Live from the Other Side with Tyler Henry

I think Tyler is great but this really doesn't showcase his ability to connect with people and the quality of his work. That being said the reviews on here were unfairly harsh and over the top so I wanted to write an honest one.

I will say I agree that I liked the narrative of his second show along with non-celebrities being read the most. Several reasons why. Nobody can claim he used Wikipedia and its more inspiring to see a person who has waited a long period to get a reading. I said in another post that I liked Tyler giving non-celebrities readings for the same reason I like Billy Joel not selling his front row seats.

I support this guy and feel like he really has a great heart. The show has a lot of people on a couch with limited time. I feel like this is challenging for everyone. I do think it has a place though.

The previous series was so much better - there was an engaging narrative and a host of personal stories relating to Tyler and his mum and from those he read. Visiting homes of ordinary folks and hearing their account was down to earth, real and engaging

Now, we have a boring sleeked-up studio setting with very boring 'celebrities' that nobody knows who - and they have no compelling stories to tell. Gone also is the guy next door charm of Tyler who used to visit folks in charming everyday clothings. Now he's got styled-up hair and clothes that are just as fake as his guests.

Tyler himself looks and sounds uncomfortable and his speech doesn't at all flow naturally like it did in the last series.

The readings are now incomprehensible ramblings with no focus, no engaging background offered by his plastic guests, no narrative flow, just no nothing.

Very disappointing. Can someone do a reading and tell me where the real Tyler Henry is? Sob sob.

This guy looks like the Hanson brother that went to the dark side, his sweating due to effort communicating with the other side, really? I didn't think looking up Wikipedia was so straining, his fox anchor lookalike co presenter has a dead husband, he shoehorned that fact in in the first ten minutes, his verbal diarrhoea with no actual facts being so vague as to be unintelligible is grasped at by seemingly nice people who deserve better, (I don't actually know who they are really) it felt like an episode of the mentalist, I kept expecting Simon Baker to jump out and Lisbon to arrest him. I pondered as to whether the next Netflix special he'll be on is an investigation into him.

Love Tyler, hate his new show. He's excellent with one on one show. This multi person show is confusing, not entertaining, and this Amanda is interfering with any flow. Loved all his other shows and was enthralled but this show sucks I gave it many tries but yuk!!! I mute the tv every time Amanda opens her mouth. Then I never finish a show due to the confusing unfinished sentences and thoughts. Please Tyler go back to one on ones!!! You are wonderful and truly have a wonderful gift. You help so many people through the rough times. I truly enjoy your other shows, and love your Mother. Your a great son!

• Cathy.

I watched a few of his readings on You tube before the series came out, and found it interesting, but still questioned the validity. Tyler's claims not to have ever heard of some of these very famous celebrities seem a little suspect. And 95% of the facts he reveals to them are very much in the public domain and easily found online. And I find Tyler's persona a bit grating and some what patronising. BUT, and it's a big but, (I cannot lie) there are several instances where he seems to deliver some information that no-one outside of the immediate circle could have known. Now, naysayers might suggest he had some inside information, but all the same, it at least leaves a question mark.