attempts like this "documentary" not only fail but expose intentions behind media.

In this documentary where they claim it is up to the media to hold celebrities accountable and bring facts to light to prevent them from being treated differently they mention that Chris Brown did a tribute to Michael Jackson, commenting that they thought it was inappropriate for someone accused of domestic violence giving a tribute to the Prince of Pop never mentioning that Michael Jackson was accused of child molestation. The first time P Diddy is mentioned there is no reference to the video of him beating his girlfriend or that he was arrested for human trafficking, the second time he is mentioned there is a small comment made about it lasting no more than maybe 30 seconds. Where is the media calling out those celebrities as the documentary claims the media should be doing.

The one anonymous accuser of Chris Brown was a part of the documentary. During that section they cite a report saying only 10% of sexual assault charges are false. I looked up that report, it is only discussing female reports of sexual assault at one college, very limited study. A report is considered false if after an investigation there is a lack of evidence it happened, or there is evidence the accuser is lying. The anonymous accuser on the documentary had the DA never fail charges against Chris Brown because of lack of evidence and her personal attorney for a civil lawsuit dropped her and her case after it was discovered she was withholding text messages she sent to Chris Brown saying she wanted to have a relationship with him. So there were two investigations that both ended at the same conclusion: there is inadequate evidence for it to hold up in court. That seems to be the very standard of the study as to what qualifies as a false accusation, can't be sure though since they cite the study and never explain it.

Anything regarding sexual assault and domestic violence is a complex subject the understanding around which is still changing and developing. This documentary doesn't spend the time to discuss the details and criteria of the definitions and different studies and situations and making necessary connections. I don't feel sexual abuse and domestic violence is a subject a documentary should be made with unexplained facts and cliff notes, take the time to give the full details or don't bother.

Just simply not needed.

I feel like people know his story. He has been heavily criticised and even ban from countries and award shows and so on because of his history. Maybe they should do a documentary of the history of violence of politicians? People who have committed crimes yet have power in government.

Also the information provided has been discredited already. So they're just repeating stuff that has been discredited, debunked, and disproven even in a court setting. Documentaries should be balanced, and if they present an accusation they should present all the proof that refutes the accusation. This Documentary doesn't. It's just biased and one sided.

The last half of this so-called documentary is a Sunny Hostin interview with all the other bitter, masculine ladies. This is all clout chasing. You have the alleged Jane doe in the shadows. Botox lips, cat fake nails. Extended eyelashes. Vocal fry lying about these claims and her text messages show her as clingy, needy, and wanting Chris Brown. Rihanna doesn't own up to her Abuse. These girls love status. They put themselves in these positions.

Repeat: The last half of this so-called documentary is a Sunny Hostin interview with all the other bitter, masculine ladies. This is all clout chasing. You have the alleged Jane doe in the shadows. Botox lips, cat fake nails. Extended eyelashes. Vocal fry lying about these claims and her text messages show her as clingy, needy, and wanting Chris Brown. Rihanna doesn't own up to her Abuse. These girls love status. They put themselves in these positions.