Aakhri Sach

In a nutshell, if you had found the Burari case intriguing, this show will not disappoint you.

The screenplay is a nice adoption of the original story where the key details have been preserved while making changes where there was an opportunity to add the fiction angle and also spin a meaningful story. The narration is good and sets up the premise to make you want to pursue the story despite knowing it from the Netflix documentary. While the facts were known, a story is always better when told in a way where you can perceive the psyche of the characters from their own PoV, even if it was actually the director's cut.

The Netflix documentary was really good and actually compliments this show. Without that initial foundation this show wouldn't really have the impact it is meant to have. However, documentaries are just facts and that was what it was in this case too. So a webseries that actually brings those characters to life and makes them narrate their own story..that's the main reason you don't want to miss this.

Overall a good watch, however, some characters haven't done much justice to their roles. And adding unnecessary characters and giving them screen space was a turn off. Nobody is interested in the personal lives of characters other than the victims here, so adding that extra background story for Tamannah's character was totally a filler and deviates the viewer's attention.

Portraying real-life tragedies like the Burari mass murder case for entertainment purposes requires a delicate and thoughtful approach. Unfortunately, adaptations such as the web series "Akhri Sach" often fail to uphold this responsibility. The concern isn't merely about the act of adaptation itself, but the manner in which it is executed.

Tragic events like the Burari case involve the loss of real lives, the pain of surviving family members, and the ripple effect on the community. Such adaptations risk oversimplifying complex situations and reducing them to mere entertainment. This can be deeply distressing for those affected, as it undermines the gravity of their experiences.

While entertainment can serve as a medium to explore human experiences, it's crucial to recognize the line between respectful storytelling and sensationalism. The creators of such adaptations should consider the impact of their work on the memory of the victims and the emotional well-being of the families involved.

Rather than exploiting the shock value of real tragedies, responsible storytelling should aim to shed light on the human aspects of these events. The focus should be on understanding the motivations, circumstances, and the broader context that led to such incidents. This requires thorough research, empathy, and a commitment to honoring the truth.

In summary, the adaptation of real-life tragedies for entertainment purposes, like "Akhri Sach," can come across as inconsiderate and disrespectful. It's a reminder that creators have a responsibility to handle such topics with care, sensitivity, and a deep understanding of the impact on those affected. The goal should be to raise awareness, foster empathy, and encourage meaningful discussions, rather than sensationalize or trivialize profound human experiences.

This is a waste of time

Rather watch the Netflix documentary House of Secrets which is far better.

The issue with this series is most of the people knows what happened actually in real life. Whereas it is made from a filmy perspective.

Avoid if you don't want to waste your time. Acting is below par. Under utilizes Abhishek Banerjee. Also it should have ended in season 1 itself but has been dragged to season 2. The case was not so long. Also everyone knows it is still not solved why drag it to two or more season. While watching it seemed as an Indian daily soap more.

P. S. - should have not been made.

I don't know why do much hatred for this story, it is not very good series but it is quiet decent series to watch. Good acting perfomance, decent screenplay and overall sound direction.

Some people are comparing this netflix dicumentory that we have to understand normal series and documentory have immense difference. Definately this series could be better but if anyone says it is worthless that is completely wrong. The total six episodes are quite engaging if anyone don't know the actual story they really liked it. Another thing definitely need to mention the locatiin, house and others parts is very sumilar to original house ot locality.

One star deducted for the weekly drops. I read some of the negative user reviews and realised that these are all kneejerk reactions to the first 2 episodes.

The makers have stayed close to the real events and created a compelling tale that will give you goosebumps. Tamanna looks monotone at the beginning but gradually comes to her own as her character evolves. Abhishek Banerjee is spectacular, he keeps getting better with every project. The ensemble cast looks okay, but could have been better (going by the ensemble casts of other realistic shows). Don't compare it with the documentary. Both have different treatments.