La mejor hermana

I really wanted to like this as it features two talented and likeable leads, especially Elizabeth Banks. I also love a mystery thriller.

However, it was too heavy on the social commentary, which doesn't reflect reality and therefore becomes distracting. Firstly it featured the trope of the black women whose only purpose is to support the white female leads with no complexity of their own; meanwhile the themes includuded that everyone is LGBQT and the majority of men are violent, stupid or drunk. Drunk men are bad, while drunk women are complex and redeemable. Looking forward to a time when we can just watch tv and movies that focus on being human and on original, creative story-telling.

Not feeling the suspense, no plot twists, nothing exciting. Not sure if the segments with the dead husband/father are a dream or a hallucination or if they're doing a flashback moment. They seemed to be using them only to fill-in because they couldn't figure out what else to write. This literally puts me to sleep. I keep replaying what I missed after I fell asleep, hoping that there was something worth watching, but to no avail. Still confused only five episodes in and considering just giving up but want to see it all the way through to see if it has any redeeming value. Maybe I'll have a better rating at the end or maybe not.

Just as with Bad Sisters, it was great seeing the dynamic of the sisters and how they loved and protected each other. Jessica Biel and Elizabeth Banks had a wonderful chemistry between them. While the husband in The Better Sister was definitely a villian, he wasn't to the same level of evil as John Paul...that guy a zero redeeming qualities.

Some of the characters were typically stereotypical- the greedy corporate lawyer played by Matthew Modine and I never really understood 'Chloe's' Business partner 'Catherine', she seemed pretty irrelevant to the storyline.

I did like most of the twists and turns, never real sure 'who done it', so overall it kept it interesting.

Conservatively speaking I've probably seen more than a hundred criminal trials on screen. In about 90% of them a very big deal is made about keeping the defendant off the witness stand. In the other 10%, the defendant is begging against the defense attorney's wishes to be put on the stand. Sometimes when the defendant is the star and requires a star turn on the stand, they get their wish, but usually they don't. In this one the defendant suddenly appears on the stand. We don't know who called him there, but it's too early in the trial for it to have been the defense attorney...plus it's completely against the defense strategy. Plus there's evidence that's sprung on him that does not abide by the rules of evidence disclosure. It is a screamingly fraudulent scene for anyone remotely knowledgeable about criminal law, even if that knowledge only comes from the movies and TV. It completely undermines the story and the good work of Biel and Banks. Worst of all, it shows total contempt for the viewer. Turned it off after that.

Jessica Biel and Elizabeth Banks as sisters - it just works. The casting clicks immediately: familiar faces, magnetic in different ways, grounded enough to feel real but polished enough to keep your eyes glued. From the start, there's tension, that quiet kind that hums under every line. The show doesn't rush. It unspools slowly, feeding you just enough to stay hooked, each clue another tug on the line. And Biel? She's a force. Strong, lean, commanding in every frame. The camera knows it, too - it lingers, those sleeveless shirts doing half the storytelling.

But then comes the final episode. The rhythm stutters. That careful pacing, the mystery, the restraint - it all gives way to a clumsy data dump. Answers come too fast, too neat, and you're left wondering how something so taut unraveled so suddenly.