Opiniones de usuarios

I've been a fan of The Count of Monte Cristo since reading the book years ago, but I've struggled to find an adaptation that truly worked for me.

The films are too short to do the story justice, and while the popular 1998 French-Italian miniseries had its charm, it feels a bit dated now and takes some liberties with the plot.

I was actually anticipating the new 2024 French film adaptation when this English TV series appeared out of nowhere (though it is still a French-Italian production).

This series is the best adaptation I've seen so far. After watching it, I can confidently say I'm less excited about the film (although three hours long, it probably still not long enough to include all story elements).

It's been a long time since I read the book and I don't remember every detail, but the series seems faithful to the story and the eight episodes give the plot room to develop. It simplifies some secondary character and story arcs, but overall, it covers much of the novel.

My only critique is that the middle episodes did get a bit convoluted, and I sometimes struggled to keep track of the three families. (To be fair, I'm terrible with names, which didn't help.)

Regardless, I highly recommend this series, whether or not you're a fan of the book. My wife, who hasn't read it, loved the series just as much-and even asked to keep watching, which is rare for her.

I have seen less than 50 percent of Bille August work and never liked any of his movies, actually most of it made me wanna puke and think he is totally overrated. Mediocre movies that I feel are so poorly made but this one is just amazing.

Maybe it is because this Story is just so amazing, that his talent finally come to show. But this is the best version of the The count of Monte Christo I have ever seen.

Great acting, great flow in the story, cinematic experience was superb felt like a historical experience and the audio was amazing.

Our family, old and young, was glued to the screen for two days.

The only minus was the pretentious birth name of his daughter who had a minor role in the movie which she did, ok. So we withdraw the tenth star.

Based in UK desparate to watch and lucky enough to watch on STV.

A beautiful mini series based on Alexander dumas novel. Stunning locations, architecture, music, art and most of all superb acting and directing.

Sam Claflin as Edmund/the count was absolutely hypnotic. Close up camera work on his eyes showed the pain, anger and loss of the character. Episode with Abe Faria (Jeremy Iron) was enthralling don't know where time went.

Actors playing Danglars, Vampa, Caderousse and Jacapo gave humour which I enjoyed too!

The villains of the piece played magnificently too.

A show not to be missed. I'm on my 3rd time round😁

I'm extremely happy with how this series was made. Not only have they found a way to make it realistic, but they've also found a way to make the story so precise that it could have easily happened in reality. One of the few adaptations I can say is wonderful. The cast and locations are breathtaking in their authenticity.

I appreciate the fact that they changed the story just enough to make it more feasible, as compared to random. The issue with the original was always there were too many things that had to align just right for it to work. That's not the case with this series, they made it very believable.

!0/10 well done, truly fantastic work.

This series is outstanding in every respect. Certainly, one of the best adaptations of Dumas' book that I have seen in my 61 years. The fact that it's an 8-part miniseries gives the production time to properly flesh out the characters and various plot strands.

Sam Claflin leads a top-notch cast (special mention for Michele Riondino, as Jacopo, and Blake Ritson, who is wonderfully evil in everything!), and the script is excellent.

Some wonderful locations and beautiful cinematography, along with excellent original music, by Volker. Bertelmann) complete what is an epic production.

I only hope it goes on to be seen by a wide audience, as it truly deserves to be seen!

I can honestly say, that I didn't miss a second of this fantastic version of the classic tale. The cast, the direction, the locations... all of it is perfect. Nothing less. I binged it all through christmas day and now I don't know what to watch next! It's that kind of adaptation. It's that good. It's worth a second watch, and thats what I will do. Watch it again :-) If you have the chance to stream it where you live, make yourself a good cup of coffe, sit back and enjoy the story of revenge, greed, ambitions, love, hate and all that lies in between. I really recommend that you do, and remember to enjoy the caracter of Dantes/ the Count. He is so brilliantly portraied as a man with complete control of his face and his emotions.

One of the truer adaptations I've had a chance to watch. While it kept my attention due to familiarity with the source material, it was not without disappointments. The minor changes to character arcs or plot points are forgivable (Vampa, Valentine, the "midwife"). I can even forgive the rather considerable changes to Caderousse's character... I was undeniably impressed that a small detail such as the velvet purse made it into the screenplay.

A couple more positives: the sets, locations, and costumes were stunning. You truly felt transported to an era of silken extravagance. These painted a very sharp contrast against the barrenness and rocky depths of the Chateau d'If and the island of Monte Cristo.

However, what it lacked was reasonable human emotion from almost every actor. I find it hard to believe that such a talented cast struggled to muster realistic reactions in some of the situations they found themselves. (Hermine was likely the most emotive.) At key moments, when you'd expect ANY emotion but bland acceptance, the opportunities were completely avoided. For instance, while Edmond was being transported to the Chateau d'If, and all the way to his cell, he went without hesitation or resistance: what innocent person would willingly be transported to a notorious hellhole if they knew they were innocent? By contrast, in the book, he found out where he was going, made a break for it and had to be forcibly restrained at gunpoint. The "cold and calculating" Count shone through no problem, but the moments of despair, and of humanity and empathy that could have drawn the audience in were sorely lacking. His character's moments of redemption from the book (such as revealing himself to Maximilien) were sadly not part of the final release which was a huge disappointment.

I found the soundtrack distracting at times and at the same time, found myself wishing it could have added more emphasis to whatever scene it supported.

Similarly, while the locations were stunning, I was disappointed in the cinematography. Overall, I found it sterile and static. Some well thought out continuous shots might served well to draw the viewer into the action directly.

In summary, worth watching, but don't get your hopes up too high with the acting or expecting characters that grow in depth over time.

For those old enough to have witnessed the Alan Bardel 1964 version, glued to their flickering TV screens, transfixed by the gothic horror and grime, this one was going to be a hard act to follow. To film this, in a modern age, with all the demands of hi-res, colour and costumes was a very brave attempt, and for that I genuinely applaud the effort......... however, it could have been done a WHOLE LOT better, which probably suggests that even with all the EU tax breaks (and other backhanders) there simply were not enough Euros in the chest to really give justice to the Dumas classic. The UK actor Sam Claflin, as Edmond Dantes had screen presence, but arguably not enough ruggedness to really carry the role, in comparison with a persona of Jeremy Iron's gravitas (cellmate Abbe Faria). One big gripe was about the buried treasure. The chests, after having lain for 300 years would have been infested with guano, cobwebs and bat feces, if not totally decimated by Time, but looked like something recently bought on E-bay. Bad move, my continuity guys! Despite all - I'm watching to the end, and I will do my hardest to enjoy it!

By far the best adaptation of Monte C and closest to the book. Compared to French version this one is superior. Almost 90% is true to the book, the rest is light modifications, some good, some not very smart... Lacks the intensity of the stories in the book. Maybe one or two more episodes would give time develop all characters correctly!

Everything was covered, a lot of details, good cinematography, but a lot is left unsaid... Few characters were merged, and used poorly, but I gave it a high rating, because other adaptations did not even try to follow the book.

Solid adaptation of a great book!

Great adaptation.

After the movie, my hopes for an adaptation that tried to be faithful to the book were very low, but this series really made an effort, and it turned out well. Dantès is serious, not as charismatic as in the books, but at least he's not disfigured into an angry caricature of himself. Sam Claflin did a great job. It was interesting from start to finish, and I devoured it. They did justice to Eugénie Danglars and Valentina Villefort.

The movie lacked some of the oriental mystique present in the book, but I preferred this over a poor attempt at capturing it.

I will definitely watch it again, and I highly recommend it to everyone-both book lovers and movie fans.

Thank you for making such a good series.

This is one of the greatest of revenge tales. Even Lew Wallace borrowed from "The Count of Monte Cristo" when he wrote "Ben-Hur" around 40 years after "Monte Cristo" was first published.

A few reviewers on here take issue with how this veers off from the book and don't give it a high rating for that reason. Every adaptation of "Monte Cristo" veers off from the book. That has to happen because the multi-faceted revenge story is complex and wasn't meant to be watched, just read. This veers off in ways that enhance the theme of this story.

This series is a great watch. We couldn't stop. We wanted to know what he was going to do next. And because there was so much irony, many scenes were surprisingly funny as Dantes' victims fell into his web.

Sam Claflin was detached, pained, clever, single-minded and charismatic, credibly portraying everything that Dantes needed to be to pull off his revenge.

As someone who grew up reading The Count of Monte Cristo, I was thrilled to see how this mini-series reimagines the timeless story in such a compelling and modern way. It captures the essence of the original-revenge, justice, and redemption-while weaving in fresh twists that keep you hooked from start to finish.

The writing is sharp, the pacing is excellent, and the characters are brought to life with stellar performances. You can feel the emotional weight behind every decision and betrayal, and the storytelling does justice to the complexities of the original work.

Visually, it's stunning, with detailed cinematography and immersive settings that draw you into the world. The creators have managed to make the series both entertaining and thought-provoking, which is no small feat.

Whether you're a fan of the novel or completely new to the story, this mini-series is a must-watch. It's a masterful adaptation that reminds us why this tale has stood the test of time. Highly recommended!

I've seen many adaptations of this particular book by Alexandre Dumas. And in my opinion this one is by far the best. I read the book and loved it a lot. This is captivating story and an epic revange tale. And this tv mini series did the book justice. The way Count placed his ponds and stroke when his enemies least expected - pure genius. And this adaptation perfectly sees it through. Sam Claflin did amazing job as Edmond / the count. There are some differences from the book, or characters missing, but nothing major. And to be fully honest, I think I like this enging better than the one in the book. Will I watch it again? For sure. If you ever find yourself in a need of a revange - do it Montecristo style.

I was hooked from the very first episode. The Jim Caviezel movie was extremely well done, but this series exceeds that masterpiece. With more time, you are able to weave more layers into this tale that requires it. The acting is almost all top shelf with a couple performances that are mediocre. The series has a solid pace and builds until episode 6. I found Episodes 7 and 8 drawn out and less than engaging. Sure, you get the ending you expect, but the magic was gone. A couple reveals in this series were far superior to the movie and a few were fer less impressive.

I 100% recommend you see this but also caution you that despite landing safely, they didn't stick it in my opinion.

In a landscape filled with adaptations that often only capture a shadow of their source material, "The Count of Monte Cristo" miniseries arrives as a resounding triumph-a television event that not only honors but elevates its origins. This isn't just another version of Alexandre Dumas's story; it is, without a doubt, the definitive adaptation for our generation and one of the best I have ever had the pleasure of watching. A flawless masterpiece that deserves every second of your attention and the highest possible rating.

At the heart of this magnificent production lies the performance of a lifetime from Sam Claflin, who delivers an unforgettable Edmond Dantès/Count of Monte Cristo. His portrayal is, without exaggeration, hypnotic and masterful. We watch with bated breath as he transitions from the naive young sailor, his eyes brimming with hope, to the cold, calculating, and relentless Count, whose pain and thirst for revenge burn behind a facade of charisma and absolute control. The camera masterfully captures every micro-expression, revealing the layers of a man remade by tragedy and knowledge.

The brilliantly crafted screenplay achieves the rare feat of being extremely faithful to the soul of the book. The eight-episode miniseries format was the perfect choice, allowing the complex plot to unfold with the necessary pace and depth. Essential characters like Maximilien Morrel, Valentine de Villefort, and even the bandit Luigi Vampa-so often cut from other versions-are given their due prominence here, enriching the narrative and showing a profound respect for Dumas's work. The few changes made only serve to enhance the story's cohesion, making it even more believable and impactful on screen.

Visually, the series is a cinematic spectacle. Every scene is a painting, with stunning cinematography, authentic costumes, and spectacular locations that transport us directly to 19th-century France. From the desolation of the Château d'If to the opulence of Parisian salons, every detail is meticulously crafted, creating an immersive experience and a true feast for the eyes. The original score perfectly complements the atmosphere, intensifying every moment of tension and drama.

The supporting cast is equally brilliant. Jeremy Irons delivers a wise and captivating Abbé Faria, and his chemistry with Claflin makes their time in prison one of the series' high points. The villains are magnificently portrayed, with a palpable evil that makes the Count's revenge all the more satisfying. Characters like Jacopo and the series' version of Caderousse bring humor and humanity, balancing the story's tone.

"The Count of Monte Cristo" is television at its finest. It is a series that captivates from the first second to the last-an epic journey of betrayal, redemption, and one of the most well-orchestrated vengeances in literature. In the end, the feeling is not just one of satisfaction, but of gratitude for the creation of such a powerful and respectful adaptation. For fans of the book and newcomers alike, this is a must-watch experience and the perfect justification for a 10/10 rating. Simply marvelous.

Out of ALL of the versions of this wonderful tale of abstract revenge; this series happens to be the most wonderful of all. Although it lacks the action of the predecessors, it is the CLOSEST adaptation to the novel. This series encompasses the majority of the book and in such, it should be deemed as a must watch be any and everyone that loves this novel. This adaptation shows all aspects of the angst of the protagonist. In Edmond Dantes, you can see that he struggles with doing what his heart desires as revenge but nonetheless he goes forward even in his one on one interactions with Mercedes, he still goes forward. Dumas would have LOVED this rendition.

Although the series starts off strong with beautiful locations and cinematography, it quickly devolves into a shallow and often completely inaccurate portrayal of this great novel. Most of the key characters are reduced to mere shadows of their book counterparts. Haydée, Caderousse, Mercedes, and Danglars character development and arcs are completely butchered.

The finale feels like a blatant disrespect to the source material. Not only does it exclude most of the characters' growth, but some scenes even suggest the exact opposite of the themes and conclusions Dumas so carefully crafted and led us through. Redemption, justice, punishment, and especially the Count's final battle with his conscience, are all replaced with an implied Hollywood happy ending.

It's disappointing to see another watered-down, flashy Hollywood version of this great book.

I've seen more than one interpretation of this work and found this one particularly captivating and very well done. The production quality is top of the line and even the musical score (including opera selections) are all original. So new and fresh is the score that not even Shazam can identify any of it.

The cast though somewhat unknown to a North American viewer were all excellent and believable. Like a new version of a Shakespeare play, this new treatment of the Dumas classic offers the viewer that rare original work by which all others will become measured.

I'm constantly frustrated at the limited access in North America to the fabulous quality of European entertainment. This series has apparently only aired in Italy, Switzerland, and Sweden. I seriously hope some North American network or service picks it up for viewing. If you can find it, watch it and enjoy.

Le Comte de Monte-Cristo (2024) delivers a breathtaking and fresh adaptation of Alexandre Dumas' classic novel, elevating the tale of betrayal, revenge, and redemption to new heights. Directed by Bille August, this miniseries spans eight episodes, offering a detailed and emotional exploration of the iconic story. The series follows Edmond Dantès (portrayed by Sam Claflin), a sailor wrongfully imprisoned for a crime he didn't commit. His transformation into the enigmatic and vengeful Count of Monte-Cristo is depicted with intensity and depth. The narrative does justice to Dumas' intricate plot, weaving themes of justice, morality, and human resilience into a modern cinematic experience.

The extended episodic format allows for a deeper dive into the characters' motivations and relationships. Mercédès (Ana Girardot) and Abbé Faria (Jeremy Irons) are given layered portrayals, enriching the emotional stakes of the story.

The episodes with Ali Pasha should have been added to the series. One of the most important contributions to Edmond's character development in the book and the most important points was the period of slavery. In addition, there are not many fictional events in the series, and everything has been done to stay true to the book. The actors have adapted very well to the characters. The actor who played the character Edmond, in particular, portrayed his coldness, insensitivity and style of speaking very well when he returned for revenge, as in the book. Despite this, I can say that the series was the best adaptation of the book so far. It was both a visual feast and a pleasure to watch.

Television at its finest! I have seen just about every decent series known to mankind in the English language. However, I am absolutely shocked at how good this show is. I mean, it has everything. The acting is by far absolutely top notch, the storyline is amazin. They took old and used story, put a spin on it, and turned out a masterpiece. It might be the best show I've ever seen and I would definitely put it in my top 10 all-time favorites. It's just so fun! There's not dull moment in this series . Please don't listen to the negative reviews and check this one out for yourself. I promise it does not disappoint!

The Count of Monte Cristo (2002), starring Jim Caviezel and Guy Pearce, is a thrilling adaptation of Alexandre Dumas' classic novel. Sam Claflin, in a supporting role, plays a young version of the character Albert de Morcerf. While his role is relatively small compared to the lead characters, Claflin's performance stands out as he brings youthful energy and charm to his role.

The story follows Edmond Dantès, a man who is wrongfully imprisoned and seeks revenge against those who betrayed him. The themes of betrayal, revenge, and redemption are explored deeply throughout the film, with Dantès' transformation from an innocent man to a complex figure determined by vengeance.

Claflin's portrayal of Albert is essential for the character's role in the story, providing a contrast to the dark, intense path that Dantès follows. While he's not the central figure, Claflin's performance adds nuance to the film's exploration of relationships and loyalty.

The film, directed by Kevin Reynolds, does a great job of combining action with emotional depth. The visuals and historical setting are stunning, and the action sequences are engaging without overshadowing the central plot. The performances of Caviezel and Pearce, along with Claflin's contribution, help bring this classic story to life.

If you're a fan of historical dramas, action, or revenge stories, The Count of Monte Cristo is a must-watch. While Claflin's role is not the main focus, his involvement in this strong ensemble cast makes it an even more enjoyable experience.

The first episode wasn't great but it was good enough to convince me to go on with the series, and I'm glad I did.

Clafin was bland as a young sailor, but managed to look suitably deranged when imprisoned in the Chateau d'If and was quite believable as the Count.

Overall acting is above average; I especially liked Irons as Faria, but Barnett as Caderousse and Riondino as Jacopo were nice surprises.

Cinematography is excellent, with several scenes looking like paintings; some candle-lit interiors brought Rembrandt to mind. Costumes and scenery are a feast for the eyes.

Dumas' story was stretched but not broken; several characters were omitted for clarity, brevity and for budget, but what remains is a plot that closely follows the original and - while remaining intricate - doesn't have gaping holes.

I didn't like Girardot's wooden portrayal of Mercedes, the annoying incidental music and the overuse of flashbacks (even if I understand that some viewers could get lost in the plot and the flashbacks provided some much needed explanation).