A Cruel Love: The Ruth Ellis Story

I'm old enough to remember capital punishment and well remember the Christie case of 10 Rillington Place because it was so horrific. I can't remember the Ruth Ellis case though but may have just forgotten it. Christie deserved to be executed but Ellis probably not. What bothered me watching this mini series, starring Lucy Boynton as Ellis, highlighted for me how little discrimination there was between the two killers I've mentioned. If found guilty, they were hanged, regardless of the obvious differences in their motives. Ellis' was a crime of passion and caused her to lose control, whereas Christie was just evil. The Ellis case helped to end our barbaric sentencing procedure and blanket death sentences.

To the series, Lucy does a fair job of portraying Ruth although I thought she was a bit posh. Ellis was Welsh and the accent seemed wrong. Toby Jones I love to watch in anything as his mastery of the camera is always a joy. Nigel Havers pops up playing his own grandfather, Cecil, who had to sentence Ruth. Nigel has said that his grandfather was upset with this case and tried unsuccessfully to have it overturned.

Ruth murdered her lover David, by shooting him at close range four times as he came out of a pub. The series shows their relationship and subsequent turn of events. I do wish that current casting didn't distort history as we know Ruth's prison warden was not as shown in the series.

It kept me watching in spite of knowing the outcome, mainly because I like the leading actors and the directing was good.

Lucy Boynton deserves more than a rating of 7 for her brave portrayal of Ruth Ellis, but "A Cruel Love" suffers from a shallow screenplay by Kelly Jones. The same few facts are told over and over: that she loved David Blakely (Laurie Davidson) to a fault, that she holds herself guilty and responsible for his murder. We learn little about Ruth's early life, or her marriage, and her children are reduced to props. She got solid help from the actors Toby Stephens and Toby Jones, though why Jones chose to whisper every single line of dialog was beyond me. As for Mark Stanley playing Desmond Cusson, the man devoted to her, he barely makes an impression.

The production design by Stephen Campbell is particularly commendable for its bold, dark colors and period sets. I didn't understand how Ruth could afford the array of dresses in her wardrobe, given that she wasn't even able to afford rent, but I took it for eye candy. The series could easily have been three episodes instead of four, except for one thing: when Boynton is on the screen, all you want is more.

Ruth Ellis ironically gained a sort of immortality in British criminal history right at the moment of her death as she was the last woman to be executed, unless the death penalty is ever reinstated, which I personally hope it isn't. Her sorry story has been told before on the small and big screen but here we are again, almost exactly 70 years on, for this 4-part ITV series starring Lucy Boynton in the title role.

It starts explosively as we witness Ellis cold-bloodedly murder her lover David Blakely by shooting him on a public street in front of witnesses. To that extent it's an open-and-shut case but as we're inevitably flashed back to how we've got to this point, the question of diminished responsibility through provocation emerges, which, if accepted by a jury, might reduce her sentence and so spare her life. This aspect of the narrative is what connects it to the present day, that of course, and the afore mentioned argument against capital punishment. However, as history tells us, neither the diminished responsibility defence or the abolition of the rope were passed into law until years later, although the point is made that this case.may well have assisted in hastening both law changes.

This was a high-end production, featuring an excellent central performance by Boynton torn between her two heartless lovers played by Laurie Davidson and Mark Stanley. The strong casting continues with other familiar faces such as the ubiquitous, super-reliable Toby Jones as Ellis's unyielding first defence solicitor, Arthur Darvill as her last-chance counsel and, as the sympathetic prison governor, Juliet Stevenson. Yes, that final piece of casting tells you diversity supercedes authenticity which you see reflected in other places too, but nevertheless, cleverly, atmospherically and at the end, sympathetically directed, this was a compelling and impactful mini-series well worth watching.

As with the film Let Him Have It, Iit's hard to do a real life story but, at least 70 years on, there are few people around to state how lose to the truth the characters and the facts are.

There is a top cast here but most of them do seem to be playing themselves. Lucy Boynton is just like the posh girl she played in Why Didn't They Ask Evans, Joe Armstrong does a poor job trying not to remind us of his dad in New Tricks, Toby Jones is Mr Bates, that metal detector guy and all his other roles rolled into one while Mark Stanley puts on a moustache and glasses trying to hope we don't remember him from Happy Valley while Julie Stevenson tries not to play the psychologist from Professor T.

Admittedly, Nigel Havers does a good job playing his grandad assuming his grandad was just like Nigel Havers.

All this window dressing, including great deal on 1950s cars and styles, doesn't hide the fact that in all modern dramas, men are portrayed as weak or evil even in true crime dramas set 70 years ago.

The swipe at the establishment of the day is understandable. Ellis is shown to be a common girl doing well for herself in business but she has no power of the establishment and the old school tie.

A fair watch but you don't put your best shows on tv in the spring. A modern feminist attack on an old story.

Ruth Ellis This is story that is both fascinating and heart breaking that I was looking forward to. There is place for a discussion about the need for the ultimate justice to be delivered whilst also not shying away from its mistakes. Or as in the case whether like France there should be a place for a "crime of passion" is crime passionnel. It refers to a violent crime, such as murder, that is committed due to a strong impulse, like anger or jealousy.

But this film sadly is not it. First of all this is just too serious a topic for us to be distracted by "the message", its imposition here is inappropriate. My first impression however is to be frustrated by the poor set design and dialogue. What was the weird railway like carriage that was I think meant to be a café? If anyone wants to know they looked like then watch "Vera Drake" or "The Krays" or "Look Back in Anger". The sets are just jarringly inauthentic.

When she calls someone "pompous" I laughed out loud. Who wrote the dialogue I wondered. Then I saw Kelly Jones wrote the dialogue and she is posh from Oxford. Fair enough. But what about those accents? They sound like Dick Van Dyke, the casting is wrong.

Lastly ALL the men are bad. Horrible, nasty. Come on now this trope is just such a bore.