Bookish
- Serie de TV
- 2025–
Gabriel Book, propietario de una librería anticuaria, resuelve misterios con su colección de libros. Guía y protege a personas con problemas.Gabriel Book, propietario de una librería anticuaria, resuelve misterios con su colección de libros. Guía y protege a personas con problemas.Gabriel Book, propietario de una librería anticuaria, resuelve misterios con su colección de libros. Guía y protege a personas con problemas.
Explorar episodios
Opiniones destacadas
I wanted to watch that series because of Gatiss as a Sherlock and Doctor Who fan.
But after 2 first episodes I'm bored and disappointed. Sucha a pity. Nice idea of a bookworm solving crimes in post war London.
Firstly the main character is a boring show off. His is constantly acting like "Look at me, I'm a genius". He likes to be in the center of the attention, not carrying about the others.
His wife is acting like some kind of overacting actress from the theatre. There's completely no chemistry between them. Like they just friends, pretending that they are in love, cos he's gay?
And what with that lisping girl from the neighbourhood, acting like 15 years old?!
She's grown up and acting like a schoolgirl.
Jack is completely bland and the series would be OK without him, he adds nothing in the script.
Ok, now the mistery. We have a few red herrings and of course a murderer is a person, which is showed earlier. People with strong motives are innocent like always. Murderer is punished.
But why they wasted 2 whole episodes to solve such an easy mistery?! Why not 1 episode with less dialogues?!
Little less conversation, a little more action! Like Elvis once said.
Believe me, they're better series that that one.
Now you can hate me, I don't care. That's my opinion, and I will keep it.
But after 2 first episodes I'm bored and disappointed. Sucha a pity. Nice idea of a bookworm solving crimes in post war London.
Firstly the main character is a boring show off. His is constantly acting like "Look at me, I'm a genius". He likes to be in the center of the attention, not carrying about the others.
His wife is acting like some kind of overacting actress from the theatre. There's completely no chemistry between them. Like they just friends, pretending that they are in love, cos he's gay?
And what with that lisping girl from the neighbourhood, acting like 15 years old?!
She's grown up and acting like a schoolgirl.
Jack is completely bland and the series would be OK without him, he adds nothing in the script.
Ok, now the mistery. We have a few red herrings and of course a murderer is a person, which is showed earlier. People with strong motives are innocent like always. Murderer is punished.
But why they wasted 2 whole episodes to solve such an easy mistery?! Why not 1 episode with less dialogues?!
Little less conversation, a little more action! Like Elvis once said.
Believe me, they're better series that that one.
Now you can hate me, I don't care. That's my opinion, and I will keep it.
Having watched all six episodes in the first series I can vouch for its high entertainment value, but it requires a degree of wit and patience to keep on board with the intricate plotting. Mark Gatiss's script is witty, full of mischievous allusions and cryptic jokes, but this element is counterbalanced by the human story of Jack's relation to Gabriel Book, a story which will no doubt be further explored in the already commissioned second series. It is imaginatively filmed, well acted and strong on atmosphere. Nine stars out of ten because there were a few occasions when I found it difficult to make out what the actors were saying to each other.
I find very climactic the already well-known British device of presenting the episodes with an initial sequence apparently not related to the main timeline, but whose relevance will later be revealed (see Vera, Endeavour and many etcs.) This is, to me, the 'antipasto' for a most palatable 'crime dinnertime'.
I warn against the not-very-realistic reviews of people who don't even deign themselves to watch a full first episode and, based on a few minutes of hasty viewing, mark poorly a whole season or the show altogether. If you will take the time and trouble to write a review, at least take the time and trouble to see the whole season first. Otherwise, what worth is there in assessing something you haven't actually watched?
For those who have really watched Bookish, the experience seems to have been delightful. And Mark Gatiss plus Polly Walker, what a fantastic cast. A crowd-pleaser of course, but always delivering!
I liked the atmosphere, the bookish thing in itself, the character development and the 'magnetic' traction of the show, which drew myself in from the very beginning. So what else can I do other than recommend it, especially for those lovers of British crime series.
I warn against the not-very-realistic reviews of people who don't even deign themselves to watch a full first episode and, based on a few minutes of hasty viewing, mark poorly a whole season or the show altogether. If you will take the time and trouble to write a review, at least take the time and trouble to see the whole season first. Otherwise, what worth is there in assessing something you haven't actually watched?
For those who have really watched Bookish, the experience seems to have been delightful. And Mark Gatiss plus Polly Walker, what a fantastic cast. A crowd-pleaser of course, but always delivering!
I liked the atmosphere, the bookish thing in itself, the character development and the 'magnetic' traction of the show, which drew myself in from the very beginning. So what else can I do other than recommend it, especially for those lovers of British crime series.
I really enjoyed the first two episodes, or rather the first case. First, we learn about the bookstore and the area, as well as the main characters. The pacing is well-chosen; above all, you can enjoy the series, and the locations are very interesting. I really enjoyed the whole case. I especially loved the flashbacks, as they reminded me of Agatha Christie's films. The resolution wasn't predictable for me, and there were a few twists and turns. The camera work was okay and I also liked the editing. The character development was very good, especially for some of the main characters. I give it 9 out of 10, and I'm looking forward to the second case.
Mark Gattis always writes interestingly different stories and his performances are very truthful. This is quite an interesting and unusual series. The London portrayed doesn't quite look like any London that I know on deeper examination It isn't London at all.
Possibly because of economy the production decided to shoot the series in Belgium. Very sad that a quintessential English series is filmed in a foreign country. The streets the buildings the supporting artists all look wrong. I hated the filming.
The lighting was incredibly harsh. I don't know whether this was trying replicate old-fashioned lighting but it certainly didn't work. None of the actors looked at all their best. But well done Mark for bringing us an intriguing series full of humanity.
Possibly because of economy the production decided to shoot the series in Belgium. Very sad that a quintessential English series is filmed in a foreign country. The streets the buildings the supporting artists all look wrong. I hated the filming.
The lighting was incredibly harsh. I don't know whether this was trying replicate old-fashioned lighting but it certainly didn't work. None of the actors looked at all their best. But well done Mark for bringing us an intriguing series full of humanity.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaAlthough set in London, it's mostly filmed in Belgium.
- ErroresThe London taxis are FX3, which were not produced until 1948 - 2 years on from the setting of the series.
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta