Opiniones de usuarios

The movie is low budget, the writing is shoddy and the acting is okay. It's nothing special. I tried very hard to watch this movie. I read the reviews that were very positive and took a chance on it and really regretted my decision to watch it.

It has a lot of promise, the sound effects were spot on, the B roll was excellent but the movie really disappoints in the A roll, the acting and the editing. I became really frustrated with the way the A roll was shot for this movie. In the first 10 minutes of the movie they don't consider framing to be important, so things that need to be wide angled are shot closely and things that are shot closely are wide angled. It makes no artistic or functional sense.

There's a dialogue scene in the first 10 minutes where the main character is speaking to another influential character and the acting is just....poor. There is no tension, there is no real emotion being shown, it's like they told the main actor to act conflicted and he took that to mean act as if he was constipated! The line delivery in that conversation was so poor, the timing so bad, I wonder if the person who cast these roles even cared!

Then there's the editing. Oh God, the editing. In that same conversation they switch the A roll (primary shots) between the two characters for every line they speak. For roughly 3 minutes you have the camera going right-left, left-right, back and forth for every....single....line of dialogue, without any transition, it's almost all straight cuts. They do use L and J cuts but sparingly. If you're epileptic and can be triggered, I'd avoid this movie at all costs.

I'll try to watch it again, because I've never felt the need to write such a negative review of a movie before. I want to be fair to the people who worked on this movie, but from my first watch, it was terrible.

Thankfully saw this on a pirated dvd n was able to fast forward some utterly boring scenes. Got enticed into seeing this awful film due to some misleading fake reviews n the trailer. What kinda vampire organizes ring fights? The ring fights were boring too. Our lead actor is bitten by hordes of vampires but i dont kno how n why he is healed miraculously n nursed by a stripper. Malcolm McDowell n Rutger Hauer is totally wasted. They must b bankrupt to take part in this awful film. Ther is no tension, ther is nothing scary in this film, the editing is awfully bad n the best was the ending man. The cross dresser vampire tells the other vampire to take revenge n kill the lead guy. I expected some showdown but hohoho.

I gave it a 3. I would have rated it higher but feldman is terrible. He brings no dimension to the part, almost like he was trying too hard.

Ohh my this was really bad. And not in a good way, but in the "I feel really sorry for these guys" cringe worthy kind of way.

I am not sure if it supposed to be a pilot for a possible tv show or what the deal was but as a standalone movie this does not work at all.

Maybe if they had a decent editor there might have been some sort of coherence to the story, but as it stands its a mess. Guess its supposed to be an origin story? The byline here at IMDB that describes the movie is the ending. Getting there is confusing and NOT AT ALL scary in the very least bit.

The main antagonist, Cory Feldman, as a cross dressing bloodthirsty john was probably supposed to be scary (?) but comes across as a sad sack of you know what. Its a spoof on Buffalo Bill from silence of the lambs, but where he came across as disturbed in a disconcerting manner, Feldman's Bill just feels sad. You simply cant help feeling sorry for him and his mediocre personage. Is this really the best they could do for a bad guy?

Ohhh yes there is another guy in the shadows somewhere but I guess they saved him for the series.

To summarize, its not scary. Its incoherent and its all been done and seen before, the main protagonist is as forgettable as they come and the main antagonist is sad and embarrassing.

I really wanted to like this.. But its just not worth seeing. The poster is OK though.

Not even Corey and his band of merry 'Angels' creating multiple accounts to increase the overall score, can prevent this one sinking to the depths of Razzie award territory.

There is absolutely no originality in this movie what-so-ever, so i can't understand why the 10 star reviews are rating it as some kind of original 'cult classic' ?? *sarcasm*

Cinematography and art design is good, but it's totally wasted in a complete mish mash blade knockoff / buffalo bill wannabe story and script. Seriously, I kid you not, the final scene is an EXACT rip off from Blade.

It's hard to judge the acting, because the script is so cringe worthy! eg 'I'm gonna kill em all' - 'This is a city of sinners' *BLEURGH* The only decent stand out performance for me was the latino girl. At the other end of the spectrum was Feldman, it was as if the director said ' Ok Corey, I want you to offend every transvestite in America, show me what you got '

.... NEXT

There is nothing good to say about this movie. This movie is about as good as Feldman's music. Take my word & don't waste your time or you'll never get it back.

My opinion "this is bad" from an interesting first ten minutes, with what seemed potential watchability , it went down hill and is still going. I have nothing good or constructive to say about this film. The unfortunate thing is to pass an opinion you have to watch it.

Awful does not start to tell you the let down. Where in the universe do these reviewers giving 9 and 10 come from? One even wrote "best movie of the year". You got to be kidding me!

I admit, the ploy is always the same: early on upon movie release, all these people show up with lots and lots of standard / non sensical praises extolling the worse movies. Technically, this trick is as old as online reviews: it fortunately should not fool anybody. Well, except me this time... I saw the IMDB average 6.something rating, thought why not? and went for it.

Well, that was a mistake: this movie was like a bad dream with nothing to redeem it. A bad movie with all the ingredients: the misfits vampires, the violent weirdos, a meh! vague story, a bout of MMA, lots of blood, a tiny touch of gothic atmosphere and above all, Ladies and Gentlemen, real baaaad acting. If you have 1:35 hour to waste, here is the occasion.

From the opening Monologue(sorry Malcolm) this movie is diabolical.Shaky Camera work and a script that has the feeling like it was written at a weekend at Bernie's after party.Corey Feldmans tragic role as a Vampire is a total train wreck and his copy cat style of Silence of the lambs Buffalo bill is just a joke and is a blatant last grasp of an Ex child actor trying to clutch onto something that they use to have in the 80s trans-phobia is also a part of this flick.SO a story that has been told a thousand times in every Vampire C Movie of the last 20 Years is what is on offer...Have a beer and watch Lost Boys instead

In New York, the skeptical rogue detective Corbin Nash (Dean S. Jagger) learns from a veteran cop (Rutger Hauer) and his mentor Jack (Bruce Davison) that his parents were demon hunters killed by demons. He moves to Los Angeles to investigate cases of missing persons with his partner Frank Sullivan (Chris Pardal) and they stumble upon the sadistic criminals Queeny (Corey Feldman) and Vince (Richard Wagner). Nash is abducted and tortured by the duo and other monsters and dumped on an alley considered dead. However the stripper Macy (Fernanda Romero) is guided by the mysterious Blind Prophet (Malcolm McDowell) and brings Nash home to treat him. But soon Nash dies and is reborn as a monstrous demon hunter and hunts down Queeny and Vince.

"Corbin Nash" is an action-horror film with a dark story in a gothic atmosphere. The demons are indeed sadistic vampires and the environment follows the style of "Seven", with gruesome dark locations. It is also a chance to see cameo of the veteran actors Rutger Hauer and Bruce Davison and Malcolm McDowell in an important role. Corey Feldman is unrecognizable in the role of a sadistic drag queen vampire. It is impressive the number of fake reviews in IMDB, maybe made by robots, but it is difficult to understand the motive. "Corbin Nash" is neither a masterpiece nor an art film, but the horror and action are quite attractive and entertaining for true fans of the genre. My vote is seven.

Title (Brazil): Not Applicable

I so wanted this to be a great movie, especially since Corey Feldman has been so proud of it to encourage his entire Feldfam via twitter to give it stellar reviews on all review sites so it will expand to other theaters. And I guess there is some gang out there called the "wolf pack" that didn't like the video. I read in one of the reviews it was a guy named Bobby Wolfe, not gonna lie, his YouTube channel does kick ass btw--more than this Corbin Nash movie and Bobby Wolfe's youtube channel is free. Back to Corey's excitement, it was contagious, maybe this was his big comeback, because let's face it, his singing does kind of...suck. But, nope, I am afraid he just isn't the actor he was as a child, his performance in this movie not only broke my heart, it made me a bit sick. While I must admit I don't have any vampire friends, I have several friends in the trans community and well, as much "method" acting Corey claimed to have practiced, I don't think it worked well for him in this role...at...all. Maybe it is time for Corey Feldman to collect one last go fund me account and raise enough to retire once and for all. Sorry Feldman I just couldn't in all honesty give your movie/performance a perfect score, why would you ask us to, you let me down with this performance. I give up Feldog completely. :(

It is unfortunately rare these days to find a movie that's honest with itself, Corbin Nash absolutely delivers.

No high budgets, no robots fighting each other, and no Megan Fox washing a piece of product placement. Engaging script, wonderful performances from a cast that's full of talent and legends, and beautifully shot.

The best vampire movie in a decade.

Glad to see this has risen in its over all ratings. New and original vampire movies are getting harder and harder to come by. Has the potential to become a cult classic! And the people giving it such low ratings here will probably be the first to claim they loved it first. Either that or the gender-bending content was just too much for them.

Wouldn't be surprised if this spawned sequels, but I'm sure they won't be as good.

Feldman's camp demon is very entertaining, but probably should have dropped the Silence of the Lambs reference in the car at the beginning, if it was intentional. Richard Wagner does a great job throughout as Vince, Feldman's naughty love interest. Very creepy indeed!

Was actually glad to see that they achieved the mood and atmosphere, without over-the-top special effects.

If you liked "From Dusk Till Dawn," "Blade" and "The Crow" you'll probably like Corbin Nash.

I kept watching thinking it would get better. It didn't. Awful acting, script, and editing.

The star rating system of IMDB will not allow a minus rating, so, i gave it one star. Undoubly, the worst movie ever made. half of it is unexplained, at all, you just sit and watch things happen on the screan, not connected to anything in the film, you do learn some few things about the devil - he is (was?) a vampire, and u can kill him with a wooden stick, etc. etc. etc. All things considered, really the worst film ever, will bore you to death.

Yikes.... Particularly stupid movie, basically religious propaganda, with extremely poor acting, hilariously cheesy action sequences, and a heavy dose of homophobia/transphobia.

Sparing some time for writing a comment is another waste of time but this is something like civic responsibility.

I trust the imdb rating system, so I watched this based on around a 5 star rating. It is cheesy and cringe worthy. Seriously, b-rate does not even come close to describing how bad this is. There are b-rate low budget movies that turn out to be good. This movie deserves a 1 or 2 star rating, but Feldman has apparently sent twitter followers to boost the ratings. This is a corruption of a good rating system.

Quit watching before it finished running to a likely miserable ending. Chopped up, incoherent mess. Waste of what little time I did spend watching it.

I do wonder when I see all these 1- and 10-star reviews alongside each other, defeats the purpose of IMDb's sliding scale. Surely a film has to be spectacularly bad or good to earn that sort of rating, and 'Corbin Nash' was neither of those for me.

I can understand some of the flack it gets. A 'bit-part' film that doesn't really know what it is ... apocalyptic, torture-revenge, fantasy, vampire-slaying, (although as someone already pointed out, they've rather tagged this on the end), even Christian imagery ... the mish-mash of candy-noir doesn't really work for me either. Some of the reviews put it down to the acting (blind prophet Malcolm McDowell trying to sound profound is stretching it ...), more likely to be the writing. Anyways, don't over-think Corbin Nash, arch-villains Corey Feldman and Richard Wagner make the film more than bearable, although I'm sure if it were Batman the whole thing would play out better. Strange, too, that 'heavy-hitters' McDowell and Rutger Hauer obviously saw something in the film, more than the 1 out of 10 some reviewers believe it merits.

So, you're not going to get these 100 minutes back, but Corbin Nash is a passable one-time viewing. Lie back and enjoy all the gore and filth ...

I was hoping that my first review would be a positive one about a great movie. Sadly, that wasn't to be. This one forced my hand and demanded that I sit down and warn the public about how bad it is.

I was really looking forward to watching this. I wanted it to be a really good, but after 15 mins I was sorely disappointed. I kept hoping it would get better, but it never did.

Everything about it was wrong. Bad script, bad acting, bad cinematography, bad direction, and that mortal sin, overacting. As a lover of this genre I am begging you, please don't bother with this terrible, terrible movie.

If I could find the people who gave this such a high rating, I would lock them in a room with everyone who was involved with making this, and make them watch it for the rest of their lives.

I gave it 2 stars because I'm sure there are worse movies out there.

Excuse me now while I gouge my eyes out with a spoon.

Nice change from all the lovey-dovey vampire movies.

I'm wondering why a few are calling this so bad?? Seems to be a lot of hate for Corey Feldman and I don't get it. I am not a fan of Tom Cruise's personal life but I could care less as long as he is entertaining as an actor.

This film was very interesting. There's a few easter eggs planted throughout which I found when I watched the second time with my wife. Very cool!! Some great vampire stuff in there. The action was awesome and just enough blood and gore for us. Corey Feldman was great! Him and his partner's relationship is super creepy. Also love Rutger Hauer and Malcolm McDowell.

Very cool film over all! Definitely a new spin on the vampire genera!! And set up for a sequel. I give it a 7.

Ok, so, being the leader of the "wolfpack" you're probably thinking I came here just to trash the movie. Not true at all! I was begged to watch it and I did, but stopped after 30 minutes. Omg. Not even on a bet would I finish this. Sorry, I won't get into details because being who I am, no one will believe I gave it a fair shot.I don't want to be considered a bully. Let's just say it's not my favorite Feldman movie.

If you guys wanna see some interesting videos regarding Corey, check out YouTube and search everythingbobbywolfe

Cheers!

The movie was not good, the writing was poor. honestly this movie was not half as good as the worst lostboys movie, i think the worst one got a 4.6. like i said honest. its not the worst movie i've ever seen, but its like miles from being decent. feldman is poor, his trans-whatever vampire is just nonsense. what is wrong with him. how the producers ever got mcdowell and hauer to make cameos in this movie is beyond me. must have a slow decade.