CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
6.1/10
1.6 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Agrega una trama en tu idiomaIn 605 B.C., Jerusalem was conquered by Babylonians, capturing many young men, including Daniel. Daniel served as Nebuchadnezzar's powerful king, demonstrating boldness and faithfulness to G... Leer todoIn 605 B.C., Jerusalem was conquered by Babylonians, capturing many young men, including Daniel. Daniel served as Nebuchadnezzar's powerful king, demonstrating boldness and faithfulness to God.In 605 B.C., Jerusalem was conquered by Babylonians, capturing many young men, including Daniel. Daniel served as Nebuchadnezzar's powerful king, demonstrating boldness and faithfulness to God.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
William Matthews
- Hootan
- (as Matthew Tailford)
Francesco Curá
- Darius's Soldier
- (as Francis J. Cura)
Gallagher
- Astrologer-Abib
- (as Leo Gallagher)
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
This account of the life of Daniel traces his encounters in Babylon with 4 Kings. Nebuchadnezzar the Great, Belshazzar the Foolish, Darius the Deceived and Cyrus the Shepherd. It is faithful to scripture and gives insight into the prophecies of Jeremiah and Isaiah as well as words on the lips of Daniel from the Psalms, especially in the Lion's den. Daniel gives us a great model and inspiration to how to live wisely and well in a secular society. His tact, respect and patience are good examples for those who serve in public office. Worth watching at any age and then to dig into the scriptures for the latter chapters of Daniel 7-12 which are not covered in this film.
If it wasn't for Rolf Saxon, i wouldn't have gotten the DVD for it. I'm not a biblical enthusiast or even knowledgeable about Daniel and his story as a prophet. The cast is first rate with Rolf Saxon as King Nebud; Lance Hendricksen as Cyrus; Leo Gallagher as the astrologer and other actors. The film was directed by a woman, rare these days. She seems knowledgeable about her subject and the film. First, there is a lot of dialogue on par with a Shakespearean drama. If you're not into biblical movies, you may not appreciate it as much. I enjoyed the features especially the bloopers and behind the scenes as well.
First I will let you know that I'm a Christian, but I'm also a huge movie fan and in my opinion most Christian movies are not that good.
The Book of Daniel isn't perfect, but I feel it is well acted, fairly well written and stays true to the story.
While there are no real special effects and it is a low budget movie, that doesn't make it bad.
Daniel is a person in the Bible that really hasn't had too many turns on the small or big screen, and this is a pretty decent attempt at telling his story and God's story of love for all people.
If you go into this movie with an open mind, instead of rejecting it because it is a Biblical movie, you may enjoy it.
The Book of Daniel isn't perfect, but I feel it is well acted, fairly well written and stays true to the story.
While there are no real special effects and it is a low budget movie, that doesn't make it bad.
Daniel is a person in the Bible that really hasn't had too many turns on the small or big screen, and this is a pretty decent attempt at telling his story and God's story of love for all people.
If you go into this movie with an open mind, instead of rejecting it because it is a Biblical movie, you may enjoy it.
A superb retelling on the life of Daniel. Considering the budget/restrictions making a low budget film, this movie shines. Excellent acting from Robert Miano, Lance Henrickson and Andrew Bongiorno carry the piece. First time director Zelinski does a good job.The writing is rock solid and very impressive. When you consider this piece, think about the garbage Hollywood spews forth today. Expensive with pretty pictures and ugly stories. This is the complete opposite. I wish Hollywood would go back to making movies rather than political propaganda films. I want to be moved emotionally when I go to see a movie. I want to laugh or cry or remember, not be indoctrinated. this movie reminded me of what a film can be. I highly recommend it.
Ignore the negative reviews. This is very accurate and a true account of the book of Daniel. It has not been ruined by terrible cgi or acting. It is well made and focusing on the facts and the prophecies. HIGHLY Recommended. It has no unnecessary special effects, no added. Acting is good, with some famous actors. content and no over the top scenes. If you want the real story, watch this film. It even has bishops from aliens playing Cyrus! Props are well made and accurate too as are costumes. Feels like a documentary and film in one. It covers Daniels whole life span. It was really good how the prophecies were told too, especially the one about the statue with a head of gold (babylon), shoulders of silver (medes and Persians), chest of bronze (greece), legs of iron (roman) and feet of iron and clay (today). Watch it.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaAnna Zielinski's directorial debut.
- ErroresKing Nebuchadnezzar orders a golden statue of himself 90 feet high. The statue in the film however, is not Nebuchadnezzar, but 4th Century Christian Bishop Saint Nicholas of Myra, as evidenced by the fact that he is wearing the vestments of a bishop, carries a shepherd's crozier and carries a book and 3 apples (or 3 lumps of gold). The statue also also expresses the hand gesture of a priestly blessing.
- Créditos curiososAt the end of the credits it says "The persons and events in this motion picture are fictitious. Any similarities to actual persons or events is unintentional"
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is The Book of Daniel?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- Tiên Tri Daniel
- Locaciones de filmación
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 30 minutos
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta