Animals

The woes of a young couple addicted to cocaine and drifting through a homeless existence in Chicago may not sound like an enticing piece of entertainment. In fact, it threatens to be one of those earnest but dreary "social problems" dramas you might go to only out of a vague sense of obligation. And the title, "Animals," doesn't help matters.

Surprisingly, and pleasingly, "Animals" proves to be not only a movie that's "good for you" but also a movie which engrosses and entertains in an easy manner which seems deceptively effortless. Much of this credit goes to the two leads, David Dastmalchian and Kim Shaw, and to the script (by Dastmalchian) which shows us the various ways these two survive through guile and petty crime. You don't approve of what they do and you certainly don't envy their lives and yet they retain a likable quality and don't seem to be that far removed from our own selves.

Each of the supporting characters is well-cast and effective.

Those seeking a movie which veers from the usual multiplex offerings would be well-advised to consider "Animals."

"I eat your tears and I save them right up in my belly. I'm Popeye. Your tears are my spinach. They make me strong. That's not fair. I'm the one who might have cancer. I need spinach."

Are you looking for a movie that'll make you instantly happy or that'll make your heart beat faster because of the tension? Look further, because "Animals" doesn't fulfill these requirements whatsoever. What a tremendously depressing and slow film this is. A sketch of two hopeless cases living on the edge of society and whose desolate life only consists of committing petty crimes in order to provide money for their basic needs : a daily dose of heroin or a line of coke. They drive around all day in a dilapidated car and try to kill their time with useless activities such as their daily visit to the zoo. The only thing you wonder after a while is whether or not their relationship is solely based on their stubborn addiction.

I remember being shocked after watching "Christiane F. - Wir Kinder vom Bahnhof Zoo" when I was younger. This was also such a depressing film about the devastating effect of heroin and the certainty that those who used it would eventually die from an overdose. "Animals" didn't leave me unmoved either. Even though it sometimes felt more easy-going and you'll be spared from sickening images of withdrawal symptoms. Jude (David Dastmalchian) and Bobbie (Kim Shaw) have a whole series of scamming tricks they use regularly on innocent people, to get some money. And when they succeed in it, the money is gone in the shortest time. All spent on some precious bags full of white powder. And every time when they've used the drugs, they realize that life can't continue like this. That they should find a way out. This was the last time they used again. Especially when they bump into a couple of corrupt policemen who expropriate their hard-earned money and little bit of drugs. But when the first withdrawal symptoms appear, it's back to the same old routine.

I do like survival films, but not exactly this kind of survival films. Ultimately, this is nothing but a portrait of two people trying to survive. It was terrible to see how far they would go out of despair. They both realize all too well what state they are in. They even wonder how they've ended up in this situation. Two white Americans with a proper education and both reasonably intelligent. In the end they compare it with the stupidity of birds that keep flying into the same window time after time. So it's dismissed as just their own stupidity and that's that. So despite the awareness and sometimes rising urge to quit, the two of them can't make that crucial step towards salvation from this deadly sh*t.

Fortunately I don't have any experience with such drugs. Though other experiences are kind of similar to Jude's and Bobbie's hopeless addiction. The renditions of David Dastmalchian and Kim Shaw seemed to me realistic enough. Superb acting and wonderful to see how they shift between different moods all the time. Even the physical appearances of these two addicts changes in a convincing manner as they exhibit withdrawal symptoms. Jude is an intelligent young guy, but he's also unreliable and selfish. Bobbie usually looks like a real slob, until they are doing the call girl trick and she starts to dress up. At that moment she reincarnates into a wonderful and beautiful looking woman. The supporting roles are of secondary importance as they come and go. The entire film focuses on the two main characters only.

Eventually, the whole film is just a series of fragments about human decay, despair and misery. And this interspersed with brief flashbacks (with drugs always in a leading role) and moments when the duo tries to get money. Until disaster strikes and then it goes straight to the denouement. And that's where this movie moved me. That specific moment proves that there's indeed still a close and intimate bond between those two. An endearing gesture. Perhaps a glimmer of hope for success. "Animals" is a moving film that contains a kind of twisted love story, showing how an animal instinct seizes a human being whose body screams for drugs. What a sublime movie!

More reviews here : http://bit.ly/1KIdQMT

Jude and Bobbie are a pair of drug addicts living in their car. Supposedly they're in love, but each day their first priority is to find the drugs required to feed their habit. They finance this dismal lifestyle through scams and thieving, and as the days pass they become increasingly squalid, reckless and pathetic.

The two lead characters seem to care for each other, and the actors' performances are intense and convincing, making it a grueling task to watch them destroy their minds and bodies. Their story has a shallow narrative arc, and doesn't possess much upbeat content, mostly consisting of bleak episodes which spiral inexorably downwards. Sympathy for their dilemma is diluted since the script provides only vague hints what led them onto this dangerous and self-destructive path. The conclusion does offer a glimmer of hope, but the main point of 'Animals' seems to be a cautionary tale warning others not to follow this miserable way of life. The opioid epidemic currently raging across America provides ample justification for this type of material. Hopefully it will have a positive effect.

As far as heroin addiction movies go this is far more similar to 'Candy' than Requiem for a Dream or Trainspotting as it follows the romance between two lovers who have fallen into the depths of addiction.

I had rather high hopes for this movie but felt it falling short compared to other romantic junkie flicks like Candy as the movie is a 'character piece' exploring the couples daily struggles rather than having a strong plot/storyline.

I normally love explorative character movies but these particular addicts just weren't particually interesting and I felt the dialog fell a little flat. Either the movie could of done with an extra half an hour of dialog or more of a story/obstacle for the protagonists to overcome.

If you enjoy films on addiction then you will probably enjoy this one but just go in knowing its not up to the standard of Candy or Trainspotting as neither the characters or plot are quite as deep.

I can only imagine the novel is far better as it would give the writer far more time to explore the highs and lows of addiction as well as drawing the viewer into caring more for the characters involved.

Overall I'd give it a 6.5 out of 10.

It speaks well to filmmaker Collin Schiffli that while this was his first full-length feature (following several shorts), it boasts high production values and discernible polish that can't be said for all debuts. Likewise, it marked David Dastmalchian's first time writing a full-length feature (following a couple shorts), but even here he illustrates keen intelligence that results in a fiercely strong, compelling story. Many are those films that have been made about drug addiction and connected struggles, but not all of them are able to pack as much of a punch as this one does, and that 'Animals' is as rich and impactful as it is says so much about the skills of all involved. In fact, for as tight and hard-hitting as it is, I rather think this stands notably taller than no few similar titles. It's a step or two (or three) too far to say that this is "enjoyable," but it's deeply absorbing and keeps us locked in from start to finish, and is absolutely worth exploring for anyone seeking a solid drama.

The picture is perhaps a smidgen imbalanced just in terms of tone, for while in the first act it's unexpectedly light (stopping just short of comedy-drama territory, to be honest), right around the halfway point we get an enormous shift that could scarcely be more unflinchingly bleak. That harsh dourness sticks around for a fair while until the last small stretch is characterized by a more bittersweet mood. However, chief characters Jude and Bobbie are centered all the while in a fashion that marks this ultimately as a tale more about their relationship than about their addictions - albeit a relationship that's defined primarily BY those addictions - and as such the entirety is able to remain a bit more centered and cohesive than it otherwise would have. Furthermore, it's readily evident that Dastmalchian wrote his script from a very personal place of past experiences, and that intimacy as much as the characters' (if not more so) allows the proceedings to resonate with a vitality that's undeniable. Jude and Bobbie are given meaningful character arcs that only bolster the power of the storytelling, and the scene writing is deftly varied while carrying substantial weight as the runtime elapses. Dreary as the movie is overall, in his writing alone Dastmalchian lends it a commanding magnetic presence, and I could hardly be more pleased with the result.

Moreover, I hope some day the man tries his hand at directing, because he seems to have most other aspects of film-making down pat, and that includes admirable acting skills. I couldn't possibly pick a favorite between Dastmalchian and co-star Kim Shaw, for both illustrate terrific range, nuance, and emotional depth that on the basis of this alone makes me want to find more from each. Though Schiffli's job as director is surely made easier with such a robust screenplay, and such a great cast, his direction is firm and focused, ever maximizing the potency to be derived from all the component parts. He also demonstrates a sharp eye for detail, which is particularly welcome here since there is so much of it to take in. The production design and art direction are superb, not to mention costume design, hair, and makeup: in every capacity we, as viewers, are fully immersed into Jude and Bobbie's sordid world, from the car that they live in, to the dealers they parlay with, to their paraphernalia, and the scams and petty theft they engage in for survival and to feed their addiction. Ian Hultquist's music rather sticks to the background, but subtly lends to the mood as it peeks up; kudos to cinematographer Larkin Donley and editor Amanda C. Griffin, who so capably helped to give shape to the feature. Really, all around 'Animals' is very well done.

I can understand how this won't appeal to everyone, not even taking into account the subject matter. For my part, though, I'm tremendously pleased with how strong this is in every regard, and I'm happy to give it a very high, hearty recommendation. Whether you're a big fan of someone involved or just seeking an engrossing, satisfying drama, as far as I'm concerned 'Animals' is fantastic, and worth much more than the time it takes to watch.