Lovely y Jean Antony, viviendo en países diferentes, enfrentan una crisis legal cuando Jean visita Londres con su hija de 1.5 años. ¿Podrán superar los desafíos y reunirse a pesar de descono... Leer todoLovely y Jean Antony, viviendo en países diferentes, enfrentan una crisis legal cuando Jean visita Londres con su hija de 1.5 años. ¿Podrán superar los desafíos y reunirse a pesar de desconocer las leyes locales?Lovely y Jean Antony, viviendo en países diferentes, enfrentan una crisis legal cuando Jean visita Londres con su hija de 1.5 años. ¿Podrán superar los desafíos y reunirse a pesar de desconocer las leyes locales?
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Elenco
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
Cinematography, Editing, Background score, and Music are good.
Script, Direction and acting are at very poor level.
If you are eager to watch any film since you have no other film options, you can watch. Nothing new. Most of the elements are from other related movies. Basic thread is already seen in other movies like 'Mrs. Chatterjee vs Norway', but added more drama on it which spoiled the essence. More over, as said, the scripting, direction and acting spoiled it more and felt like better watching any stage drama. Better to save your time for any other purposes than watching this movie which is a copy-paste from various movies in the same language and other languages.
Script, Direction and acting are at very poor level.
If you are eager to watch any film since you have no other film options, you can watch. Nothing new. Most of the elements are from other related movies. Basic thread is already seen in other movies like 'Mrs. Chatterjee vs Norway', but added more drama on it which spoiled the essence. More over, as said, the scripting, direction and acting spoiled it more and felt like better watching any stage drama. Better to save your time for any other purposes than watching this movie which is a copy-paste from various movies in the same language and other languages.
Really well written and good story! It was a very good performance by the actors. I wouldn't belive Binu Augustines first movie this gone to the peak "Big Ben" is a must-watch movie for all Malayalam cinema lovers. Director Binu Augustine has delivered a masterpiece with this film, showcasing his talent for storytelling and attention to detail. The plot is gripping and keeps you on the edge of your seat, while the performances by the cast, especially the lead actor, are top-notch. The cinematography and music also add to the overall experience of the film. I highly recommend "Big Ben" to anyone looking for a well-crafted and engaging Malayalam movie.
First and foremost, why are such films made? Because even if it was a stolen plot, if they had done it with someone who knew how to act, every scene would have been improved, even if it was thrown out of context. This film is full with confusion. There are a few nonsensical sequences. The movie's storyline and direction are completely uninteresting. It has previously been said that acting is not good. It may have been difficult to create numerous dialogues, and some moments were pushed through with music. There is also some fictionalization of real-life occurrences that never occurred. The film has elements of Western films, however it is hardly worth watching. The truth is that lead performers struggle to accurately depict actual emotions.
Movie Review: Bad Direction and Acting
Cinema, at its best, is a collaborative art form-a convergence of vision, performance, and storytelling. But when these elements fail to harmonize, the result can be a frustrating and disappointing experience. The film in question, unfortunately, is a textbook case of this failure. Aptly titled Bad Direction and Acting, this movie is a prime example of how poor execution can ruin even a mildly interesting concept.
From the opening scene, the film stumbles into a pit of clichés and awkward transitions. The plot, while not entirely devoid of potential, is executed with such laziness that it's hard to stay invested. It revolves around a young man's journey to find his identity amidst personal tragedy and societal pressure-a familiar setup that could have been moving, had it been handled with care. Instead, we're given a disjointed narrative filled with inexplicable time jumps, inconsistent character arcs, and emotionally hollow scenes.
The direction is perhaps the film's weakest link. The director seems uncertain about the tone of the movie-is it a coming-of-age drama, a psychological thriller, or a romantic tragedy? Scenes that demand emotional weight are played out with an almost comic casualness, while moments that should be subtle are exaggerated into melodrama. There's a noticeable lack of cohesion; it feels as though the director simply pieced together various scenes without considering narrative flow or audience engagement.
One glaring example is a hospital scene meant to be the emotional climax of the film. The protagonist, having just lost a loved one, breaks down in front of the camera-but instead of silence or subtle music, the director chooses to insert a loud, jarring background score that distracts rather than complements. This kind of tonal dissonance is persistent throughout the movie.
Then comes the acting-wooden, lifeless, and utterly unconvincing. The lead actor, while physically fitting for the role, delivers his lines with all the emotion of someone reading from a teleprompter. His expressions barely shift throughout the film, making it difficult to empathize with his character. Supporting actors fare no better. The romantic interest appears to be permanently confused, while the antagonist comes off more as a caricature than a credible threat. It's painful to watch scenes that are clearly meant to be emotionally powerful fall flat due to such uninspired performances.
It would be unfair, however, to ignore the few redeeming aspects of the film. The cinematography, though limited by budget, occasionally captures some striking visuals. A sunset scene on a hilltop and a quiet walk through an old market are examples of moments that hint at what the film could have been with better direction. The background score, despite a few misplaced tracks, has its moments too-especially during quieter sequences where it isn't trying to force emotion but rather support it.
Ultimately, Bad Direction and Acting lives up to its name-not as a self-aware parody or satire, but as a genuine failure in both those departments. It's a cautionary tale for filmmakers about the importance of coherence, performance, and emotional sincerity. It also reminds audiences that even a decent script cannot save a film from the clutches of poor direction and terrible acting.
If you're looking for a masterclass in what not to do in cinema, this film might serve as a useful reference. Otherwise, it's best avoided. Time is precious, and there are far better films out there that respect both the medium and the viewer.
Cinema, at its best, is a collaborative art form-a convergence of vision, performance, and storytelling. But when these elements fail to harmonize, the result can be a frustrating and disappointing experience. The film in question, unfortunately, is a textbook case of this failure. Aptly titled Bad Direction and Acting, this movie is a prime example of how poor execution can ruin even a mildly interesting concept.
From the opening scene, the film stumbles into a pit of clichés and awkward transitions. The plot, while not entirely devoid of potential, is executed with such laziness that it's hard to stay invested. It revolves around a young man's journey to find his identity amidst personal tragedy and societal pressure-a familiar setup that could have been moving, had it been handled with care. Instead, we're given a disjointed narrative filled with inexplicable time jumps, inconsistent character arcs, and emotionally hollow scenes.
The direction is perhaps the film's weakest link. The director seems uncertain about the tone of the movie-is it a coming-of-age drama, a psychological thriller, or a romantic tragedy? Scenes that demand emotional weight are played out with an almost comic casualness, while moments that should be subtle are exaggerated into melodrama. There's a noticeable lack of cohesion; it feels as though the director simply pieced together various scenes without considering narrative flow or audience engagement.
One glaring example is a hospital scene meant to be the emotional climax of the film. The protagonist, having just lost a loved one, breaks down in front of the camera-but instead of silence or subtle music, the director chooses to insert a loud, jarring background score that distracts rather than complements. This kind of tonal dissonance is persistent throughout the movie.
Then comes the acting-wooden, lifeless, and utterly unconvincing. The lead actor, while physically fitting for the role, delivers his lines with all the emotion of someone reading from a teleprompter. His expressions barely shift throughout the film, making it difficult to empathize with his character. Supporting actors fare no better. The romantic interest appears to be permanently confused, while the antagonist comes off more as a caricature than a credible threat. It's painful to watch scenes that are clearly meant to be emotionally powerful fall flat due to such uninspired performances.
It would be unfair, however, to ignore the few redeeming aspects of the film. The cinematography, though limited by budget, occasionally captures some striking visuals. A sunset scene on a hilltop and a quiet walk through an old market are examples of moments that hint at what the film could have been with better direction. The background score, despite a few misplaced tracks, has its moments too-especially during quieter sequences where it isn't trying to force emotion but rather support it.
Ultimately, Bad Direction and Acting lives up to its name-not as a self-aware parody or satire, but as a genuine failure in both those departments. It's a cautionary tale for filmmakers about the importance of coherence, performance, and emotional sincerity. It also reminds audiences that even a decent script cannot save a film from the clutches of poor direction and terrible acting.
If you're looking for a masterclass in what not to do in cinema, this film might serve as a useful reference. Otherwise, it's best avoided. Time is precious, and there are far better films out there that respect both the medium and the viewer.
"Big ben" promised to be a Good movie based on the pre-release posts, Unfortunately, it fails to deliver on almost every front, leaving viewers with a confusing, tedious mess rather than a compelling cinematic experience. It would have been better to direct this movie with some experienced director. The script, penned by the director himself. The dialogue is painfully mundane, filled with banal exchanges that contribute nothing to character development or plot progression. Conversations meander without purpose, often centered on trivial topics. Characters speak in monotones, their interactions devoid of any emotional depth or conflict.
Director brings nothing new or interesting to the table. His direction lacks any sense or innovation, resulting in scenes that drag on interminably. The pacing is glacial, with each scene stretching out longer than necessary, making the film feel interminable.
Director brings nothing new or interesting to the table. His direction lacks any sense or innovation, resulting in scenes that drag on interminably. The pacing is glacial, with each scene stretching out longer than necessary, making the film feel interminable.
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
Taquilla
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 7,583
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 2h 8min(128 min)
- Color
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta