Opiniones de usuarios

Too repetitive. We have a narrator, architects, and archaeologists who repeat what someone else has just explained, and this fillers happen over and over again. When it comes to adding mysteries revealed, each chapter would last 15 minutes, everything else is filled with images, often the same image, to explain over and over again the analytical capacity of digital scanning technology. Of interest is how fragile the drones used to take images look. These drones didn't make the tunnel diagrams, which is what Ground Penetrating Radar does, but it's not presented compared to the time consumed by photogrammetry advertisements. The data obtained by researchers are not heard and much less discussed or lost among comments and opinions that do not reveal or advance in any way the multiple questions presented as if as a riddle. The mysteries to be revealed became questions after the translation. New research and access to important places are presented but superficially mentioned before moving on to another round of unresolved questions and speculations. They have a good show assembled, but they must polish the presentation avoiding repeating information and unresolved questions. I do understand that they are valid questions with a lot of reasoning, but if I wanted questions, I would be in front of a math book, not in front of a television.