CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
4.7/10
2.3 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Agrega una trama en tu idiomaTeenage friends out for beach week get unexpectedly detoured to a isolated motel where a deadly STD virus now runs rampant, turning those infected into the living dead.Teenage friends out for beach week get unexpectedly detoured to a isolated motel where a deadly STD virus now runs rampant, turning those infected into the living dead.Teenage friends out for beach week get unexpectedly detoured to a isolated motel where a deadly STD virus now runs rampant, turning those infected into the living dead.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
- Premios
- 9 premios ganados y 15 nominaciones en total
David B. Meadows
- Officer
- (as David Meadows)
Opiniones destacadas
Not knowing what to expect from this one I saw it was supposed to be a funny horror. Funny horrors mostly doesn't work out but there are exceptions like this one.
Let me be straight, this is a no-brainer. Just sit and enjoy. For some people this will be over the top because it's all about teens eager to have sex and terribly going wrong but you will see if you watching this flick. The flick starts immediately with pure horror and before you know it you are into a funny ride full of gore gore ,a bit of nudity and gore.
I can't spoil what is going on but it all starts with necrophilia. From there on the virus is on his way to conquer the world.
And just when you think that this flick is falling down on humour when a guy is having sex in the dark with his girlfriend, you're in for another ride of...well, just pick this up if you do like for example Tucker And Dale (2010) or the Ash vs Evil Dead series.
I enjoyed it a lot and had a smile throughout the whole flick.
Gore 3/5 Nudity 1,5/5 Effects 4/5 Story 2/5 Comedy 2/5
Let me be straight, this is a no-brainer. Just sit and enjoy. For some people this will be over the top because it's all about teens eager to have sex and terribly going wrong but you will see if you watching this flick. The flick starts immediately with pure horror and before you know it you are into a funny ride full of gore gore ,a bit of nudity and gore.
I can't spoil what is going on but it all starts with necrophilia. From there on the virus is on his way to conquer the world.
And just when you think that this flick is falling down on humour when a guy is having sex in the dark with his girlfriend, you're in for another ride of...well, just pick this up if you do like for example Tucker And Dale (2010) or the Ash vs Evil Dead series.
I enjoyed it a lot and had a smile throughout the whole flick.
Gore 3/5 Nudity 1,5/5 Effects 4/5 Story 2/5 Comedy 2/5
Morgue janitor Cornelius (Wayne W. Johnson) doesn't read the toe tags
if he did, then he probably wouldn't have climbed on board a Jane Doe for a spot of necro-nookie: according to the girl's label, she either died of radiation exposure or an unknown STD. Either way, it's bad news for Cornelius, who turns into a manky zombie rapist who quickly spreads his infection to his wife, who in turn spreads the infection to her mailman, who proceeds to transmit the disease to a gas station attendant. Before long, there are sex mad zombies all over the place—bad news for a group of teenagers who stop for the night at a nearby motel on their way to spring break.
I've been known to enjoy very low-brow movies in the past, but Night of Something Strange takes puerile vulgarity and crass horror to a whole new level, so much so that I actually felt embarrassed for those taking part—not just because the actors are required to perform lurid acts that are above and beyond the call of duty, but because the finished product just isn't amusing enough to make their debasement worthwhile. Used tampon eating, a fart-in-the-face gag that involves follow through, a masturbation scene, accidental male-on-male butt sex (the film's absolute nadir, which is preceded by some rimming), a tidal wave of zombie ejaculate, and mutated genitalia: just some of the outrageousness on offer that I found too tasteless and moronic to tickle my funny bone.
I've been known to enjoy very low-brow movies in the past, but Night of Something Strange takes puerile vulgarity and crass horror to a whole new level, so much so that I actually felt embarrassed for those taking part—not just because the actors are required to perform lurid acts that are above and beyond the call of duty, but because the finished product just isn't amusing enough to make their debasement worthwhile. Used tampon eating, a fart-in-the-face gag that involves follow through, a masturbation scene, accidental male-on-male butt sex (the film's absolute nadir, which is preceded by some rimming), a tidal wave of zombie ejaculate, and mutated genitalia: just some of the outrageousness on offer that I found too tasteless and moronic to tickle my funny bone.
This movie is unbelieveable dumb, playing with dozends of clichés of horror movies. Starting with a pervert in a coroner hall, disturbing the.dignity of the death by doing sexual misbehavior, over a botched spring break to total absurdity. It has more than disgusting scenes and simply no real story. I must admit that some of the scenes were that irritating absurd that I couldn't hold on laughing. But that was more reflexevly than because of the "fun" it pretends to spread. Sure there were some unintentional funny moments, but too less.
I don't know why I watched it until the end. I guess I did, because I wanted to know if that rubish can get lower and - surprise - it did every few Minutes. It's not that I don't like gory horror movies including sex scenes, but this one is just silly and somehow infantile.
My conclusion is that it is unintentionally funny at some moments, but also unbearable disgusting, brutally aggressive and at the end not really worth watching it. I still gave it a 4/10. That's.to be attributed to the fascination of the absurdity it provides for itself.
I don't know why I watched it until the end. I guess I did, because I wanted to know if that rubish can get lower and - surprise - it did every few Minutes. It's not that I don't like gory horror movies including sex scenes, but this one is just silly and somehow infantile.
My conclusion is that it is unintentionally funny at some moments, but also unbearable disgusting, brutally aggressive and at the end not really worth watching it. I still gave it a 4/10. That's.to be attributed to the fascination of the absurdity it provides for itself.
Saw the movie at the Phoenix Film Festival, where it won for Best Horror Movie. We were wary that it was going to be predictable and cover the same well-trod ground as many similar-sounding movies. Teens celebrating graduation, attacked by a monster out in the country. Dying one by one.
No reason to fear that. The director, who spoke at the end of the movie, along with a couple of the actors, said he wanted to make this one exactly as he wanted. He had made a couple of other movies in which the content had been constrained by others. He decided to take this one over the top and throw everything into it. He mentioned some other effects that they couldn't get right, so they didn't get in.
They weren't necessary. It turned out to be interesting and inventive enough without them.
Be warned, you may cringe a few times and it might make you a little queasy if you have those types of problems. But it is a lot of fun if you can stand it.
No reason to fear that. The director, who spoke at the end of the movie, along with a couple of the actors, said he wanted to make this one exactly as he wanted. He had made a couple of other movies in which the content had been constrained by others. He decided to take this one over the top and throw everything into it. He mentioned some other effects that they couldn't get right, so they didn't get in.
They weren't necessary. It turned out to be interesting and inventive enough without them.
Be warned, you may cringe a few times and it might make you a little queasy if you have those types of problems. But it is a lot of fun if you can stand it.
I will waste not one more word then necessary on this piece of crap film.
My summary essentially sums up the movie as a whole....
It's so blatantly obvious the morons who have given this film a 3 or above, let alone 9 and 10 out of 10 ratings are directly connected to the making of this film, are related to the film maker (who I won't bother to mention as the person deserves less then the credit of even mentioning their name) or are paid to rate the film. IMDb is an awesome tool to gauge the quality (or lack thereof), temperature, style and merits of any film in its vast data base, but, IMO, must weed out those who clearly are on the proverbial "payroll" of all involved by positive ratings for their own agenda.
Of the many film Genra's I enjoy, Horror is among the top three and I am not adverse to films considered to be "out there" or even devoid of a solid plot. That said, this waste of time film is nothing less then putrid. In every way imaginable. Even for its "shock value" scenes which are so terribly acted, filmed, directed and set to music fit for "C" level films, it's up there among one of the top three worst movies I've ever seen. And I've seen 1000+ films over the past 35 years.
Please IMDb, figure out a way to vet your user reviews as to not waste people's money or more importantly, time, as a potential viewer relies on the user reviews more so then professional critics. I believe the public tends to be much more fair and honest when reviewing a film. We have no agenda, nothing to gain by writing a review other then to help others in deciding whether or not to view a film by Championing said film or Dead-Panning it.
As for me, and I have reviewed many films on this site as well as have much experience in film viewing, if I could give this film a -10, I would.
Horror fans, run for your lives! Or, at least away from your TV screen.
My summary essentially sums up the movie as a whole....
It's so blatantly obvious the morons who have given this film a 3 or above, let alone 9 and 10 out of 10 ratings are directly connected to the making of this film, are related to the film maker (who I won't bother to mention as the person deserves less then the credit of even mentioning their name) or are paid to rate the film. IMDb is an awesome tool to gauge the quality (or lack thereof), temperature, style and merits of any film in its vast data base, but, IMO, must weed out those who clearly are on the proverbial "payroll" of all involved by positive ratings for their own agenda.
Of the many film Genra's I enjoy, Horror is among the top three and I am not adverse to films considered to be "out there" or even devoid of a solid plot. That said, this waste of time film is nothing less then putrid. In every way imaginable. Even for its "shock value" scenes which are so terribly acted, filmed, directed and set to music fit for "C" level films, it's up there among one of the top three worst movies I've ever seen. And I've seen 1000+ films over the past 35 years.
Please IMDb, figure out a way to vet your user reviews as to not waste people's money or more importantly, time, as a potential viewer relies on the user reviews more so then professional critics. I believe the public tends to be much more fair and honest when reviewing a film. We have no agenda, nothing to gain by writing a review other then to help others in deciding whether or not to view a film by Championing said film or Dead-Panning it.
As for me, and I have reviewed many films on this site as well as have much experience in film viewing, if I could give this film a -10, I would.
Horror fans, run for your lives! Or, at least away from your TV screen.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaProduction went through 3 different make-up effects artist. The first dropped out 6 weeks before production. The second was fired after 3 weeks of filming. The third stayed on till completion. Digital masking had to be added to fix make-up in post-production prolonging post for more than a year.
- ErroresLove the woman smoking while crawling away from her attacker.
- Créditos curiososThere is a blooper reel during the end credits.
- ConexionesFollowed by She Kills (2016)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Night of Something Strange?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Sitios oficiales
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- Night of the STD's
- Locaciones de filmación
- Stephens City, Virginia, Estados Unidos(location)
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- USD 40,000 (estimado)
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 37 minutos
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.78 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
What is the Spanish language plot outline for Night of Something Strange (2016)?
Responda