Agrega una trama en tu idiomaTwo filmmakers searching for the perfect documentary subject stumble across a story that even they don't want to believe.Two filmmakers searching for the perfect documentary subject stumble across a story that even they don't want to believe.Two filmmakers searching for the perfect documentary subject stumble across a story that even they don't want to believe.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
Janlyn Williams
- Dr. Margot Philips
- (as Jan Williams)
Jimmy Stevens
- Jim
- (as Jim Stevens)
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
I can't believe this is what passes for horror nowadays. At least the tag line sounds about right. "Once you see this you can't unsee this"
This is "found footage" only if all cell phones ceased to exist and the entire thing was filmed by a guy with Parkinson's who stole an old, broken betamax camera from his grandpa's attic. The video and sound quality are so bad they're distracting. It doesn't lend an air of realism to it... in fact it pulls you out of it as you struggle to figure out what you're seeing and hearing and you wonder why on earth the quality is so bad.
2 stars because they set out to make a movie and get it distributed, and by-gum they did it. Other than that, not really worth watching.
2 stars because they set out to make a movie and get it distributed, and by-gum they did it. Other than that, not really worth watching.
This has to be a joke. I mean, who seriously thought the quality of this movie even resembles that of a real, honest-to-goodness film? There is absolutely nothing redeemable about this movie, and aside from some of the acting, it offers nothing new, unique or interesting to the Slenderman mythos, or even the found-footage sub-genre as a whole. The cast is narcissistic and unlikable (3/4th's of the film is spend "getting to know" these jerks), and once things start to get mildly interesting, it falls flat like a full and soiled diaper. Once the credits started to roll, I wondered what I was doing wasting my time on this crap. From now on, if a movie does not have at least 10 reviews, I am not even going to bother watching it. It's bad enough that these untalented people released this festival of feces onto the world, but I'll be damned if I support it with my hard earned money.
To the people responsible; if you don't have the budget, the talent or the skill, just stop. You are only making yourselves look bad, and are making a mockery of the once respect craft known as film-making. Leave film-making to people who actually understand what it takes to make a compelling movie, as you have proved to lack any ability to do so. I will be looking for your names in any future film in order to avoid it like it is contagious. Simply tragic. F-
To the people responsible; if you don't have the budget, the talent or the skill, just stop. You are only making yourselves look bad, and are making a mockery of the once respect craft known as film-making. Leave film-making to people who actually understand what it takes to make a compelling movie, as you have proved to lack any ability to do so. I will be looking for your names in any future film in order to avoid it like it is contagious. Simply tragic. F-
Have you ever wondered what an Asylum Films version of Slenderman would look like? Why? Why did you will this into reality by thinking about it? Ugh, whatever.
There have been a couple of Slenderman movies over the past couple of years, and pretty much all of them are bad. I can't speak to the quality of the HBO documentary, but I don't necessarily count that one anyway.
Although Slenderman is a beloved part of internet folklore, he's a copyrighted character. Somebody owns him and has exclusive rights to use the character. That means if you don't have his permission to make a Slenderman movie, you won't make a Slenderman movie. Unless of course, you avoid ever using the character's actual name or likeness, play with him just enough to make him recognizable but never actually show him, and just call him a "Slender Being" instead of his actual name.
That's how this movie came to be. A zero-budget, zero-talent, zero- originality schlockfest that rips off the notability and likeness of Slenderman but stops just short of anything that can get them sued, this is a Z-movie bootleg.
Even if you can forgive the movie for being a tasteless ripoff (I can forgive "Due Date" for being a blatant ripoff of "Planes, Trains and Automobiles" because it's entertaining) you'll find yourself being slowly tortured by the bad editing, endless filler, scenes that never pay off, scenes that have nothing to do with the rest of the movie, scenes of people yammering about nothing, and massive flaws that go directly against the most basic rules of filmmaking. This movie is a disaster, like bad poetry in motion.
If I held this movie to normal standards, I'd have to call it one of the worst films ever made. However, I can't even count this as a real film. Generally, "indie" films are excluded from my list of the very worst (because there's so, so many bad ones) unless they can hit that sweet spot where they're coherent enough to count as a real movie, but bad enough to be garbage.
This is not coherent enough to be a "real" film. This movie is a mess. This is a bootleg Slenderman film, and it isn't even a good bootleg. Avoid it like you'd avoid the real Slenderman.
There have been a couple of Slenderman movies over the past couple of years, and pretty much all of them are bad. I can't speak to the quality of the HBO documentary, but I don't necessarily count that one anyway.
Although Slenderman is a beloved part of internet folklore, he's a copyrighted character. Somebody owns him and has exclusive rights to use the character. That means if you don't have his permission to make a Slenderman movie, you won't make a Slenderman movie. Unless of course, you avoid ever using the character's actual name or likeness, play with him just enough to make him recognizable but never actually show him, and just call him a "Slender Being" instead of his actual name.
That's how this movie came to be. A zero-budget, zero-talent, zero- originality schlockfest that rips off the notability and likeness of Slenderman but stops just short of anything that can get them sued, this is a Z-movie bootleg.
Even if you can forgive the movie for being a tasteless ripoff (I can forgive "Due Date" for being a blatant ripoff of "Planes, Trains and Automobiles" because it's entertaining) you'll find yourself being slowly tortured by the bad editing, endless filler, scenes that never pay off, scenes that have nothing to do with the rest of the movie, scenes of people yammering about nothing, and massive flaws that go directly against the most basic rules of filmmaking. This movie is a disaster, like bad poetry in motion.
If I held this movie to normal standards, I'd have to call it one of the worst films ever made. However, I can't even count this as a real film. Generally, "indie" films are excluded from my list of the very worst (because there's so, so many bad ones) unless they can hit that sweet spot where they're coherent enough to count as a real movie, but bad enough to be garbage.
This is not coherent enough to be a "real" film. This movie is a mess. This is a bootleg Slenderman film, and it isn't even a good bootleg. Avoid it like you'd avoid the real Slenderman.
While the movie itself couldn't use the likeness or even the actual look of the iconic creepypasta, the film itself was alright, nothing too good and somewhat breaking the rules of it's own idea being that of found footage, meaning the film constantly uses stuff other than just the main characters cameras such as a screen capture of a call with the main characters around the middle of the film. It tends to feel very fan film esq, in which case I'd have said watch many of the others that are online. While the film itself is free on YouTube via Popcornflix. I still have to respect the creators for at least trying to build a form of mystery, however the main characters aren't likable all too much and honestly make me root for this tall faceless monster to kill them already. The characters interactions do feel somewhat genuine at times however it doesn't save the film from coming off as very midrange YouTube production and the lack of Slender Man overall does hurt the film. Overall 5/10, for what it did, it did okay, but it could've been so much more.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaThe film was made without Slender Man's owner Mythology Entertainment's permission. Consequently, the producers had to bleep out any reference to the name "Slender Man" and could not use his likeness.
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Slender?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 30 minutos
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.78 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
By what name was Slender (2016) officially released in Canada in English?
Responda