JFK: One day in America

This is just your usual run of the mill JFK documentary. Though it has people who are still alive and were either part of the Government at that time, involved in the City of Dallas, or had a connection with Oswald. National Geographic has added color to some of the archival footage, which didn't needed to be done but whatever.

There's not much that is really uncovered here that is new, there is plenty of information left out. Really nothing in it is new. We all know that this year marked the release of the Additional Documents Release starting in April-Aug, which is all available on line through the National Archives website.

It is worth giving it a watch, but don't expect to learn any new information or details. This is still one well kept secret.

The best part of this series is the interviews with actual participants and witnesses of that fateful day in Dallas, though by this time, so distant from those events, most seem somewhat dispassionate, and their stories, retold probably hundreds of times, sometimes take on the suggestion of a melodramatic script. Completely understandable, of course. How many docs have they been in? The constant, slow, morbid funeral home dirge in the background is laughably heavy handed.

You'd think there's nothing left to say about this subject; no new information to offer, and no new footage to be seen. But what this series has done is reprehensible. They've taken lots of the now-exhausted familiar footage of that day and falsified it with colorization. Yes, even videotape material has been infected with this falsification that has been used to attack any number of black and white films and still photographs that can be seen on the internet and other cable TV offerings.

So if every frame of a scene has been tampered with, how much trust is deserved? They also did an extremely cowardly act; the pivot point of the whole real-life incident; the Zapruder film is shown, everybody's seen it a thousand times, so we know what the fatal shot looks like. BUT HERE, IT'S BEEN REMOVED. I guess with CGI or something, so it runs smooth, but terrible or not, it's vital to show it. The audience is being protected. It's being infantalized. There are many, better documentaries on this event all ready made.

For such a well-documented, critically examined moment in history, it is remarkable that anything new can be uncovered about 11/22/63. But that is exactly what director Ella Wright accomplishes in "JFK: One Day in America" on the 60th anniversary of those tragic events.

What is remarkable about this National Geographic series is that it combines a straightforward documentary approach with little nuggets of eyewitness stories (tougher and tougher to find as the years roll by).

On one hand, the three episodes here are a fairly chronological retelling (albeit one of the highest production value) of the entire ordeal, such as President Kennedy's arrival in Texas, the assassination itself, Lee Harvey Oswald's involvement (and own subsequent fate), and Jackie Kennedy's journey through it all up to the funeral in Washington DC.

On the other hand, the hallmark of "One Day in America" might be the personal remembrances of those directly involved. For example, a worker at the Texas School Book Depository who actually carpooled with Oswald to work that fateful morning is heard from. On another occasion, the Secret Service agent in charge of Mrs. Kennedy recounts lifting the lid of JFK's casket for the First Lady to take one last look at her slain husband.

This is also one of the most most rawly emotional nonfiction series you'll ever find. Though not one ounce manipulative, it expertly portrays the personal grief of those directly involved and the mourning of the nation as a whole over the seemingly unthinkable loss of a young, full-of-promise leader.

This was one of the easiest 10/10 ratings I've ever given a documentary series. There is not a person alive I wouldn't recommend it to.

Had way to many commercials me and my best friends dad enjoyed the archive footage but way to many commercials hence the two out of ten. If it had less commercials than maybe it would have been better looking forward to the history channel take on Former President John F. Kennedy. What else could I say about i had high hopes for it and i mean very high hopes for it. I am huge history buff but this hit a cord that didn't do to well I wish it was less commercials but I get why it had so many cause they need to make money somehow. I wouldn't even recommend to a history scholar that's how bad the commercials ruined the experience for me.

Lies That Have Been Proven As Lies First, this was created by National Geographic, so it's no surprise that it's highly sanitised. Second, if you are going to have colour footage, let it ALL be in colour - colourise all of it, not just parts.

Whilst the interviews were interesting, it was very clear they had been rehearsed for 6 decades and obvious the people are not telling the whole story.

What Is surprising is that with all the information that was recently redacted, with Jackie Kennedy's own words, with the Laws of Physics, with all the forensic science and even the three different caskets shown in this series NG would still perpetuate the same story from 22NOV63. Also surprisingly they allowed the footage of people talking about the Xd by amazon and Xd by amazon; and the man that said Congress did it. As Jackie Kennedy said to Mrs. Johnson when asked if she wanted to change her clothes "No. Let THEM see what THEY have done.