Un grupo de estudiantes viaja al infame bosque de Camp Blood con la esperanza de desmentir una leyenda local.Un grupo de estudiantes viaja al infame bosque de Camp Blood con la esperanza de desmentir una leyenda local.Un grupo de estudiantes viaja al infame bosque de Camp Blood con la esperanza de desmentir una leyenda local.
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Elenco
Sarah Ryan
- Sasha
- (as Sarah Elizabeth)
Ken Van Sant
- Sheriff
- (as Ken Vansant)
Elizabeth V. Costanzo
- Brianna
- (as Elizabeth Costanzo)
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
This movie is hilariously low budget but made me laugh because it was so. I worked on a jigsaw puzzle while watching it so I don't feel I wasted the time. The one person's breathing pattern alone in this movie is worth watching it for, that is not a spoiler in anyway.
This is the definition of what not to watch ,
Enough said if you have seen these cheap 400 dollar budget sequels. You get what I'm saying this one is particularly bad !
This movie is pure garbage the acting is bad the effects are bad. The whole freaking movie is just terrible.
First of all, I like to give snaps to any company who wants to produce their own movies. I, too, have this same vision of writing and producing my own Indie films. With that being said . . .
When I first saw the title of this movie, I instantly thought "Friday the 13th" type film. Which, in a sense, was a "Friday" type film. Cliché killer at some camp -which you never actually see, only the name- who kills some unsuspecting teenagers who were doing something stupid around said "camp"
I'm sure the makers of this film wanted to go for the WOW factor with their CG effects, but I wasn't impressed. Especially with some low budget film like this, you're looking for those low budget, cheap stage effects. Oh no, they tried to go all the way on this one and it just ended up looking stupid.
The acting was unconvincing. Which must be a requirement for low budget movies. The actors don't speak over what appears to be a stage whisper -turning my TV up to 55 and still can't understand them-. And the delivery of the dialogue was, as expected from a low budget film, slow and choppy; as if they were reading their lines off cue cards.
The camera work was very shaky. For instance, they did have the POV of the killer, but it got to the point where you didn't know if you were looking through the killers eyes, one of the kid's "home video" POV, or if it was just the cameraman doing a regular shot. It just added to the "hey, this is a low budget movie and we are going to make sure we do everything we can to remind you of that." And actually, most video editing software has an anti-shake feature that reduces the amount of shaky camera work.
So all in all, the positive is that some Indie company done their thing and made -apparently- a series of these movies. The negative is, well, it kind of looks like a junior high media arts project.
When I first saw the title of this movie, I instantly thought "Friday the 13th" type film. Which, in a sense, was a "Friday" type film. Cliché killer at some camp -which you never actually see, only the name- who kills some unsuspecting teenagers who were doing something stupid around said "camp"
I'm sure the makers of this film wanted to go for the WOW factor with their CG effects, but I wasn't impressed. Especially with some low budget film like this, you're looking for those low budget, cheap stage effects. Oh no, they tried to go all the way on this one and it just ended up looking stupid.
The acting was unconvincing. Which must be a requirement for low budget movies. The actors don't speak over what appears to be a stage whisper -turning my TV up to 55 and still can't understand them-. And the delivery of the dialogue was, as expected from a low budget film, slow and choppy; as if they were reading their lines off cue cards.
The camera work was very shaky. For instance, they did have the POV of the killer, but it got to the point where you didn't know if you were looking through the killers eyes, one of the kid's "home video" POV, or if it was just the cameraman doing a regular shot. It just added to the "hey, this is a low budget movie and we are going to make sure we do everything we can to remind you of that." And actually, most video editing software has an anti-shake feature that reduces the amount of shaky camera work.
So all in all, the positive is that some Indie company done their thing and made -apparently- a series of these movies. The negative is, well, it kind of looks like a junior high media arts project.
I am officially 13:22 into the third installment of the Camp Blood series. The first one, I believe to be a classic cheese fest and I have a soft spot in my heart for it. The second had me tuning out and doing other tasks every once and awhile.
This one! This one! Like i stated, I'm less than half way through and I don't know if I can finish it. The thing that kills it for me, is it the story? Nope. Is it the slasher film clichés? Nope, those never get old. Well, what is it then? It's the CGI!
CGI does not belong in the slasher genre! I need an entire site to express my feelings on this. I've seen many horror films that use CG gore and believe me when I say I hate them all, but this, this is a new low. At least, maybe, I don't know, try!
When attempting to make a low rent slasher film the acting is expected to be awful, the story is expected to be cliché but for Christ sakes, can we at least still have the practical effects? For us lovers of the genre, please stop! I can put up with an awful flick as long as the gore looks like there was some thought put into it.
Whoever made this is an a**hole and is doing a huge disservice to the genre. Sure am glad I didn't pay for, if I did the director may have gotten a letter bomb!
This one! This one! Like i stated, I'm less than half way through and I don't know if I can finish it. The thing that kills it for me, is it the story? Nope. Is it the slasher film clichés? Nope, those never get old. Well, what is it then? It's the CGI!
CGI does not belong in the slasher genre! I need an entire site to express my feelings on this. I've seen many horror films that use CG gore and believe me when I say I hate them all, but this, this is a new low. At least, maybe, I don't know, try!
When attempting to make a low rent slasher film the acting is expected to be awful, the story is expected to be cliché but for Christ sakes, can we at least still have the practical effects? For us lovers of the genre, please stop! I can put up with an awful flick as long as the gore looks like there was some thought put into it.
Whoever made this is an a**hole and is doing a huge disservice to the genre. Sure am glad I didn't pay for, if I did the director may have gotten a letter bomb!
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaThe third entry in the Camp Blood series, replacing the unofficial film Within the Woods (2005).
- ErroresThe Killer is significantly larger in size than the character revealed to be the murderer. They also do not share the same eye color, as seen in close ups of the killer and the respective character.
- ConexionesFollowed by Camp Blood 666 (2016)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 12 minutos
- Color
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
By what name was Camp Blood First Slaughter (2014) officially released in India in English?
Responda