Mayo de 1984. Un camionero de helados entra al concurso Press Your Luck guardando un secreto: la clave para ganar dinero sin fin. Pero su racha ganadora se ve amenazada cuando los ejecutivos... Leer todoMayo de 1984. Un camionero de helados entra al concurso Press Your Luck guardando un secreto: la clave para ganar dinero sin fin. Pero su racha ganadora se ve amenazada cuando los ejecutivos descubren sus verdaderas motivaciones.Mayo de 1984. Un camionero de helados entra al concurso Press Your Luck guardando un secreto: la clave para ganar dinero sin fin. Pero su racha ganadora se ve amenazada cuando los ejecutivos descubren sus verdaderas motivaciones.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
- Premios
- 2 nominaciones en total
Opiniones destacadas
Let me take you back to 1984. Michael Larson, an AC repair man and ice cream truck driver, ends up on the game show Press Your Luck. THE LUCKIEST MAN IN AMERICA tells this true story. Michael (Paul Walter Hauser) keeps winning, with no end in sight. This causes everybody at CBS to panic in their own ways, including the host Peter Tomarken (Walton Goggins), the producer Bill Carruthers (David Strathairn), his assistant Chuck (Shamier Anderson), and the show's assistant Sylvia (Maisie Williams). This movie is entertaining from start to finish. Hauser is amazing yet again as a character who is socially awkward. When you look at him, you can't shake the feeling that something's off. Goggins is always great in everything he does, no surprise there. The tension builds as the movie goes on, highlighted by the score and by Hauser's body language. Not knowing what actually happened back then, I had no idea where it was going. My one problem was the ending. It seemed abrupt and I'm not sure if it's because of the low budget, but I would've liked to have a little more finality to it. I do recommend staying during the credits though. Overall, THE LUCKIEST MAN IN AMERICA is a very entertaining historical moment brought back into the light of day with a great ensemble cast, seemingly accurate enough to what actually happened at the time. I recommend it wherever you can find it!
The Luckiest Man in America was a fascinating watch for me, especially because it's based on a true story I hadn't heard before. It follows a man who managed to con his way onto a game show and ended up getting incredibly lucky while on it. I was completely unfamiliar with the real-life event or the man at the center of it, which made the film all the more intriguing.
What really grabbed my attention was how quickly the story pulled me in. It's one of those movies where, as soon as it ends, you immediately want to Google the real events to find out what actually happened. And in this case, there's a surprising amount of additional bizarre and fascinating information about the guy that didn't make it into the film.
As for the movie itself, I'd call it a solid one-time watch. It presents an unusual slice of 1980s history in an entertaining way. It's not necessarily a film you'd revisit, but it succeeds in shining a light on a quirky, forgotten moment in pop culture. You watch it, think "Well, that was interesting," and move on-now I'm a little more informed about one of the oddest stories to come out of the game show world.
What really grabbed my attention was how quickly the story pulled me in. It's one of those movies where, as soon as it ends, you immediately want to Google the real events to find out what actually happened. And in this case, there's a surprising amount of additional bizarre and fascinating information about the guy that didn't make it into the film.
As for the movie itself, I'd call it a solid one-time watch. It presents an unusual slice of 1980s history in an entertaining way. It's not necessarily a film you'd revisit, but it succeeds in shining a light on a quirky, forgotten moment in pop culture. You watch it, think "Well, that was interesting," and move on-now I'm a little more informed about one of the oddest stories to come out of the game show world.
Luckiest Man in America is a textbook case of wasted potential. You've got a talented cast firing on all cylinders-delivering nuanced, emotionally sharp performances that deserved way better material. But the story? It drags like a flat tire on a cross-country road trip.
The pacing is glacial, the plot feels like it's searching for meaning in all the wrong places, and by the halfway mark, you're not wondering what happens next-you're wondering how much longer you have to sit through it. It's less "luckiest man in America" and more "audience stuck in narrative limbo."
To be fair, the performances alone kept this from dropping into total disaster territory. But great acting can only do so much when the story they're trapped in is meandering, repetitive, and about as gripping as a lukewarm cup of decaf.
Verdict: Strong cast, weak script. If you're watching for the actors, sure-just don't expect them to save the movie from itself.
The pacing is glacial, the plot feels like it's searching for meaning in all the wrong places, and by the halfway mark, you're not wondering what happens next-you're wondering how much longer you have to sit through it. It's less "luckiest man in America" and more "audience stuck in narrative limbo."
To be fair, the performances alone kept this from dropping into total disaster territory. But great acting can only do so much when the story they're trapped in is meandering, repetitive, and about as gripping as a lukewarm cup of decaf.
Verdict: Strong cast, weak script. If you're watching for the actors, sure-just don't expect them to save the movie from itself.
The list of things that didn't happen is way longer than the list of things that actually happened, and the stuff that actually happened is far more interesting.
Yes, Michael did go on the show and win big by memorizing the patterns on the board. But that's where the true part ends. Everything else that happened, him wandering on to another talk show, breaking into his truck and watching tapes, calling his wife and putting her on the show, the list goes on.
The movie is well cast, but not well written. If you want to watch a more interesting telling of the story, go watch "Big Bucks: The Press Your Luck Scandal"
Yes, Michael did go on the show and win big by memorizing the patterns on the board. But that's where the true part ends. Everything else that happened, him wandering on to another talk show, breaking into his truck and watching tapes, calling his wife and putting her on the show, the list goes on.
The movie is well cast, but not well written. If you want to watch a more interesting telling of the story, go watch "Big Bucks: The Press Your Luck Scandal"
After watching this I thought had they stayed away from some fantasy elements and just told the guys actual story it would have been a better watch. Game Show Network made their own version of Michael Larsons story and it was better because it was factual.
This film could have even done follow up of how Larson cashed in the money for $1 bills after a radio station had a prize if you matched a serial number. Then when arriving home from a Christmas party he and his wife discovered the money has been stolen. That would have been more interesting than eating time of Larson wandering around the set of CBS and interrupting a talk show. I highly doubt this happened!
This film reminded me of the recent Weird Al biopic which also started straight then turned into a farce.
This film could have even done follow up of how Larson cashed in the money for $1 bills after a radio station had a prize if you matched a serial number. Then when arriving home from a Christmas party he and his wife discovered the money has been stolen. That would have been more interesting than eating time of Larson wandering around the set of CBS and interrupting a talk show. I highly doubt this happened!
This film reminded me of the recent Weird Al biopic which also started straight then turned into a farce.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaWhile in the film David Strathairn plays a CBS TV producer. he previously played another CBS figure, journalist Edward R. Murrow in Buenas noches, buena suerte (2005).
- ErroresJohnny Knoxville (Talk show Host) asks Michael Larson if he knows him and suggests "not from America's Most Wanted right?", yet AMW does not appear on television until 1988, 4 years after the game show events.
- Créditos curiososWrap-up footage from the actual broadcast follows the director and producers credits followed by the crawling movie credits.
- ConexionesReferences 60 Minutes (1968)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Sitios oficiales
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- Найщасливіший чоловік Америки
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Total en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 433,617
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 284,744
- 6 abr 2025
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 482,543
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 31 minutos
- Color
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta